IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i22p15812-d1277482.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consumers’ Engagement and Perspectives on Sustainable Textile Consumption

Author

Listed:
  • Pedro Rodrigues Ribeiro

    (Research Centre for Human Development (CEDH), Human Neurobehavioral Laboratory (HNL), Faculty of Education and Psychology (FEP), Universidade Católica Portuguesa, 4169-005 Porto, Portugal)

  • Patrícia Batista

    (Research Centre for Human Development (CEDH), Human Neurobehavioral Laboratory (HNL), Faculty of Education and Psychology (FEP), Universidade Católica Portuguesa, 4169-005 Porto, Portugal)

  • Francisco Mendes-Palma

    (Research Centre for Human Development (CEDH), Human Neurobehavioral Laboratory (HNL), Faculty of Education and Psychology (FEP), Universidade Católica Portuguesa, 4169-005 Porto, Portugal)

  • Manuela Pintado

    (Centre for Biotechnology and Fine Chemistry (CBQF), School of Biotechnology, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, 4169-005 Porto, Portugal)

  • Patrícia Oliveira-Silva

    (Research Centre for Human Development (CEDH), Human Neurobehavioral Laboratory (HNL), Faculty of Education and Psychology (FEP), Universidade Católica Portuguesa, 4169-005 Porto, Portugal)

Abstract

This study examines the knowledge and involvement of consumers in sustainability goals, aiming to provide valuable insights to the textiles and clothing industry to foster their social responsibility efforts and enhance consumer interaction. By comprehending and monitoring consumer behavior, organizations can effectively implement sustainable practices and work towards achieving sustainable development goals. For this study, a questionnaire was designed to evaluate consumer concerns, behavior, self-reliance, and perspectives across four key phases of interest in sustainable consumer behavior regarding textiles—acquisition, use, maintenance, and disposal. The results show a compelling insight into the mindset of participants who prioritize budget, quality, comfort, and functionality over sustainability when acquiring new textile items. Most respondents do not participate in clothing rental or sharing and predominantly refrain from purchasing second-hand products, but they expressed a readiness to extend the lifespan of their products and displayed concern about ensuring a responsible end-of-life for their belongings. Moreover, they attach importance to textile products’ social and informational attributes and demand transparency from brands. These valuable data can guide the industry in its interactions with consumers. Scholars are increasingly committed to sustainability and its implications for practical application and policy development.

Suggested Citation

  • Pedro Rodrigues Ribeiro & Patrícia Batista & Francisco Mendes-Palma & Manuela Pintado & Patrícia Oliveira-Silva, 2023. "Consumers’ Engagement and Perspectives on Sustainable Textile Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-23, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:22:p:15812-:d:1277482
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/22/15812/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/22/15812/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sungchul Choi & Alex Ng, 2011. "Environmental and Economic Dimensions of Sustainability and Price Effects on Consumer Responses," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 104(2), pages 269-282, December.
    2. Hediger, Werner, 2000. "Sustainable development and social welfare," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 481-492, March.
    3. Genovaitė Liobikienė & Mykolas Simas Poškus, 2019. "The Importance of Environmental Knowledge for Private and Public Sphere Pro-Environmental Behavior: Modifying the Value-Belief-Norm Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shuhe Zhang & Guangping Xu & Zikang Zheng, 2025. "Sustainable Product Innovation in SMEs: The Role of Digital–Green Learning Orientation and R&D Ambidexterity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-17, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Werner Hediger, 2013. "From Multifunctionality and Sustainability of Agriculture to the Social Responsibility of the Agri-food System," Journal of Socio-Economics in Agriculture (Until 2015: Yearbook of Socioeconomics in Agriculture), Swiss Society for Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, vol. 6(1), pages 59-80.
    2. Stéphane Tizio, 2004. "Etat de santé et systèmes de soins dans les pays en développement : La contribution des politiques de santé au développement durable," Mondes en développement, De Boeck Université, vol. 127(3), pages 101-117.
    3. Wei Song & Liguo Wang & Yan He & Yanting Ye & Yuting Jiang, 2024. "Study on the Strength of Rural Tourism Operators’ Willingness to Carbon Offset and Its Influencing Mechanisms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-21, July.
    4. Huan Wang, 2022. "Knowledge or Responsibility? The Role of Media Use on Citizens’ Willingness to Pay for Environment Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-15, November.
    5. K. Deshika De S. Jayasekara & Darshana Rajapaksa & U. A. D. Prasanthi Gunawardena, 2024. "Impacts of Environmental Knowledge, Motives, and Behavior on Ecotourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-20, June.
    6. Livio Cricelli & Serena Strazzullo, 2021. "The Economic Aspect of Digital Sustainability: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-15, July.
    7. Wafa Alwakid & Sebastian Aparicio & David Urbano, 2021. "The Influence of Green Entrepreneurship on Sustainable Development in Saudi Arabia: The Role of Formal Institutions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-23, May.
    8. Aikaterini Argyrou & Nicolas Chevrollier & Andre Nijhof, 2023. "The versatile role of sustainable market entrepreneurs in market transformation: An intervention framework for institutional change," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 259-273, January.
    9. Patrick Klein & Bastian Popp, 2022. "Last-Mile Delivery Methods in E-Commerce: Does Perceived Sustainability Matter for Consumer Acceptance and Usage?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-27, December.
    10. Iuliana Raluca Gheorghe & Victor Lorin Purcarea & Consuela Madalina Gheorghe, 2018. "Consumer eWOM Communication: The Missing Link between Relational Capital and Sustainable Bioeconomy Ii Health Care Services," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 20(49), pages 684-684, August.
    11. Uttam Shankar Pawaskar & Rakesh D Raut & Bhaskar B Gardas, 2018. "Assessment of Consumer Behavior Towards Environmental Responsibility: A Structural Equations Modeling Approach," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(4), pages 560-571, May.
    12. Asterios Stroumpoulis & Evangelia Kopanaki & George Karaganis, 2021. "Examining the Relationship between Information Systems, Sustainable SCM, and Competitive Advantage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, October.
    13. Dongyi Ji & Siwarit Pongsakornrungsilp & Pimlapas Pongsakornrungsilp & Vikas Kumar, 2025. "When Mindful Consumption Meets Green Purchase Intention: Empirical Evidence on How a Mindful Mindset Influences Tourists," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-22, February.
    14. Sung Hee Lee & Kun Soo Park & Yong Won Seo, 2016. "Multinational Firm’s Production Decisions under Overlapping Free Trade Agreements: Rule of Origin Requirements and Environmental Regulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, December.
    15. Yeonsoo Kim, 2017. "Consumer Responses to the Food Industry’s Proactive and Passive Environmental CSR, Factoring in Price as CSR Tradeoff," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 140(2), pages 307-321, January.
    16. Aivaras Vijaikis & Mykolas Simas Poškus, 2024. "Does Being an Environmental Citizen Lead to Greater Well-Being? The Self-Determination Theory Approach," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, August.
    17. Long Guo & Dongsheng Sun & Muhammad Akib Warraich & Abdul Waheed, 2023. "Does industry 5.0 model optimize sustainable performance of Agri‐enterprises? Real‐time investigation from the realm of stakeholder theory and domain," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(4), pages 2507-2516, August.
    18. Muhammad Khan & Gohar Saleem Parvaiz & Abbas Ali & Majid Jehangir & Noor Hassan & Junghan Bae, 2022. "A Model for Understanding the Mediating Association of Transparency between Emerging Technologies and Humanitarian Logistics Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-23, June.
    19. Gabriel Andy Szalkowski & Christian Johansen, 2024. "Defining and measuring the effects of digital technologies on social sustainability: A systematic literature review," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), pages 1678-1699, June.
    20. Francisco Rincon‐Roldan & Alvaro Lopez‐Cabrales, 2021. "Ethical values in social economy for sustainable development," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 92(4), pages 705-729, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:22:p:15812-:d:1277482. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.