IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i20p15111-d1264212.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contrasts in Sustainability between Hub-Based and Point-to-Point Airline Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Morton E. O’Kelly

    (Department of Geography, The Ohio State University, 154 N. Oval Mall, Columbus, OH 43210, USA)

  • Yongha Park

    (Department of Geography Education, Jeonbuk National University, 567 Baekje-daero, Deokjin-gu, Jeonju-si 54896, Jeollabuk-do, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

Airline hubs are often defined as nodes with a high degree of connectivity. Connectivity is measured by the “degree” of the node. The degree distribution of hub networks tends to have a convex shape (curved towards the origin), while point-to-point networks have a higher number of high-degree nodes and a concave shape. This study aims to classify airline networks based on their hub orientation, expanding our understanding of network differences. The analysis in this paper involves fitting a power-law distribution, determining the range of degree distribution, and calculating the distribution of betweenness. These analyses provide insight into the classification of each airline. Each measurement helps to clarify the ambiguity in other scores. The goal is to establish a small set of rules that can clearly distinguish between the main types of networks. The classification includes four types of networks: One-hub, P2P (point-to-point), Multi-hub, and Complex networks. There is a well-recognized empirical distinction between hub networks, which have a few places with large betweenness, and point-to-point cases, which have a larger number of places with moderate betweenness. The significance of these results in terms of geographic importance is demonstrated by sorting 284 different airline networks based on these dimensions. These findings are expected to provide valuable information about the resilience and recovery of a network, as networks with many long-range connections are particularly vulnerable to a decrease in traffic. Additionally, these results have implications for the ability of networks to recover from a downturn.

Suggested Citation

  • Morton E. O’Kelly & Yongha Park, 2023. "Contrasts in Sustainability between Hub-Based and Point-to-Point Airline Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-17, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:20:p:15111-:d:1264212
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/20/15111/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/20/15111/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zuidberg, Joost & de Wit, Jaap G., 2020. "The development of long-haul low-cost networks in the North Atlantic airline market: An exploratory data approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 103-113.
    2. Cheung, Tommy K.Y. & Wong, Collin W.H. & Zhang, Anming, 2020. "The evolution of aviation network: Global airport connectivity index 2006–2016," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    3. Lordan, Oriol & Sallan, Jose M. & Escorihuela, Nuria & Gonzalez-Prieto, David, 2016. "Robustness of airline route networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 445(C), pages 18-26.
    4. Lordan, Oriol & Sallan, Jose M. & Simo, Pep, 2014. "Study of the topology and robustness of airline route networks from the complex network approach: a survey and research agenda," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 112-120.
    5. Zhu, Zhenran & Zhang, Anming & Zhang, Yahua & Huang, Zhibin & Xu, Shiteng, 2019. "Measuring air connectivity between China and Australia," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 359-370.
    6. Roger Guimerà & Luís A. Nunes Amaral, 2005. "Functional cartography of complex metabolic networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 433(7028), pages 895-900, February.
    7. Sun, Xiaoqian & Wandelt, Sebastian & Zhang, Anming, 2021. "On the degree of synchronization between air transport connectivity and COVID-19 cases at worldwide level," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 115-123.
    8. Bagler, Ganesh, 2008. "Analysis of the airport network of India as a complex weighted network," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 387(12), pages 2972-2980.
    9. Chang, Yu-Chun & Lee, Wei-Hao & Hsu, Chia-Jui, 2020. "Identifying competitive position for ten Asian aviation hubs," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 51-66.
    10. O. Woolley-Meza & C. Thiemann & D. Grady & J. Lee & H. Seebens & B. Blasius & D. Brockmann, 2011. "Complexity in human transportation networks: a comparative analysis of worldwide air transportation and global cargo-ship movements," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 84(4), pages 589-600, December.
    11. Mengyuan Sun & Yong Tian & Yao Zhang & Muhammad Nadeem & Can Xu, 2021. "Environmental Impact and External Costs Associated with Hub-and-Spoke Network in Air Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-21, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Linfeng & Hou, Meng & Liu, Yichen & Wang, Kun & Yang, Hangjun, 2022. "Measuring Beijing's international air connectivity and suggestions for improvement post COVID-19," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 132-143.
    2. Zhou, Yaoming & Wang, Junwei & Huang, George Q., 2019. "Efficiency and robustness of weighted air transport networks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 14-26.
    3. Lordan, Oriol & Sallan, Jose M., 2019. "Core and critical cities of global region airport networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 513(C), pages 724-733.
    4. Li, Siping & Zhou, Yaoming & Kundu, Tanmoy & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, 2021. "Spatiotemporal variation of the worldwide air transportation network induced by COVID-19 pandemic in 2020," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 168-184.
    5. Cheung, Tommy K.Y. & Wong, Collin W.H. & Zhang, Anming, 2020. "The evolution of aviation network: Global airport connectivity index 2006–2016," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    6. Cheung, Tommy K.Y. & Wong, Collin WH. & Lei, Zheng, 2022. "Assessment of hub airports' connectivity and Self-Connection Potentials," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 250-259.
    7. Bingxue Qian & Ning Zhang, 2022. "Topology and Robustness of Weighted Air Transport Networks in Multi-Airport Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-15, June.
    8. Zhou, Yaoming & Kundu, Tanmoy & Qin, Wei & Goh, Mark & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, 2021. "Vulnerability of the worldwide air transportation network to global catastrophes such as COVID-19," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    9. Redondi, Renato & Birolini, Sebastian & Morlotti, Chiara & Paleari, Stefano, 2021. "Connectivity measures and passengers’ behavior: Comparing conventional connectivity models to predict itinerary market shares," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    10. Li, Siping & Zhou, Yaoming & Kundu, Tanmoy & Zhang, Fangni, 2021. "Impact of entry restriction policies on international air transport connectivity during COVID-19 pandemic," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    11. Wen, Xiangxi & Tu, Congliang & Wu, Minggong, 2018. "Node importance evaluation in aviation network based on “No Return” node deletion method," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 503(C), pages 546-559.
    12. Lawford, Steve & Mehmeti, Yll, 2020. "Cliques and a new measure of clustering: With application to U.S. domestic airlines," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 560(C).
    13. Warnock-Smith, David & Christidis, Panayotis, 2021. "European Union-Latin America/Caribbean air transport connectivity and competitiveness in different air policy contexts," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    14. Silva, Thiago Christiano & Dias, Felipe A.M. & dos Reis, Vinicius E. & Tabak, Benjamin M., 2022. "The role of network topology in competition and ticket pricing in air transportation: Evidence from Brazil," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 601(C).
    15. Dong-Joon Kang & Su-Han Woo, 2017. "Liner shipping networks, port characteristics and the impact on port performance," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 19(2), pages 274-295, June.
    16. Hu, Xinlei & Huang, Jie & Shi, Feng, 2022. "A robustness assessment with passenger flow data of high-speed rail network in China," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 165(P1).
    17. Jiang, Yonglei & Yao, Baozhen & Wang, Lu & Feng, Tao & Kong, Lu, 2017. "Evolution trends of the network structure of Spring Airlines in China: A temporal and spatial analysis," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 18-30.
    18. Min Su & Baoyang Hu & Yipeng Jiang & Zhenchao Zhang & Zeyang Li, 2022. "Relationship between the Chinese Main Air Transport Network and COVID-19 Pandemic Transmission," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(13), pages 1-17, July.
    19. Voltes-Dorta, Augusto & Rodríguez-Déniz, Héctor & Suau-Sanchez, Pere, 2017. "Passenger recovery after an airport closure at tourist destinations: A case study of Palma de Mallorca airport," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 449-466.
    20. Sun, Xiaoqian & Wandelt, Sebastian & Zhang, Anming, 2022. "STARTUPS: Founding airlines during COVID-19 - A hopeless endeavor or an ample opportunity for a better aviation system?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 10-19.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:20:p:15111-:d:1264212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.