IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i20p14829-d1258855.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of Sowing Method on Yield of Different Plants Grown as a Catch Crop

Author

Listed:
  • Edward Wilczewski

    (Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture and Biotechnology, University of Science and Technology, 7 Prof. S. Kaliskiego St., 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland)

  • Lech Gałęzewski

    (Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture and Biotechnology, University of Science and Technology, 7 Prof. S. Kaliskiego St., 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland)

Abstract

Currently, the most important task of stubble catch crops, as an element of sustainable agriculture, is to provide the soil with organic matter. The basic problem in the implementation of this task is the shortage of precipitation during the sowing period, which, combined with high temperatures in Europe in August, results in the loss of soil water and, consequently, weakening of germination and delay in plant emergence. The development of agrotechnics to increase the reliability of germination of seeds of plants grown as a catch crops is very important for the use of this valuable source of organic matter in regions with low and irregular rainfall, especially in the case of light soils with low water retention capacity. The aim of the study was to evaluate the response to furrow sowing of plants from various botanical groups grown as a stubble catch crop. Field studies were carried out on lessive soil in 2013–2015 at the Research Station in Mochełek near Bydgoszcz. The subject of the research was the sowing method (factor I): furrow sowing versus traditional (row) sowing. Sowing methods were tested for four crops (factor II): white mustard, tansy phacelia, common buckwheat, and common vetch. Certain plants reacted differently to the use of furrow sowing, and this reaction was different in various years of the study. In years with average soil moisture during the sowing period, furrow sowing made it possible to increase the yield of green mass and post-harvest residues of catch crop. In a year with very low soil moisture in this period, the desired effect of this method was not obtained. Furrow sowing allows seeds to be placed in a deeper, more moist soil layer, which can contribute to the acceleration of plant emergence. However, it requires refinement in terms of the precision of covering the sown seeds with soil.

Suggested Citation

  • Edward Wilczewski & Lech Gałęzewski, 2023. "Effect of Sowing Method on Yield of Different Plants Grown as a Catch Crop," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-13, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:20:p:14829-:d:1258855
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/20/14829/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/20/14829/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Juan-Carlos Ciscar, 2012. "The impacts of climate change in Europe (the PESETA research project)," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 112(1), pages 1-6, May.
    2. Anna Kocira & Mariola Staniak & Marzena Tomaszewska & Rafał Kornas & Jacek Cymerman & Katarzyna Panasiewicz & Halina Lipińska, 2020. "Legume Cover Crops as One of the Elements of Strategic Weed Management and Soil Quality Improvement. A Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-41, September.
    3. Ravjit Khangura & David Ferris & Cameron Wagg & Jamie Bowyer, 2023. "Regenerative Agriculture—A Literature Review on the Practices and Mechanisms Used to Improve Soil Health," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-41, January.
    4. Artur Szatkowski & Mateusz Sokólski & Dariusz Załuski & Krzysztof Józef Jankowski, 2023. "The Effects of Agronomic Management in Different Tillage Systems on the Fall Growth of Winter Oilseed Rape," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-14, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mariola Staniak & Ewa Szpunar-Krok & Anna Kocira, 2023. "Responses of Soybean to Selected Abiotic Stresses—Photoperiod, Temperature and Water," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-28, January.
    2. Riccardo Massantini & Emanuele Radicetti & Maria Teresa Frangipane & Enio Campiglia, 2021. "Quality of Tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum L.) Changes under Different Cover Crops, Soil Tillage and Nitrogen Fertilization Management," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-14, January.
    3. Giulio Flavio Rizzo & Nicolas Al Achkar & Simone Treccarichi & Giuseppe Malgioglio & Matteo Giuseppe Infurna & Sebastian Nigro & Alessandro Tribulato & Ferdinando Branca, 2023. "Use of Bioinoculants Affects Variation in Snap Bean Yield Grown under Deficit Irrigation," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-13, April.
    4. Tanja Dergan & Aneta Ivanovska & Tina Kocjančič & Pietro P. M. Iannetta & Marko Debeljak, 2022. "‘Multi-SWOT’ Multi-Stakeholder-Based Sustainability Assessment Methodology: Applied to Improve Slovenian Legume-Based Agri-Food Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-26, November.
    5. Yeboah, Samuel, 2023. "Unlocking the Potential of Technological Innovations for Sustainable Agriculture in Developing Countries: Enhancing Resource Efficiency and Environmental Sustainability," MPRA Paper 118215, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 26 Jul 2023.
    6. George Kyriakarakos & Theodoros Petropoulos & Vasso Marinoudi & Remigio Berruto & Dionysis Bochtis, 2024. "Carbon Farming: Bridging Technology Development with Policy Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-18, February.
    7. Anna Kocira & Mariola Staniak, 2021. "Weed Ecology and New Approaches for Management," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-6, March.
    8. Thaddeo Kahigwa Tibasiima & Deous Mary Ekyaligonza & John Patrick Kanahe Kagorora & Jürgen Kurt Friedel & Andreas Melcher & Bosco Bwambale & Edwin Akugizibwe & Bernhard Freyer, 2023. "Impact of Integrating Annual and Perennial Legumes under Coffea arabica on Sloping Land," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-16, January.
    9. Asbjørn Aaheim & Taoyuan Wei & Bård Romstad, 2017. "Conflicts of economic interests by limiting global warming to +3 °C," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 22(8), pages 1131-1148, December.
    10. Harimenja Razafintsalama & Marie Sauvadet & Jean Trap & Patrice Autfray & Aude Ripoche & Thierry Becquer, 2021. "Legume Nitrogen Fixation and Symbioses in Low-Inputs Rainfed Rice Rotations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-14, November.
    11. Ciscar, Juan-Carlos & Feyen, Luc & Soria, Antonio & Lavalle, Carlo & Raes, Frank & Perry, Miles & Nemry, Françoise & Demirel, Hande & Rozsai, Máté & Dosio, Alessandro & Donatelli, Marcello & Srivastav, 2014. "Climate Impacts in Europe - The JRC PESETA II Project," MPRA Paper 55725, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Francesco Lamperti & Andrea Roventini, 2022. "Beyond climate economics orthodoxy: impacts and policies in the agent-based integrated-assessment DSK model," European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, Edward Elgar Publishing, vol. 19(3), pages 357-380, December.
    13. Sadeeka L. Jayasinghe & Dean T. Thomas & Jonathan P. Anderson & Chao Chen & Ben C. T. Macdonald, 2023. "Global Application of Regenerative Agriculture: A Review of Definitions and Assessment Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-49, November.
    14. Stanisław Sienkiewicz & Piotr Jarosław Żarczyński & Jadwiga Wierzbowska & Sławomir Józef Krzebietke, 2024. "The Impact of Long-Term Fallowing on the Yield and Quality of Winter Rape and Winter and Spring Wheat," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, April.
    15. Valentina Quintarelli & Emanuele Radicetti & Enrica Allevato & Silvia Rita Stazi & Ghulam Haider & Zainul Abideen & Safia Bibi & Aftab Jamal & Roberto Mancinelli, 2022. "Cover Crops for Sustainable Cropping Systems: A Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-21, December.
    16. Katarzyna Panasiewicz, 2022. "Chemical Composition of Lupin ( Lupinus spp.) as Influenced by Variety and Tillage System," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-13, February.
    17. Yeboah, Samuel, 2023. "Unlocking the Potential of Technological Innovations for Sustainable Agriculture in Developing Countries: Enhancing Resource Efficiency and Environmental Sustainability," MPRA Paper 118216, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 04 Aug 2023.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:20:p:14829-:d:1258855. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.