IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i17p12735-d1222936.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Landscape and Horticultural Fertigation Using Roof-Derived Storm Water: The Potential Multiple Benefits of Blue Green Roof Installations

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen Coupe

    (Centre for Agroecology, Water and Resilience, Coventry University, Wolston Lane, Coventry CV8 3LG, UK)

  • Dalrene James

    (Centre for Agroecology, Water and Resilience, Coventry University, Wolston Lane, Coventry CV8 3LG, UK)

  • Alan P. Newman

    (Centre for Agroecology, Water and Resilience, Coventry University, Wolston Lane, Coventry CV8 3LG, UK)

  • Liz Trenchard

    (Centre for Agroecology, Water and Resilience, Coventry University, Wolston Lane, Coventry CV8 3LG, UK)

Abstract

A contribution to the sustainable management of storm water is the use of sustainable drainage (SuDS)-derived water as an unconventional source for irrigation. If storm-water runoff contains dissolved nutrients in excess of those found in conventional irrigation, reusing this water can contribute to the nutrient demands of horticulture or landscaping, which is known as “fertigation”. Green roofs are SuDS devices, and those with below-substrate water storage, blue green roofs, can be additional water sources. The nutrients released from a roof-substrate-growing medium could contribute to the growth of crop and landscape plants, but materials from blue green roofs must not release residues harmful to fertigated plants or receiving soils. This plant growth experiment examined the effects of water from a blue green roof on plant growth and health and the effects on soil and roof-harvested water when functioning as a nutrient-rich irrigation source. Tomatoes and ryegrass were used as examples of horticultural and landscaping plants, respectively. Blue green roof water was compared with potable water irrigation. The blue-green-roof-derived water provided a distinct growth advantage for tomatoes and lower sodium in fruits than tap water, at 285 mg/kg and 636 mg/kg, respectively. For ryegrass, the differences were minimal, but there was no disadvantage to using roof water for fertigation. Following three years of a blue green roof’s operational life, export of inorganic nutrients from the roof, local storage, and then application to plants were effective in contributing additional fertiliser.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen Coupe & Dalrene James & Alan P. Newman & Liz Trenchard, 2023. "Landscape and Horticultural Fertigation Using Roof-Derived Storm Water: The Potential Multiple Benefits of Blue Green Roof Installations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-15, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:17:p:12735-:d:1222936
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/17/12735/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/17/12735/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Głąb, Tomasz & Szewczyk, Wojciech & Gondek, Krzysztof & Mierzwa-Hersztek, Monika & Palmowska, Joanna & Nęcka, Krzysztof, 2020. "Optimization of turfgrass fertigation rate and frequency," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    2. Susanne Charlesworth & Frank Warwick & Craig Lashford, 2016. "Decision-Making and Sustainable Drainage: Design and Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-11, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elisabeth A. Shrimpton & Dexter Hunt & Chris D.F. Rogers, 2021. "Justice in (English) Water Infrastructure: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Andrea Nóblega Carriquiry & David Sauri & Hug March, 2020. "Community Involvement in the Implementation of Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SUDSs): The Case of Bon Pastor, Barcelona," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-19, January.
    3. Giulio Senes & Paolo Stefano Ferrario & Gianpaolo Cirone & Natalia Fumagalli & Paolo Frattini & Giovanna Sacchi & Giorgio Valè, 2021. "Nature-Based Solutions for Storm Water Management—Creation of a Green Infrastructure Suitability Map as a Tool for Land-Use Planning at the Municipal Level in the Province of Monza-Brianza (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, May.
    4. Moises Failache & Nívea Pons & Osni Pejon & Lázaro Zuquette, 2022. "Suitability Zoning for Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDSs): Application in a Basin in Southern Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-29, February.
    5. Che, Zheng & Wang, Jun & Li, Jiusheng, 2022. "Modeling strategies to balance salt leaching and nitrogen loss for drip irrigation with saline water in arid regions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    6. Outi Tahvonen, 2018. "Scalable Green Infrastructure—The Case of Domestic Private Gardens in Vuores, Finland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, December.
    7. Groenveld, Thomas & Argaman, Amir & Šimůnek, Jiří & Lazarovitch, Naftali, 2021. "Numerical modeling to optimize nitrogen fertigation with consideration of transient drought and nitrogen stress," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    8. Sara Lucía Jiménez Ariza & José Alejandro Martínez & Andrés Felipe Muñoz & Juan Pablo Quijano & Juan Pablo Rodríguez & Luis Alejandro Camacho & Mario Díaz-Granados, 2019. "A Multicriteria Planning Framework to Locate and Select Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SUDS) in Consolidated Urban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-33, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:17:p:12735-:d:1222936. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.