IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i5p2577-d757010.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Suitability Zoning for Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDSs): Application in a Basin in Southern Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Moises Failache

    (Department of Geotechnics, São Carlos School of Engineering (USP-EESC), University of São Paulo, São Carlos 13566-590, Brazil)

  • Nívea Pons

    (Natural Resources Institute, Federal University of Itajubá, Itajubá 37500-903, Brazil)

  • Osni Pejon

    (Department of Geotechnics, São Carlos School of Engineering (USP-EESC), University of São Paulo, São Carlos 13566-590, Brazil)

  • Lázaro Zuquette

    (Department of Geotechnics, São Carlos School of Engineering (USP-EESC), University of São Paulo, São Carlos 13566-590, Brazil)

Abstract

The objective of this study was to propose a set of procedures to assess areas regarding the suitability of sustainable drainage systems (SuDSs) with application in a basin in the urban area of São Carlos (Brazil). The assessment was based on an analysis of 39 attributes reflecting the infiltration conditions that control the functional and constructive aspects of the systems, including subsurface drainability, stability, and groundwater contamination potential, which control the degree of suitability of each plot of land. The data obtained through engineering geological mapping procedures and physical principles were used to characterize the area, which resulted in the division of the basin into five SuDS suitability zones, ranging from favorable to restrictive. The proposed procedures proved to be efficient for analyzing the suitability of different SuDS types and the zoning of an area into terrain units. This approach can help planners identify the most appropriate SuDS types for a given unit, optimize the efficiency/cost relationship, and foresee potential environmental and construction-related challenges. In other words, this procedure enables the assessment of the suitability of SuDSs for different unit terrain types with inexpensive and environmentally efficient technological procedures and resources and can be applied at a fine geographic scale.

Suggested Citation

  • Moises Failache & Nívea Pons & Osni Pejon & Lázaro Zuquette, 2022. "Suitability Zoning for Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDSs): Application in a Basin in Southern Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-29, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2577-:d:757010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2577/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2577/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Susanne Charlesworth & Frank Warwick & Craig Lashford, 2016. "Decision-Making and Sustainable Drainage: Design and Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-11, August.
    2. Ignacio Andrés-Doménech & Jose Anta & Sara Perales-Momparler & Jorge Rodriguez-Hernandez, 2021. "Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems in Spain: A Diagnosis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-22, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elisabeth A. Shrimpton & Dexter Hunt & Chris D.F. Rogers, 2021. "Justice in (English) Water Infrastructure: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Ángela Lara & Leandro del Moral, 2022. "Nature-Based Solutions to Hydro-Climatic Risks: Barriers and Triggers for Their Implementation in Seville (Spain)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-25, June.
    3. Andrea Nóblega Carriquiry & David Sauri & Hug March, 2020. "Community Involvement in the Implementation of Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SUDSs): The Case of Bon Pastor, Barcelona," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-19, January.
    4. Giulio Senes & Paolo Stefano Ferrario & Gianpaolo Cirone & Natalia Fumagalli & Paolo Frattini & Giovanna Sacchi & Giorgio Valè, 2021. "Nature-Based Solutions for Storm Water Management—Creation of a Green Infrastructure Suitability Map as a Tool for Land-Use Planning at the Municipal Level in the Province of Monza-Brianza (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, May.
    5. Stephen Coupe & Dalrene James & Alan P. Newman & Liz Trenchard, 2023. "Landscape and Horticultural Fertigation Using Roof-Derived Storm Water: The Potential Multiple Benefits of Blue Green Roof Installations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-15, August.
    6. Juliana Uribe-Aguado & Sara L. Jiménez-Ariza & María N. Torres & Natalia A. Bernal & Mónica M. Giraldo-González & Juan P. Rodríguez, 2022. "A SUDS Planning Decision Support Tool to Maximize Ecosystem Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-22, April.
    7. Outi Tahvonen, 2018. "Scalable Green Infrastructure—The Case of Domestic Private Gardens in Vuores, Finland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Ana Isabel Abellán García & Noelia Cruz Pérez & Juan C. Santamarta, 2021. "Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems in Spain: Analysis of the Research on SUDS Based on Climatology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-25, June.
    9. Antonio Menéndez Suárez-Inclán & Cristina Allende-Prieto & Jorge Roces-García & Juan P. Rodríguez-Sánchez & Luis A. Sañudo-Fontaneda & Carlos Rey-Mahía & Felipe P. Álvarez-Rabanal, 2022. "Development of a Multicriteria Scheme for the Identification of Strategic Areas for SUDS Implementation: A Case Study from Gijón, Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-20, March.
    10. Sara Lucía Jiménez Ariza & José Alejandro Martínez & Andrés Felipe Muñoz & Juan Pablo Quijano & Juan Pablo Rodríguez & Luis Alejandro Camacho & Mario Díaz-Granados, 2019. "A Multicriteria Planning Framework to Locate and Select Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SUDS) in Consolidated Urban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-33, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2577-:d:757010. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.