IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i16p12214-d1214165.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

High School Students’ Use of Information, Media, and Technology Skills and Multidimensional 21st-Century Skills: An Investigation within the Context of Students, Teachers, and Curricula

Author

Listed:
  • Cigdem Hursen

    (Curriculum and Instruction Department, Ataturk Faculty of Education, Near East University, 99138 Nicosia, Cyprus)

  • Derviş Paşa

    (Independent Researcher, 99010 Nicosia, Cyprus)

  • Hafize Keser

    (Department of Computer and Instructional Technologies, Faculty of Educational Sciences, Ankara University, 0600 Ankara, Turkey
    Retired.)

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine high school students’ information, media, and technology skills and their level of use of multidimensional 21st-century skills. A mixed quantitative and qualitative method was preferred in the study conducted in Northern Cyprus. Quantitative data were obtained from 612 senior high school students, and qualitative data were obtained from teachers and three different curricula. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with 10 teachers in order to determine the in-class activities that teachers carried out to provide information, media, and technology skills. The degree to which the Turkish language and literature, English, and mathematics curricula, which are among the basic courses offered in the senior year of high school, have outcomes for gaining information, media, and technology skills was determined through document analysis. The results obtained from the study revealed that the students’ use of information, media, and technology skills was generally moderate. The students’ use of programming skills, which are among the sub-dimensions of information, media, and technology skills as well as their problem-solving skills, were found to be very inadequate. Students’ use of information and data literacy, communication, and collaboration skills, which are among the sub-dimensions of information, media, and technology skills, were found to be adequate. Similarly, it was concluded that the students’ use of multidimensional 21st-century skills was also adequate. The results revealed that the classroom activities implemented by the teachers were insufficient in developing students’ problem-solving skills in particular. Moreover, the results obtained with respect to curricula revealed that the mathematics curriculum had the highest number of outcomes related to information, media, and technology skills. The Turkish language and literature curriculum had the least number of outcomes related to information, media, and technology skills. The results of the research also revealed that the learning outcomes in the curricula were mostly related to communication and collaboration skills. The skill with the lowest number of related outcomes was found to be problem-solving.

Suggested Citation

  • Cigdem Hursen & Derviş Paşa & Hafize Keser, 2023. "High School Students’ Use of Information, Media, and Technology Skills and Multidimensional 21st-Century Skills: An Investigation within the Context of Students, Teachers, and Curricula," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-21, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:16:p:12214-:d:1214165
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/16/12214/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/16/12214/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Handan ÇAM, 2017. "3rd International conference on social sciences & education research," Journal of Economic and Social Thought, KSP Journals, vol. 4(3), pages 352-353, Seprember.
    2. Ester van Laar & Alexander J. A. M. van Deursen & Jan A. G. M. van Dijk & Jos de Haan, 2020. "Determinants of 21st-Century Skills and 21st-Century Digital Skills for Workers: A Systematic Literature Review," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440199, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vida Lang & Andrej Šorgo, 2024. "Views of Students, Parents, and Teachers on Smartphones and Tablets in the Development of 21st-Century Skills as a Prerequisite for a Sustainable Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-14, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Darima Fotheringham & Michael A. Wiles, 2023. "The effect of implementing chatbot customer service on stock returns: an event study analysis," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 802-822, July.
    2. Veronika Bikse & Liva Grinevica & Baiba Rivza & Peteris Rivza, 2022. "Consequences and Challenges of the Fourth Industrial Revolution and the Impact on the Development of Employability Skills," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-23, June.
    3. Paweł Ziemba & Mateusz Piwowarski & Kesra Nermend, 2023. "Remote Work in Post-Pandemic Reality—Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Teleconferencing Software," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, June.
    4. Tom Lewandowski & Emir Kučević & Stephan Leible & Mathis Poser & Tilo Böhmann, 2023. "Enhancing conversational agents for successful operation: A multi-perspective evaluation approach for continuous improvement," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Fatima Afzal & Roksana Jahan Tumpa, 2024. "Exploring Leadership Styles to Foster Sustainability in Construction Projects: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-32, January.
    6. Battisti, Enrico & Alfiero, Simona & Leonidou, Erasmia, 2022. "Remote working and digital transformation during the COVID-19 pandemic: Economic–financial impacts and psychological drivers for employees," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 38-50.
    7. Brady D. Lund & Ting Wang & Nishith Reddy Mannuru & Bing Nie & Somipam Shimray & Ziang Wang, 2023. "ChatGPT and a new academic reality: Artificial Intelligence‐written research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(5), pages 570-581, May.
    8. Jana Stofkova & Adela Poliakova & Katarina Repkova Stofkova & Peter Malega & Matej Krejnus & Vladimira Binasova & Naqibullah Daneshjo, 2022. "Digital Skills as a Significant Factor of Human Resources Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-18, October.
    9. Christian Stary, 2023. "Digital Process Twins as Intelligent Design Technology for Engineering Metaverse/XR Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-23, November.
    10. Helsper, Ellen & Schneider, Luc & van Deursen, Alexander J. A. M. & van Laar, Ester, 2020. "The youth skills digital indicator: report on the conceptualisation and development of the ySkills digital skills measure," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 108878, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Annika Kreuder & Ulrich Frick & Katrin Rakoczy & Sabine J. Schlittmeier, 2024. "Digital competence in adolescents and young adults: a critical analysis of concomitant variables, methodologies and intervention strategies," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, December.
    12. Mario Grande-de-Prado & Ruth Cañón & Sheila García-Martín & Isabel Cantón, 2020. "Digital Competence and Gender: Teachers in Training. A Case Study," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-15, November.
    13. Ikenna Franklin Eze & Chux Gervase Iwu & Jobo Dubihlela, 2022. "Lecturers' perspectives concerning the variables that hinder critical thinking development in the classroom," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 11(10), pages 341-349, December.
    14. Thai Ha Nguyen & Lena Waizenegger & Angsana A. Techatassanasoontorn, 2022. "“Don’t Neglect the User!” – Identifying Types of Human-Chatbot Interactions and their Associated Characteristics," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 797-838, June.
    15. Maria José Sá & Ana Isabel Santos & Sandro Serpa & Carlos Miguel Ferreira, 2021. "Digitainability—Digital Competences Post-COVID-19 for a Sustainable Society," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-22, August.
    16. Denise Rousseau & Byeong Jo Kim & Ryan Splenda & Sarah Young & Jangbum Lee & Donna Beck, 2023. "Does chief executive compensation predict financial performance or inaccurate financial reporting in listed companies: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(4), December.
    17. Rosa M. Serrano & Oscar Casanova, 2022. "Toward a Technological and Methodological Shift in Music Learning in Spain: Students’ Perception of Their Initial Teacher Training," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440211, January.
    18. Surbhi & Sarita Anand, 2019. "Notes From the Field: Using Grassroots Comics to Break the Silence on Menstruation," Indian Journal of Gender Studies, Centre for Women's Development Studies, vol. 26(1-2), pages 171-182, February.
    19. Cátia Rosário & Celeste Varum & Anabela Botelho, 2024. "Comparison of the Profile of Portuguese Companies That Receive Public Support for Innovation: National Support vs. European Support," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-23, March.
    20. Fanny Kovaleski & Claudia Tania Picinin & João Luiz Kovaleski, 2022. "The Challenges of Technology Transfer in the Industry 4.0 Era Regarding Anthropotechnological Aspects: A Systematic Review," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:16:p:12214-:d:1214165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.