IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pop/procee/v12y2024313-324.html

Risks and opportunities of smart education

Author

Listed:
  • Diana-Maria GROSU

    (Universitatea Alexandru Ioan Cuza Iași, România)

Abstract

Smart education integrates technology into teaching and learning, which can provide challenges for both students and teachers. The aim of the study is to show the impact of intelligent education on student learning, as well as the effect it has on the teacher’s new way of teaching. The research objectives refer to identifying the risks of technology in education, as well as highlight the opportunities that pupils/students can achieve due to digitalization of education. The study is important because technology has clearly changed the approach to education in recent years. Smart education has evolved significantly in the last five years with the emergence of COVID-19, when schools and universities have had to continue their schooling using technology. The educational system, regardless of the state, has undergone changes in the institutional organization (digital equipment in classrooms) and in the organization of the teaching act (online tutoring, online courses). The study represents an in-depth analysis of a current topic, and the quantitative research is conducted with reference to fields such as sociology, political science, education, geography, psychology, and technology. In conclusion, intelligent education enters education with both risks and opportunities. It requires today's teacher to be multifunctional, both using technology, becoming creative and being a good psychologist. Nowadays, it is a big challenge for a teacher to maintain students' interest in the classroom, as they have had access to the internet from an early age and know more and more things. On the other hand, technology-enhanced learning often integrates interactive elements, which can increase student engagement and motivation. Smart education is not only about the technology used in classrooms, but also about modern teaching-learning methods and adapting teaching projects to the level of the students.

Suggested Citation

  • Diana-Maria GROSU, 2024. "Risks and opportunities of smart education," Smart Cities International Conference (SCIC) Proceedings, Smart-EDU Hub, Faculty of Public Administration, National University of Political Studies & Public Administration, vol. 12, pages 313-324, september.
    • Handle: RePEc:pop:procee:v:12:y:2024:313-324
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://scrd.eu/index.php/scic/article/view/700/728
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://scrd.eu/index.php/scic/article/view/700
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert G. Hollands, 2008. "Will the real smart city please stand up?," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(3), pages 303-320, December.
    2. Ester van Laar & Alexander J. A. M. van Deursen & Jan A. G. M. van Dijk & Jos de Haan, 2020. "Determinants of 21st-Century Skills and 21st-Century Digital Skills for Workers: A Systematic Literature Review," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440199, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Constance Carr & Markus Hesse, 2020. "When Alphabet Inc. Plans Toronto’s Waterfront: New Post-Political Modes of Urban Governance," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(1), pages 69-83.
    2. Ebru Tekin Bilbil, 2017. "The Operationalizing Aspects of Smart Cities: the Case of Turkey’s Smart Strategies," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 8(3), pages 1032-1048, September.
    3. Tuba Bakıcı & Esteve Almirall & Jonathan Wareham, 2013. "A Smart City Initiative: the Case of Barcelona," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 4(2), pages 135-148, June.
    4. Coletta, Claudio & Heaphy, Liam & Kitchin, Rob, 2017. "From the accidental to articulated smart city: The creation and work of ‘Smart Dublin’," SocArXiv 93ga5, Center for Open Science.
    5. Andrew Clarke & Lynda Cheshire, 2018. "The post-political state? The role of administrative reform in managing tensions between urban growth and liveability in Brisbane, Australia," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(16), pages 3545-3562, December.
    6. Stefano D’Angelo & Angelo Cavallo & Antonio Ghezzi & Francesco Di Lorenzo, 2024. "Understanding corporate entrepreneurship in the digital age: a review and research agenda," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(12), pages 3719-3774, December.
    7. Paola Panuccio, 2019. "Smart Planning: From City to Territorial System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-15, December.
    8. Vu, Khuong & Hartley, Kris, 2018. "Promoting smart cities in developing countries: Policy insights from Vietnam," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(10), pages 845-859.
    9. Maria Vincenza Ciasullo & Orlando Troisi & Mara Grimaldi & Daniele Leone, 2020. "Multi-level governance for sustainable innovation in smart communities: an ecosystems approach," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 1167-1195, December.
    10. Thierry Côme & Stephane Magne & Alexandre Steyer, 2019. "To Be or Not to Be a Smart City: An Empirical Study of the Innovations Highlighted on City Websites [Être ou ne pas être une smart city : une étude empirique des innovations valorisées sur le site web des villes]," Post-Print hal-05522417, HAL.
    11. Anthony Simonofski & Estefanía Serral Asensio & Johannes Smedt & Monique Snoeck, 2019. "Hearing the Voice of Citizens in Smart City Design: The CitiVoice Framework," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 61(6), pages 665-678, December.
    12. Fanny E. Berigüete & José S. Santos & Inma Rodriguez Cantalapiedra, 2024. "Digital Revolution: Emerging Technologies for Enhancing Citizen Engagement in Urban and Environmental Management," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-42, November.
    13. Ida Skubis & Radosław Wolniak & Wiesław Wes Grebski, 2024. "AI and Human-Centric Approach in Smart Cities Management: Case Studies from Silesian and Lesser Poland Voivodships," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-26, September.
    14. Leslie Quitzow & Friederike Rohde, 2022. "Imagining the smart city through smart grids? Urban energy futures between technological experimentation and the imagined low-carbon city," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(2), pages 341-359, February.
    15. Kevin Morgan & Brian Webb, 2020. "Googling the City: In Search of the Public Interest on Toronto’s ‘Smart’ Waterfront," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(1), pages 84-95.
    16. Kummitha, Rama Krishna Reddy & Crutzen, Nathalie, 2019. "Smart cities and the citizen-driven internet of things: A qualitative inquiry into an emerging smart city," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 44-53.
    17. Muhammad Atiq Ur Rehman Tariq & Alavaiola Faumatu & Maha Hussein & Muhammad Laiq Ur Rahman Shahid & Nitin Muttil, 2020. "Smart City-Ranking of Major Australian Cities to Achieve a Smarter Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, April.
    18. Sabina Baraniewicz-Kotasińska, 2022. "The Scandinavian Third Way as a Proposal for Sustainable Smart City Development—A Case Study of Aarhus City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-24, March.
    19. Agnieszka Starzyk & Kinga Rybak-Niedziółka & Janusz Marchwiński & Ewa Rykała & Elena Lucchi, 2023. "Spatial Relations between the Theatre and Its Surroundings: An Assessment Protocol on the Example of Warsaw (Poland)," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-18, June.
    20. Johannes Stübinger & Lucas Schneider, 2020. "Understanding Smart City—A Data-Driven Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-23, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • O35 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Social Innovation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pop:procee:v:12:y:2024:313-324. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Professor Catalin Vrabie (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fasnsro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.