IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i14p11107-d1195533.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of Corporate Water Disclosure in Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Indah Fajarini Sri Wahyuningrum

    (Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang 50229, Indonesia)

  • Amin Chegenizadeh

    (School of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia)

  • Ain Hajawiyah

    (Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang 50229, Indonesia)

  • Sriningsih Sriningsih

    (Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang 50229, Indonesia)

  • Sri Utami

    (Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang 50229, Indonesia)

  • Mochamad Arief Budihardjo

    (Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang 50275, Indonesia
    Environmental Sustainability Research Group, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang 50275, Indonesia)

  • Hamid Nikraz

    (School of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia)

Abstract

Water information disclosure by companies in Indonesia has become an important commitment to safeguarding water resources and taking responsibility for the environment and stakeholders. This study has two objectives. First, it investigates the extent of water information disclosed by manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange. Second, this study investigates the determinants that affect the disclosure of water information. Water information disclosure is analyzed using content analysis based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI)-G4, the CDP’s 2020 Water Safety Questionnaires, and indicators used in previous research. This study uses data from the annual reports and sustainability reports of manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2017 to 2020. The determinants tested in this study include the existence of a CSR committee, board independence, government ownership, profitability, company size, and industry type. These findings indicate that companies with CSR committees disclose less water information. Meanwhile, share ownership by the government has a significantly positive effect on water information disclosure. The variables—board independence, profitability, company size, and industry type—do not affect water information disclosure. This study contributes to the literature by providing a comprehensive perspective on water information disclosure in Indonesia.

Suggested Citation

  • Indah Fajarini Sri Wahyuningrum & Amin Chegenizadeh & Ain Hajawiyah & Sriningsih Sriningsih & Sri Utami & Mochamad Arief Budihardjo & Hamid Nikraz, 2023. "Determinants of Corporate Water Disclosure in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-17, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:11107-:d:1195533
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/11107/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/11107/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James Hazelton, 2013. "Accounting as a human right: the case of water information," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 26(2), pages 267-311, February.
    2. Zhang, Linhan & Tang, Qingliang & Huang, Robin Hui, 2021. "Mind the Gap: Is Water Disclosure a Missing Component of Corporate Social Responsibility?," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(1).
    3. Muhammad Aminu Isa & Sabo Muhammad, 2015. "The Impact of Board Characteristics on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Evidence from Nigerian Food Product Firms," International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 1(12), pages 34-45, November.
    4. Huixiang Zeng & Tao Zhang & Zhifang Zhou & Yang Zhao & Xiaohong Chen, 2020. "Water disclosure and firm risk: Empirical evidence from highly water‐sensitive industries in China," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 17-38, January.
    5. Xuhui Peng & Yi-Chen Lan & Jingduan Li & Hanlu Fan, 2023. "Board gender diversity, national culture, and water disclosure of multinational corporations," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(14), pages 1581-1602, March.
    6. James Hazelton, 2013. "Accounting as a human right: the case of water information," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 26(2), pages 267-311, February.
    7. repec:eme:ijoes0:ijoes-05-2017-0071 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. repec:eme:aaaj00:09513571311303738 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Nagalingam Nagendrakumar & Kalubowilage Navodya Nilupulee Alwis & Udage Arachchige Kaveesha Eshani & Seekku Baduge Ushani Kaushalya, 2022. "The Impact of Sustainability Practices on the Going Concern of the Travel and Tourism Industry: Evidence from Developed and Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-21, December.
    10. Walid Ben‐Amar & Mohamed Chelli, 2018. "What drives voluntary corporate water disclosures? The effect of country‐level institutions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1609-1622, December.
    11. repec:eme:aaaj00:09513579610109987 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Indah Fajarini Sri Wahyuningrum & Mochamad Arief Budihardjo & Fadel Iqbal Muhammad & Hadrian Geri Djajadikerta & Terri Trireksani, 2020. "Do environmental and financial performances affect environmental disclosures? Evidence from listed companies in Indonesia," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(2), pages 1047-1061, December.
    13. David Hackston & Markus J. Milne, 1996. "Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand companies," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 9(1), pages 77-108, March.
    14. Kamran Ahmed & Mahmud Hossain & Mike B. Adams, 2006. "The Effects of Board Composition and Board Size on the Informativeness of Annual Accounting Earnings," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(5), pages 418-431, September.
    15. Cheng-Li Huang & Fan-Hua Kung, 2010. "Drivers of Environmental Disclosure and Stakeholder Expectation: Evidence from Taiwan," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 96(3), pages 435-451, October.
    16. Tiyas Kurnia Sari & Fitra Roman Cahaya & Corina Joseph, 2021. "Coercive Pressures and Anti-corruption Reporting: The Case of ASEAN Countries," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 171(3), pages 495-511, July.
    17. Deegan, Craig, 2017. "Twenty five years of social and environmental accounting research within Critical Perspectives of Accounting: Hits, misses and ways forward," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 65-87.
    18. Silvia Cantele & Thomas A. Tsalis & Ioannis E. Nikolaou, 2018. "A New Framework for Assessing the Sustainability Reporting Disclosure of Water Utilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-12, February.
    19. Azlan Amran & S. Susela Devi, 2008. "The impact of government and foreign affiliate influence on corporate social reporting: The case of Malaysia," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 23(4), pages 386-404, April.
    20. Stephen Brammer & Stephen Pavelin, 2008. "Factors influencing the quality of corporate environmental disclosure," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 17(2), pages 120-136, February.
    21. Cheng, Eugene C.M. & Courtenay, Stephen M., 2006. "Response to discussion of "board composition, regulatory regime and voluntary disclosure"," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 293-294.
    22. Cheng, Eugene C.M. & Courtenay, Stephen M., 2006. "Board composition, regulatory regime and voluntary disclosure," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 262-289.
    23. repec:eme:maj000:02686900810864327 is not listed on IDEAS
    24. Akrum Helfaya & Tantawy Moussa, 2017. "Do Board's Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy and Orientation Influence Environmental Sustainability Disclosure? UK Evidence," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(8), pages 1061-1077, December.
    25. Astrid Rudyanto & Sylvia Veronica Siregar, 2018. "The effect of stakeholder pressure and corporate governance on the sustainability report quality," International Journal of Ethics and Systems, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 34(2), pages 233-249, May.
    26. Nazim Hussain & Ugo Rigoni & René P. Orij, 2018. "Corporate Governance and Sustainability Performance: Analysis of Triple Bottom Line Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 149(2), pages 411-432, May.
    27. Carmelo Reverte, 2009. "Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure Ratings by Spanish Listed Firms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 88(2), pages 351-366, August.
    28. Juniati Gunawan, 2016. "Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives in a Regulated and Emerging Country: An Indonesia Perspective," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Samuel O. Idowu (ed.), Key Initiatives in Corporate Social Responsibility, chapter 0, pages 325-340, Springer.
    29. Hui-Cheng Yu & Lopin Kuo & Beiling Ma, 2020. "The Drivers of Corporate Water Disclosure in Enhancing Information Transparency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, January.
    30. Azlan Amran & S. Susela Devi, 2008. "The impact of government and foreign affiliate influence on corporate social reporting," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 23(4), pages 386-404, April.
    31. Belen Fernandez-Feijoo & Silvia Romero & Silvia Ruiz, 2014. "Effect of Stakeholders’ Pressure on Transparency of Sustainability Reports within the GRI Framework," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 122(1), pages 53-63, June.
    32. Manuel Branco & Lúcia Rodrigues, 2008. "Factors Influencing Social Responsibility Disclosure by Portuguese Companies," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 83(4), pages 685-701, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. María Luisa Pajuelo Moreno & Teresa Duarte-Atoche, 2019. "Relationship between Sustainable Disclosure and Performance—An Extension of Ullmann’s Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-33, August.
    2. Liu, Chengyun & Su, Kun & Zhang, Miaomiao, 2021. "Water disclosure and financial reporting quality for social changes: Empirical evidence from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    3. Giovanna Gavana & Pietro Gottardo & Anna Maria Moisello, 2016. "Sustainability Reporting in Family Firms: A Panel Data Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Giuliana Birindelli & Stefano Dell’Atti & Antonia Patrizia Iannuzzi & Marco Savioli, 2018. "Composition and Activity of the Board of Directors: Impact on ESG Performance in the Banking System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Waris Ali & Jedrzej George Frynas & Zeeshan Mahmood, 2017. "Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Disclosure in Developed and Developing Countries: A Literature Review," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(4), pages 273-294, July.
    6. Silvia Ruiz & Silvia Romero & Belen Fernandez‐Feijoo, 2021. "Stakeholder engagement is evolving: Do investors play a main role?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 1105-1120, February.
    7. Abdalla Shwairef & Azlan Amran & Mohammad Iranmanesh & Noor Hazlina Ahmad, 2021. "The mediating effect of strategic posture on corporate governance and environmental reporting," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 349-378, February.
    8. Justyna Dyduch & Joanna Krasodomska, 2017. "Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: An Empirical Study of Polish Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-24, October.
    9. Ntim, Collins G., 2016. "Corporate governance, corporate health accounting, and firm value: The case of HIV/AIDS disclosures in Sub-Saharan Africa," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 155-216.
    10. Muhammad Kaleem Khan & R. M. Ammar Zahid & Adil Saleem & Judit Sági, 2021. "Board Composition and Social & Environmental Accountability: A Dynamic Model Analysis of Chinese Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-18, September.
    11. Elisa Menicucci & Guido Paolucci, 2022. "Board Diversity and ESG Performance: Evidence from the Italian Banking Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-19, October.
    12. Bart Manning & Geert Braam & Daniel Reimsbach, 2019. "Corporate governance and sustainable business conduct—Effects of board monitoring effectiveness and stakeholder engagement on corporate sustainability performance and disclosure choices," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(2), pages 351-366, March.
    13. Lopatta, Kerstin & Tideman, Sebastian A. & Scheil, Carolin & Makarem, Naser, 2023. "The current state of corporate human rights disclosure of the global top 500 business enterprises: Measurement and determinants," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    14. Mohammad A. A. Zaid & Sara T. F. Abuhijleh & María Consuelo Pucheta‐Martínez, 2020. "Ownership structure, stakeholder engagement, and corporate social responsibility policies: The moderating effect of board independence," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3), pages 1344-1360, May.
    15. Tzu-Kuan Chiu & Yi-Hsin Wang, 2015. "Determinants of Social Disclosure Quality in Taiwan: An Application of Stakeholder Theory," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 129(2), pages 379-398, June.
    16. Vitiana L'Abate & Filippo Vitolla & Paolo Esposito & Nicola Raimo, 2023. "The drivers of sustainability disclosure practices in the airport industry: A legitimacy theory perspective," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(4), pages 1903-1916, July.
    17. Waris Ali & Maha Faisal Alsayegh & Zubair Ahmad & Zeeshan Mahmood & Javed Iqbal, 2018. "The Relationship between Social Visibility and CSR Disclosure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-32, March.
    18. Mohammad Jizi, 2017. "The Influence of Board Composition on Sustainable Development Disclosure," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(5), pages 640-655, July.
    19. Mahadeo, Jyoti Devi & Oogarah-Hanuman, Vanisha & Soobaroyen, Teerooven, 2011. "Changes in social and environmental reporting practices in an emerging economy (2004–2007): Exploring the relevance of stakeholder and legitimacy theories," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 158-175.
    20. Ewelina Zarzycka & Joanna Krasodomska, 2021. "Environmental key performance indicators: the role of regulations and stakeholder influence," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 41(4), pages 651-666, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:11107-:d:1195533. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.