IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i12p9605-d1171595.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stakeholder Perspectives on Supply Chain Risks: The Case of Indonesian Palm Oil Industry in West Papua

Author

Listed:
  • Soleman Imbiri

    (UniSA STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics), University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
    Department of Social Economic of Agriculture, University of Papua, Manokwari 98314, Indonesia)

  • Raufdeen Rameezdeen

    (UniSA STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics), University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia)

  • Nicholas Chileshe

    (UniSA STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics), University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia)

  • Larissa Statsenko

    (UniSA STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics), University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia)

Abstract

Stakeholder perspectives on supply chain risks (SCRs) play a crucial role in managing risks, achieving goals, and determining performance of an organization. Herein, the role of stakeholders and the complex interrelationships between stakeholders are important factors influencing the supply chain, and, besides, failure to manage SCRs can result in significant losses for the organization. In West Papua, study related to stakeholder perspectives on the risks in palm oil SCs is still limited. Accordingly, to fill this gap, this paper aims to identify SCRs from the perspectives of key stakeholder of the Indonesian palm oil industry in West Papua. This study employs qualitative research methods. Key risks in the palm oil supply chain (SC) were identified from semi-structured interviews with 64 key stakeholders across 25 different stakeholder groups, using NVIVO software for thematic analysis. The results show that the palm oil SC in West Papua has five tiers and five distribution channels of material, information, and financial flows. Public and private stakeholders identified in palm oil SCs play crucial roles in determining palm oil operations in West Papua. Herein, there are seven identified groups as key stakeholders with thirty-two major risks in the SC. Smallholder farmers are exposed to most of the risks, followed by plantation companies, local cooperatives, and government agencies. Interestingly, risks in palm oil SCs in West Papua are predominantly caused by conflicts of interest among multiple stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Soleman Imbiri & Raufdeen Rameezdeen & Nicholas Chileshe & Larissa Statsenko, 2023. "Stakeholder Perspectives on Supply Chain Risks: The Case of Indonesian Palm Oil Industry in West Papua," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-24, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:12:p:9605-:d:1171595
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/12/9605/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/12/9605/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tang, Christopher S. & Davarzani, Hoda & Sarkis, Joseph, 2015. "Quantitative models for managing supply chain risks: A reviewAuthor-Name: Fahimnia, Behnam," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(1), pages 1-15.
    2. G. Behzadi & M.J. O’Sullivan & T.L. Olsen & A. Zhang, 2018. "Allocation flexibility for agribusiness supply chains under market demand disruption," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(10), pages 3524-3546, May.
    3. Ratna Wardhani & Yan Rahadian, 2021. "Sustainability strategy of Indonesian and Malaysian palm oil industry: a qualitative analysis," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(5), pages 1077-1107, May.
    4. Anna Scolobig & Johan Lilliestam, 2016. "Comparing Approaches for the Integration of Stakeholder Perspectives in Environmental Decision Making," Resources, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-16, November.
    5. Soleman Imbiri & Raufdeen Rameezdeen & Nicholas Chileshe & Larissa Statsenko, 2021. "A Novel Taxonomy for Risks in Agribusiness Supply Chains: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-24, August.
    6. Ratna Wardhani & Yan Rahadian, 2021. "Sustainability strategy of Indonesian and Malaysian palm oil industry: a qualitative analysis," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(5), pages 1077-1107, May.
    7. Samantha Miles, 2017. "Stakeholder Theory Classification: A Theoretical and Empirical Evaluation of Definitions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 142(3), pages 437-459, May.
    8. Yi Quan & Huiying Wu & Sihai Li & Sammy Xiaoyan Ying, 2018. "Firm sustainable development and stakeholder engagement: The role of government support," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1145-1158, December.
    9. Caleb Gallemore & Kristjan Jespersen, 2019. "Offsetting, Insetting, or Both? Current Trends in Sustainable Palm Oil Certification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-15, September.
    10. Patchara Phochanikorn & Chunqiao Tan, 2019. "An Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model Based on Prospect Theory for Green Supplier Selection under Uncertain Environment: A Case Study of the Thailand Palm Oil Products Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-22, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muryani Muryani & Khoirun Nisa’ & Miguel Angel Esquivias & Siti Hafsah Zulkarnain, 2023. "Strategies to Control Industrial Emissions: An Analytical Network Process Approach in East Java, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Pratibha Wasan & Ashwani Kumar & Sunil Luthra, 2023. "How can banks and finance companies incorporate value chain factors in their risk management strategy? The case of agro‐food firms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 858-877, January.
    3. Behzadi, Golnar & O’Sullivan, Michael Justin & Olsen, Tava Lennon, 2020. "On metrics for supply chain resilience," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(1), pages 145-158.
    4. Arivintharan Chalvantharan & Chun Hsion Lim & Denny K. S. Ng, 2023. "Economic Feasibility and Water Footprint Analysis for Smart Irrigation Systems in Palm Oil Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-14, May.
    5. Soleman Imbiri & Raufdeen Rameezdeen & Nicholas Chileshe & Larissa Statsenko, 2021. "A Novel Taxonomy for Risks in Agribusiness Supply Chains: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-24, August.
    6. Jaime-Andres Correa-Garcia & Maria-Antonia Garcia-Benau & Emma Garcia-Meca, 2018. "CSR Communication Strategies of Colombian Business Groups: An Analysis of Corporate Reports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-19, May.
    7. Svana Helen Björnsdóttir & Pall Jensson & Saemundur E. Thorsteinsson & Ioannis M. Dokas & Helgi Thor Ingason, 2023. "Aligning Stakeholders and Actors: A New Safety and Security-Based Design Approach for Major National Infrastructures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-44, December.
    8. Ani V. Ter-Mkrtchyan & Aimee L. Franklin, 2023. "Stakeholder Analysis in the Context of Natural Disaster Mitigation: The Case of Flooding in Three U.S. Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-13, October.
    9. Carina Mueller & Christopher West & Mairon G. Bastos Lima & Bob Doherty, 2023. "Demand-Side Actors in Agricultural Supply Chain Sustainability: An Assessment of Motivations for Action, Implementation Challenges, and Research Frontiers," World, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-20, September.
    10. Dmitry Ivanov, 2022. "Viable supply chain model: integrating agility, resilience and sustainability perspectives—lessons from and thinking beyond the COVID-19 pandemic," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 1411-1431, December.
    11. Ghanei, Shima & Contreras, Ivan & Cordeau, Jean-François, 2023. "A two-stage stochastic collaborative intertwined supply network design problem under multiple disruptions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    12. Fan, Yingjie & Schwartz, Frank & Voß, Stefan, 2017. "Flexible supply chain planning based on variable transportation modes," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PC), pages 654-666.
    13. Anup Kumar & Santosh Kumar Shrivastav & Avinash K. Shrivastava & Rashmi Ranjan Panigrahi & Abbas Mardani & Fausto Cavallaro, 2023. "Sustainable Supply Chain Management, Performance Measurement, and Management: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-25, March.
    14. Eunice Kabahinda & Rogers Mwesigwa, 2023. "Trust Mediates the Relationship Between Stakeholder Behavior and Stakeholder Management of Public Private Partnership Projects in Uganda," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 245-263, March.
    15. Salik Uddin Ahmed & Amjad Ali & Abdul Hameed Memon & Ahmad Hussain, 2021. "Policy framework for implementation of sustainable procurement practices in healthcare industry," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 3929-3945, March.
    16. Yang, Yuxiang & Goodarzi, Shadi & Jabbarzadeh, Armin & Fahimnia, Behnam, 2022. "In-house production and outsourcing under different emissions reduction regulations: An equilibrium decision model for global supply chains," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    17. Trapero, Juan R. & Cardós, Manuel & Kourentzes, Nikolaos, 2019. "Empirical safety stock estimation based on kernel and GARCH models," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 199-211.
    18. Schembri, Joe & Tang, Yee Kwan & Fletcher, Margaret & Dimitratos, Pavlos, 2019. "How do European trade promotion organisations manage their stakeholders?," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 1-1.
    19. Hou, Yunzhang & Wang, Xiaoling & Wu, Yenchun Jim & He, Peixu, 2018. "How does the trust affect the topology of supply chain network and its resilience? An agent-based approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 229-241.
    20. Nguyen Phong Nguyen & Samuel Adomako, 2021. "Environmental proactivity, competitive strategy, and market performance: The mediating role of environmental reputation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 2008-2020, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:12:p:9605-:d:1171595. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.