IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i12p9217-d1165699.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Fairness and Influencing Factors of the Spatial Distribution of Public Services in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei

Author

Listed:
  • Hui Shao

    (School of Economics and Resource Management, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Siqi Lv

    (Development and Reform Commission of Qujing City, Qujing 655011, China)

  • Chengfeng Cao

    (School of Economics and Resource Management, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

Abstract

Achieving the equalization of public services is one of the main goals of regional highquality development at this stage. It plays an important guiding role in optimizing the spatial pattern of a metropolis. Taking Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei as the research area, this paper used hotspot analysis, spatial measurement, and other methods to conduct quantitative analysis and empirical research based on POI data, census data, etc., to identify regional public service centers and population distribution centers, and compared and matched them. This study built public service evaluation indicators, comprehensively evaluated the public service level of each district and county in the region, established a spatial error model, and empirically analyzed the differences in the comprehensive public service level of 200 districts and counties in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region. The results show that there is a certain degree of mismatch between the comprehensive hotspots of density of public service facilities and the hotspots of permanent populations in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region. The spatial differentiation of the comprehensive level of public services is obvious, showing the characteristics of “high, middle, and low in the north” and “high in the core urban area and low in other districts and counties”. Government policies, economic development level, and the level of urbanization have a significant positive effect on the public service level. The article also discussed the policy implications of the conclusions, as well as corresponding countermeasures and suggestions.

Suggested Citation

  • Hui Shao & Siqi Lv & Chengfeng Cao, 2023. "The Fairness and Influencing Factors of the Spatial Distribution of Public Services in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-17, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:12:p:9217-:d:1165699
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/12/9217/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/12/9217/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael B. Teitz, 1968. "Toward A Theory Of Urban Public Facility Location," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(1), pages 35-51, January.
    2. Alex Michalos & Bruno Zumbo, 1999. "Public Services and the Quality of Life," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 125-157, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alex Michalos, 1999. "Reflections on Twenty-Five Years of Quality-of-Life Research," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(2), pages 119-123.
    2. Meihan Jin & Lu Liu & De Tong & Yongxi Gong & Yu Liu, 2019. "Evaluating the Spatial Accessibility and Distribution Balance of Multi-Level Medical Service Facilities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Parreño, Francisco & Álvarez-Valdés, Ramón & Martí, Rafael, 2021. "Measuring diversity. A review and an empirical analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(2), pages 515-532.
    4. Tobias Wolbring, 2017. "Home Sweet Home! Does Moving Have (Lasting) Effects on Housing Satisfaction?," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 18(5), pages 1359-1375, October.
    5. Alex Michalos, 2003. "Policing Services and the Quality of Life," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 1-18, January.
    6. Raymond Swaray, 2007. "On the Relationship between the Public’s Worry about Safety from Burglary and Probabilities of Burglary: Some Evidence from Simultaneous Equation Models," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 80(2), pages 361-378, January.
    7. Linlin Zhang & Tao Zhou & Chao Mao, 2019. "Does the Difference in Urban Public Facility Allocation Cause Spatial Inequality in Housing Prices? Evidence from Chongqing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-20, November.
    8. Maki, Wilbur R., 1972. "Economic Research Problems And Long-Run Research Needs In Rural Development," Staff Papers 13983, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    9. Martino Tran & Christina Draeger & Xuerou Wang & Abbas Nikbakht, 2023. "Monitoring the well-being of vulnerable transit riders using machine learning based sentiment analysis and social media: Lessons from COVID-19," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(1), pages 60-75, January.
    10. Hanna Gendel-Guterman & Miriam Billig, 2021. "Increasing citizen satisfaction with municipal services: the function of intangible factors," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 18(2), pages 171-186, June.
    11. Xinxin Zhou & Yuan Ding & Changbin Wu & Jing Huang & Chendi Hu, 2019. "Measuring the Spatial Allocation Rationality of Service Facilities of Residential Areas Based on Internet Map and Location-Based Service Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, March.
    12. Shi, Jiangang & Dai, Xingying & Duan, Kaifeng & Li, Jiajia, 2023. "Exploring the performances and determinants of public service provision in 35 major cities in China from the perspectives of efficiency and effectiveness," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    13. Alex Michalos, 2005. "Arts and the quality of life: an Exploratory study," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 71(1), pages 11-59, March.
    14. Ilyes Bougouffa & Ariva Sugandi Permana, 2018. "A Study on the Linkages between Residential Satisfaction and the Overall Quality of Life in Bandar Tun Razak Area of Kuala Lumpur City, Malaysia," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 13(4), pages 991-1013, December.
    15. Luca Zanin, 2013. "Detecting Unobserved Heterogeneity in the Relationship Between Subjective Well-Being and Satisfaction in Various Domains of Life Using the REBUS-PLS Path Modelling Approach: A Case Study," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 110(1), pages 281-304, January.
    16. Foth, Nicole & Manaugh, Kevin & El-Geneidy, Ahmed M., 2013. "Towards equitable transit: examining transit accessibility and social need in Toronto, Canada, 1996–2006," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 1-10.
    17. Bruno Zumbo & Alex Michalos, 2000. "Quality of Life in Jasper, Alberta," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 49(2), pages 121-145, February.
    18. Alex Michalos, 2004. "Social Indicators Research and Health-Related Quality of Life Research," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 65(1), pages 27-72, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:12:p:9217-:d:1165699. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.