IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2022i1p68-d1009921.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of Knowledge Management on Business Processes: Value-Added and Sustainability Perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Zenona Ona Atkočiūnienė

    (Faculty of Creative Industries, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Sauletekio al. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Justas Gribovskis

    (Faculty of Communication, Vilnius University, Universiteto st. 3, LT-01513 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Jurgita Raudeliūnienė

    (Dynamic Management Institute, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Sauletekio al. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania)

Abstract

Knowledge management (KM) practice is increasingly less considered as a supportive activity, as knowledge management processes (KMP) are inseparable from critical business processes (BP). Even though some scientific studies underlined that KM integration into BP are expensive and slow due to many organizational barriers, their sustainable value to organizations is undeniable. Although KMPs’ interactions have been studied in the scientific literature, there is still a lack of comprehensive studies related to knowledge-intensive organizations’ practices on the impact of the whole KM cycle—consisting of knowledge creation, sharing, storage, and application—on BP, such as development, production, and sales, for creating value-added (VA) and sustainability. In order to identify interconnections between individual KMP and BP, this study aimed to evaluate the influence of KMP on BP to support the continuous improvement of BP and the creation of VA in knowledge-intensive organizations. A research model was developed to analyze the impact of KMP on BP and VA perspectives. An empirical study was performed in Lithuanian project management companies that used BP in their operations and involved 144 managers from 72 IT organizations. Survey (structured questionnaire) and statistical analysis methods (one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA); Pearson’s correlation analysis; multiple regression analysis and mediation analysis; cluster analysis and chi-square analysis) were applied in this study. The research results confirmed that every KMP positively affected individual BP, where knowledge creation had the most significant impact. The hypothesis that every KMP positively affected the VA created in an organization was partially confirmed since knowledge sharing and creation had a strong influence. The study demonstrated that KMP as a whole had a positive effect on the central BP, change (improvement) of BP increased VA created in organizations, and BP acted as a mediator of the positive correlation between KMP and the VA. The effectiveness of individual KMP depended on the size of the organization. As a result, the study confirmed that KMP in organizations could not be performed separately and had to be integrated into BP to maximize the VA. The significance of the research model lay not only in its ability to identify the influence of KMP on the VA created in organizations but also in evaluating each KMP individually.

Suggested Citation

  • Zenona Ona Atkočiūnienė & Justas Gribovskis & Jurgita Raudeliūnienė, 2022. "Influence of Knowledge Management on Business Processes: Value-Added and Sustainability Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:68-:d:1009921
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/68/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/68/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maja Vidović, 2010. "The link between the quality of knowledge management and financial performance – The case of Croatia," EFZG Working Papers Series 1003, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb.
    2. Mohsin Shahzad & Ying Qu & Abaid Ullah Zafar & Andrea Appolloni, 2021. "Does the interaction between the knowledge management process and sustainable development practices boost corporate green innovation?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(8), pages 4206-4222, December.
    3. Mirna Kordab & Jurgita Raudeliūnienė & Ieva Meidutė-Kavaliauskienė, 2020. "Mediating Role of Knowledge Management in the Relationship between Organizational Learning and Sustainable Organizational Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-20, December.
    4. M. Shakaib Akram & M. Awais Shakir Goraya & Aneela Malik & Amer M. Aljarallah, 2018. "Organizational Performance and Sustainability: Exploring the Roles of IT Capabilities and Knowledge Management Capabilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, October.
    5. Laitamäki, Jukka & Kordupleski, Raymond, 1997. "Building and deploying profitable growth strategies based on the waterfall of customer value added," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 158-166, April.
    6. Adriana Dima & Alexandru-Mihai Bugheanu & Ruxandra Dinulescu & Ana-Madalina Potcovaru & Constanta Alice Stefanescu & Irinel Marin, 2022. "Exploring the Research Regarding Frugal Innovation and Business Sustainability through Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-36, January.
    7. Mehdi Tajpour & Elahe Hosseini & Maliheh Mohammadi & Behrooz Bahman-Zangi, 2022. "The Effect of Knowledge Management on the Sustainability of Technology-Driven Businesses in Emerging Markets: The Mediating Role of Social Media," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-15, July.
    8. Paschen, Jeannette & Wilson, Matthew & Ferreira, João J., 2020. "Collaborative intelligence: How human and artificial intelligence create value along the B2B sales funnel," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 403-414.
    9. Paolo Gaiardelli & Nicola Saccani & Lucrezia Songini, 2007. "Performance measurement systems in after-sales service: an integrated framework," International Journal of Business Performance Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(2), pages 145-171.
    10. Jurgita Raudeliuniene & Ibrahim Matar, 2022. "Knowledge Management Practice for Sustainable Development in Higher Education Institutions: Women Managers’ Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-13, September.
    11. Dorin Vicentiu Popescu & Adriana Dima & Elena Radu & Ecaterina Milica Dobrota & Victor Marian Dumitrache, 2022. "Bibliometric Analysis of the Green Deal Policies in the Food Chain," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 24(60), pages 410-410, April.
    12. Jurgita Raudeliūnienė & Vida Davidavičienė & Artūras Jakubavičius, 2018. "Knowledge management process model," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 5(3), pages 542-554, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dionisios Koutsantonis & Konstantinos Koutsantonis & Nikolaos P. Bakas & Vagelis Plevris & Andreas Langousis & Savvas A. Chatzichristofis, 2022. "Bibliometric Literature Review of Adaptive Learning Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, October.
    2. Lorena Espina-Romero & Jesús Guerrero-Alcedo & José Gregorio Noroño Sánchez & Angélica Ochoa-Díaz, 2022. "What Are the Topics That Business Ecosystems Navigate? Updating of Scientific Activity and Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Carlo Dindorf & Eva Bartaguiz & Freya Gassmann & Michael Fröhlich, 2022. "Conceptual Structure and Current Trends in Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning Research in Sports: A Bibliometric Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-23, December.
    4. Chanin Yoopetch & Suthep Nimsai & Boonying Kongarchapatara, 2022. "Bibliometric Analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility in Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    5. Jurgita Raudeliuniene & Ibrahim Matar, 2022. "Knowledge Management Practice for Sustainable Development in Higher Education Institutions: Women Managers’ Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-13, September.
    6. Sen Li & Yingying Shi & Lingling Wang & Enjun Xia, 2023. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Brand Orientation Strategy in Digital Marketing: Determinants, Research Perspectives and Evolutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-22, January.
    7. Shi Qiao & Qiankun Wang, 2021. "The Effect of Relational Capital on Organizational Performance in Supply Chain: The Mediating Role of Explicit and Tacit Knowledge Sharing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-17, September.
    8. Mirna Kordab & Jurgita Raudeliūnienė & Ieva Meidutė-Kavaliauskienė, 2020. "Mediating Role of Knowledge Management in the Relationship between Organizational Learning and Sustainable Organizational Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-20, December.
    9. Junjie Li & Guohui Zhan & Xin Dai & Meng Qi & Bangfan Liu, 2022. "Innovation and Optimization Logic of Grassroots Digital Governance in China under Digital Empowerment and Digital Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-28, December.
    10. Md Alamgir Mollah & Jae-Hyeok Choi & Su-Jung Hwang & Jin-Kyo Shin, 2023. "Exploring a Pathway to Sustainable Organizational Performance of South Korea in the Digital Age: The Effect of Digital Leadership on IT Capabilities and Organizational Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-18, May.
    11. Issam Hanafi & Bousselham Samoudi & Ahlem Ben Halima & Laurent Canale, 2022. "Hotspots and Tendencies of Energy Optimization Based on Bibliometric Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-22, December.
    12. Muhammad Farooq & Jie Cheng & Noor Ullah Khan & Roselina Ahmad Saufi & Nagina Kanwal & Hanieh Alipour Bazkiaei, 2022. "Sustainable Waste Management Companies with Innovative Smart Solutions: A Systematic Review and Conceptual Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-19, October.
    13. Maksim S. Kolyasnikov & Natalya R. Kelchevskaya, 2020. "Knowledge management strategies in companies: Trends and the impact of Industry 4.0," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 11(4), pages 82-96, September.
    14. Xingwei Li & Jiachi Dai & Jinrong He & Jingru Li & Yicheng Huang & Xiang Liu & Qiong Shen, 2022. "Mechanism of Enterprise Green Innovation Behavior Considering Coevolution Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-19, August.
    15. Cui Zhang & Xiongjin Feng & Yanzhen Wang, 2022. "Technology Spillovers among Innovation Agents from the Perspective of Network Connectedness," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(16), pages 1-17, August.
    16. Lilian. O. Iheukwumere-Esotu & Akilu Yunusa-Kaltungo, 2021. "Knowledge Criticality Assessment and Codification Framework for Major Maintenance Activities: A Case Study of Cement Rotary Kiln Plant," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-21, April.
    17. Haili Zhang & Yufan Wang & Michael Song, 2019. "Does Competitive Intensity Moderate the Relationships between Sustainable Capabilities and Sustainable Organizational Performance in New Ventures?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, December.
    18. Zahid Yousaf & Brutu Mădălina & Daniela Mihai & Hrestic Maria-Luiza & Ștefan Maria Cristina & Popescu Constantin, 2022. "Pollution Reduction as Catalyst between Environmental Resources Conservation Efforts and Sustainable Development: Investigation of Energy Firms in Circular Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-13, September.
    19. Fakhraddin Maroofi & Mohammad Nazaripour & Shahoo Maaznezhad, 2012. "Investigating the Service Brand, Customers Value and its Perspective," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 2(4), pages 102-118, October.
    20. Mai, Nhat Chi, 2022. "Bibliometric analysis of entrepreneurial marketing during the COVID-19 pandemic," OSF Preprints y8asv, Center for Open Science.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:68-:d:1009921. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.