IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i9p5703-d811299.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pedestrian Safety at Midblock Crossings on Dual Carriageway Roads in Polish Cities

Author

Listed:
  • Piotr Szagala

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Armii Ludowej 16, 00-637 Warszawa, Poland)

  • Andrzej Brzezinski

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Armii Ludowej 16, 00-637 Warszawa, Poland)

  • Mariusz Kiec

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24, 31-155 Krakow, Poland)

  • Marcin Budzynski

    (Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Gdańsk University of Technology, Narutowicza 11/12, 80-233 Gdańsk, Poland)

  • Joanna Wachnicka

    (Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Gdańsk University of Technology, Narutowicza 11/12, 80-233 Gdańsk, Poland)

  • Sylwia Pazdan

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24, 31-155 Krakow, Poland)

Abstract

Road crossings across two or more lanes in one direction are particularly dangerous due to limited sight distance and high vehicle speeds. To improve their safety, road authorities should provide safety treatments. These may include additional measures to reduce speed and narrow the road cross-section and the introduction of active pedestrian crossings. Equipped with flashing lights activated automatically when a pedestrian is detected, the crossings are painted red and have an anti-skid surface on approaches. The article presents an analysis of road user behaviour at pedestrian crossings on dual carriageways with a varying provision of road safety measures in some Polish cities. It also evaluates the effectiveness of the measures over time. The study was conducted before, immediately after and one year after the additional signage was introduced. The evaluation is based on how vehicle speeds changed before the pedestrian crossing, how pedestrians behaved versus the vehicle and their readiness to cross the street. The number of conflicts on selected crossings was also evaluated. The safety treatments under analysis were found to be less effective than the traditional pedestrian safety measures such as speed cushions or roads narrowed to one lane. This suggests that if used on dual carriageways the measures should only be temporary and should ultimately be replaced with traffic lights or a grade separated solution (a footbridge or tunnel) on exits from urban areas. No clear-cut conclusions about pedestrian safety can be drawn based on the traffic conflicts in question. The article is divided into the following sections: introduction with a review of the literature on pedestrian and driver behaviour studies at pedestrian crossings, including midblock crossings and dual carriageways; a description of the research method and test sites, the results, discussion of the results and conclusion.

Suggested Citation

  • Piotr Szagala & Andrzej Brzezinski & Mariusz Kiec & Marcin Budzynski & Joanna Wachnicka & Sylwia Pazdan, 2022. "Pedestrian Safety at Midblock Crossings on Dual Carriageway Roads in Polish Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-13, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5703-:d:811299
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5703/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5703/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tang, Liying & Liu, Yugang & Li, JiaLi & Qi, Ruiting & Zheng, Shuai & Chen, Bin & Yang, Hongtai, 2020. "Pedestrian crossing design and analysis for symmetric intersections: Efficiency and safety," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 187-206.
    2. Maciej Kruszyna & Marta Matczuk-Pisarek, 2021. "The Effectiveness of Selected Devices to Reduce the Speed of Vehicles on Pedestrian Crossings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-21, August.
    3. Marcin Budzynski & Anna Gobis & Lucyna Guminska & Lukasz Jelinski & Mariusz Kiec & Piotr Tomczuk, 2021. "Assessment of the Influence of Road Infrastructure Parameters on the Behaviour of Drivers and Pedestrians in Pedestrian Crossing Areas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-21, June.
    4. Ruoxi Jiang & Shunying Zhu & Hongguang Chang & Jingan Wu & Naikan Ding & Bing Liu & Ji Qiu, 2021. "Determining an Improved Traffic Conflict Indicator for Highway Safety Estimation Based on Vehicle Trajectory Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-30, August.
    5. Yu, Chunhui & Ma, Wanjing & Lo, Hong K. & Yang, Xiaoguang, 2015. "Optimization of mid-block pedestrian crossing network with discrete demands," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 103-121.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maria Rella Riccardi & Francesco Galante & Antonella Scarano & Alfonso Montella, 2022. "Econometric and Machine Learning Methods to Identify Pedestrian Crash Patterns," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Dainora Juozevičiūtė & Vytautas Grigonis, 2022. "Evaluation of Exclusive Pedestrian Phase Safety Performance at One-Level Signalized Intersections in Vilnius," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-11, June.
    3. Monika Ziemska-Osuch & Dawid Osuch, 2022. "Modeling the Assessment of Intersections with Traffic Lights and the Significance Level of the Number of Pedestrians in Microsimulation Models Based on the PTV Vissim Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-11, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stanisław Majer & Alicja Sołowczuk, 2023. "Traffic Calming Measures and Their Slowing Effect on the Pedestrian Refuge Approach Sections," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-27, October.
    2. Yining Lu & Tao Wang & Zhuangzhuang Wang & Chaoyang Li & Yi Zhang, 2022. "Modeling the Dynamic Exclusive Pedestrian Phase Based on Transportation Equity and Cost Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-20, July.
    3. Piotr Jaskowski & Piotr Tomczuk & Marcin Chrzanowicz, 2022. "Construction of a Measurement System with GPS RTK for Operational Control of Street Lighting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-22, December.
    4. Mauro D’Apuzzo & Azzurra Evangelisti & Daniela Santilli & Sofia Nardoianni & Giuseppe Cappelli & Vittorio Nicolosi, 2023. "Towards a New Design Methodology for Vertical Traffic Calming Devices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-17, September.
    5. Tang, Liying & Liu, Yugang & Li, JiaLi & Qi, Ruiting & Zheng, Shuai & Chen, Bin & Yang, Hongtai, 2020. "Pedestrian crossing design and analysis for symmetric intersections: Efficiency and safety," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 187-206.
    6. Tomasz Krukowicz & Krzysztof Firląg & Józef Suda & Mirosław Czerliński, 2021. "Analysis of the Impact of Countdown Signal Timers on Driving Behavior and Road Safety," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-33, October.
    7. Guanghua Han & Xujin Pu & Bo Fan, 2017. "Sustainable Governance of Organic Food Production When Market Forecast Is Imprecise," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-20, June.
    8. Gang Cheng & Shuzhi Zhao & Tao Zhang, 2019. "A Bi-Level Programming Model for Optimal Bus Stop Spacing of a Bus Rapid Transit System," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-14, July.
    9. Marek Guzek & Rafał S. Jurecki & Wojciech Wach, 2022. "Vehicle and Traffic Safety," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-4, June.
    10. Maria Cieśla & Elżbieta Macioszek, 2022. "The Perspective Projects Promoting Sustainable Mobility by Active Travel to School on the Example of the Southern Poland Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-18, August.
    11. Sun, Qipeng & He, Chen & Wang, Yongjie & Liu, Hang & Ma, Fei & Wei, Xiao, 2022. "Reducing violation behaviors of pedestrians considering group interests of travelers at signalized crosswalk," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 594(C).
    12. Kłos, Marcin Jacek & Sierpiński, Grzegorz, 2023. "Siting of electric vehicle charging stations method addressing area potential and increasing their accessibility," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    13. Giuseppe Cantisani & Maria Vittoria Corazza & Paola Di Mascio & Laura Moretti, 2023. "Eight Traffic Calming “Easy Pieces” to Shape the Everyday Pedestrian Realm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-22, May.
    14. Tong Liu & Chang Wang & Rui Fu & Yong Ma & Zhuofan Liu & Tangzhi Liu, 2022. "Lane-Change Risk When the Subject Vehicle Is Faster Than the Following Vehicle: A Case Study on the Lane-Changing Warning Model Considering Different Driving Styles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-20, August.
    15. Yang, Xin & Chen, Anthony & Ning, Bin & Tang, Tao, 2016. "A stochastic model for the integrated optimization on metro timetable and speed profile with uncertain train mass," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 424-445.
    16. Maite Adames Torres & Hye Won Oh & Jeongwoo Lee, 2022. "The Built Environment and Children’s Active Commuting to School: A Case Study of San Pedro De Macoris, the Dominican Republic," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-19, September.
    17. Yang, Songpo & Liao, Feixiong & Wu, Jianjun & Timmermans, Harry J.P. & Sun, Huijun & Gao, Ziyou, 2020. "A bi-objective timetable optimization model incorporating energy allocation and passenger assignment in an energy-regenerative metro system," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 85-113.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5703-:d:811299. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.