IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i8p4570-d791686.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Frugal Eco-Innovation Policy? Ecological Poverty Alleviation in Contemporary China from a Perspective of Eco-Civilization Progress

Author

Listed:
  • Qingzhi Huan

    (School of Marxism, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)

  • Yiwen Chen

    (School of Marxism, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)

  • Xincong Huan

    (College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)

Abstract

Ecological poverty alleviation is a discursive and policy system with rich theoretical implications, comprehensive policy tools and multiple practical approaches, constituting an important dimension of contemporary Chinese poverty alleviation theory and practice, or a complete case of eco-innovation. Promoting green development, establishing ecological public-welfare compensation mechanisms and organizing ecological relocation are the three major modes or paths of implementing this policy. It is undoubtedly a historic success on the one hand and has still great potential for self-adjustment or self-transformation on the other from a perspective of eco-civilization progress or sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Qingzhi Huan & Yiwen Chen & Xincong Huan, 2022. "A Frugal Eco-Innovation Policy? Ecological Poverty Alleviation in Contemporary China from a Perspective of Eco-Civilization Progress," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-16, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:8:p:4570-:d:791686
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/8/4570/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/8/4570/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eugenia Rosca & Jack Reedy & Julia C. Bendul, 2018. "Does Frugal Innovation Enable Sustainable Development? A Systematic Literature Review," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 30(1), pages 136-157, January.
    2. Christian Le Bas, 2016. "Frugal innovation, sustainable innovation, reverse innovation: why do they look alike? Why are they different?," Journal of Innovation Economics, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(3), pages 9-26.
    3. Abdelmohsen A. Nassani & Crenguta Sinisi & Daniela Mihai & Loredana Paunescu & Zahid Yousaf & Mohamed Haffar, 2022. "Towards the Achievement of Frugal Innovation: Exploring Major Antecedents among SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-12, March.
    4. Lingming Chen & Congjia Huo, 2021. "Impact of Green Innovation Efficiency on Carbon Emission Reduction in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao GBA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-22, December.
    5. Rajagopal, 2021. "Sustainable Businesses in Developing Economies," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-030-51681-9, March.
    6. Tiwari, Rajnish & Herstatt, Cornelius, 2012. "Frugal Innovation: A Global Networks’ Perspective," Die Unternehmung - Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 66(3), pages 245-274.
    7. Isa Baud, 2016. "Moving Towards Inclusive Development? Recent Views on Inequalities, Frugal Innovations, Urban Geo-Technologies, Gender and Hybrid Governance," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 28(2), pages 119-129, April.
    8. Su-Mei Chen & Jia-Jia Ou & Ling-Yun He, 2021. "The Environmental and Health Impacts of Poverty Alleviation in China: From a Consumption-Based Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Meng Gao & Ke Ma & Renke He & Carlo Vezzoli & Nuo Li, 2023. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Sustainable Product Design Methods from 1999 to 2022: Trends, Progress, and Disparities between China and the Rest of the World," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-24, August.
    2. Jiajun He & Xin Fan & Lin Chen & Haoruo Chen & Jin Luo & Zirui Huang, 2023. "Influencing Factors of the Post-Relocation Support Policy’s Satisfaction Degree for Rural Household: A Case Study of County M, Sichuan Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-21, June.
    3. Xiyao Zhang & Xiaolei Wang & Jia Liu, 2023. "Spatial–Temporal Evolution and Influential Factors of Eco-Efficiency in Chinese Urban Agglomerations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-29, August.
    4. Maomao Zhang & Enqing Chen & Cheng Zhang & Chen Liu & Jianxing Li, 2024. "Multi-Scenario Simulation of Land Use Change and Ecosystem Service Value Based on the Markov–FLUS Model in Ezhou City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-23, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Josephat D. Sengura & Mu Renyan, 2024. "The Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation and Entrepreneurial Bricolage on Frugal Innovation and SMEs Sustainable Performance in Emerging Markets," International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 10(4), pages 19-37, May.
    2. Zahid Yousaf & Daniela Mihai & Umair Tanveer & Mădălina Brutu & Smaranda Toma & Sheikh Muhammad Zahid, 2022. "Organizational Innovativeness in the Circular Economy: The Interplay of Innovation Networks, Frugal Innovation, and Organizational Readiness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-13, May.
    3. Aleksy Kwilinski & Oleksii Lyulyov & Tetyana Pimonenko, 2023. "Inclusive Economic Growth: Relationship between Energy and Governance Efficiency," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-16, March.
    4. Tregidga, Helen & Laine, Matias, 2022. "On crisis and emergency: Is it time to rethink long-term environmental accounting?," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    5. Qaisar Iqbal & Noor Hazlina Ahmad & Zeyun Li & Yongmei Li, 2022. "To walk in beauty: Sustainable leadership, frugal innovation and environmental performance," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(3), pages 738-750, April.
    6. Danilo Boffa & Antonio Prencipe & Armando Papa & Christian Corsi & Mario Sorrentino, 2023. "Boosting circular economy via the b-corporation roads. The effect of the entrepreneurial culture and exogenous factors on sustainability performance," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 523-561, June.
    7. Bruno Francisco Diniz Marinho & Isotilia Costa Melo, 2022. "Fostering Innovative SMEs in a Developing Country: The ALI Program Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-16, October.
    8. Herstatt, Cornelius & Tiwari, Rajnish, 2020. "Opportunities of frugality in the post-Corona era," Working Papers 110, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute for Technology and Innovation Management.
    9. Traldi, Rebecca & Silva, Julie A. & Potapov, Peter & Tyukavina, Alexandra & Epprecht, Michael & Gore, Meredith L. & Phompila, Chittana, 2023. "Cultivating inequality? Regional rubber dynamics and implications for voluntary sustainability programs in Lao PDR," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    10. Michaela Kotkova Striteska & Viktor Prokop, 2020. "Dynamic Innovation Strategy Model in Practice of Innovation Leaders and Followers in CEE Countries—A Prerequisite for Building Innovative Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-20, May.
    11. Jing Liang & Lingying Pan, 2023. "Effect of Scale and Structure Changes of China’s High-Carbon Industries on Regional Carbon Emissions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-17, September.
    12. Suherman & Florentinus Pambudi Widiatmaka & Fitri Kensiwi & Didik Dwi Suharso & Sukirno & Pranyoto & Susena Karona Cahya & Kundori & Haniek Listyorini & Sapto Supriyanto & Pranoto & Sukrisno, 2024. "Resilience in tourism-based SMEs driven by initiatives and strategies through share value relational capital viewed from a resource-based theory perspective," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.
    13. Rossetto, Dennys Eduardo & Borini, Felipe Mendes & Bernardes, Roberto Carlos & Frankwick, Gary L., 2023. "Measuring frugal innovation capabilities: An initial scale proposition," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    14. Oke Hendra & Eko Prasojo & Reza Fathurrahman & Colin Pilbeam, 2024. "Vertical-horizontal Actor Collaboration in Governance Network: A Systematic Review," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 1233-1252, December.
    15. Zhang, Ling Eleanor & Zhao, Shasha & Kern, Philipp & Edwards, Tony & Zhang, Zhi-Xue, 2023. "The pursuit of indigenous innovation amid the Tech Cold War: The case of a Chinese high-tech firm," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(6).
    16. Ans Kolk & Miguel Rivera-Santos & Carlos Rufín, 2018. "Multinationals, international business, and poverty: A cross-disciplinary research overview and conceptual framework," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 1(1), pages 92-115, June.
    17. Octaviano Rojas Luiz & Enzo Barberio Mariano & Hermes Moretti Ribeiro da Silva, 2021. "Pro-Poor Innovations to Promote Instrumental Freedoms: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-22, December.
    18. Victor Mignenan, 2022. "Management of Frugal Innovation Projects: Research Approach and Perspectives," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(4), pages 121-121, April.
    19. Choi, Sanghak, 2024. "Climate change exposure and the use of short-term debt," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    20. Leopoldo Gutierrez & Ivan Montiel & Jordi A. Surroca & Josep A. Tribo, 2022. "Rainbow Wash or Rainbow Revolution? Dynamic Stakeholder Engagement for SDG-Driven Responsible Innovation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(4), pages 1113-1136, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:8:p:4570-:d:791686. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.