IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i8p4430-d789474.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On Risk Probability of Prefabricated Building Hoisting Construction Based on Multiple Correlations

Author

Listed:
  • Peng Wan

    (Engineering Management, School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Junwu Wang

    (Engineering Management, School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Ye Liu

    (Engineering Management, School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Qizhi Lu

    (Engineering Management, School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Chunbao Yuan

    (China Construction Seventh Engineering Division Corp. Ltd., Shenzhen 518000, China)

Abstract

With growing concern about environmental pollution and occupational safety in construction industry globally, prefabricated building has become a popular building model in sustainable society. In China, management specifications of prefabricated buildings are far from mature, and safety accidents occur frequently in construction. In order to comprehensively analyze risks in hoisting construction of prefabricated buildings, this study, in view of characteristics of hoisting construction process and correlations in complex system, summarizes risk factors and classifies them according to Wuli-Shili-Renli (WSR) system. From perspective of multiple correlations, evolution mechanism of multi-system correlation and multi-risk correlation is carried out, so as to explore risk probability of hoisting construction of prefabricated buildings. At the same time, this study extends Two Additive Choquet Integral (TACI) operator and Decision-making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) in dynamic stochastic environment to construct a two-stage model for risk probability research of hoisting construction, hoping to profoundly reveal influence of risk factors and their dynamic evolution. The results show that: (1) risk probability presented a seasonal, dynamic change trend, which meant rising first, then falling, and finally keeping rising, thus regular inspection and dynamic monitoring are required in hoisting construction in these regions in the first three quarters. (2) the influence of each risk factor demonstrated dynamic changes, and risk sources that need to prevent and defuse at different time points are varied, thus targeted measures catering to different risk sources are required. (3) the degree of risk controllability is in dynamic change, but classification of cause or result in the region at the period remains the same, thus necessitating targeted response measures aimed at various risk types. (4) Individual risks like hoisting job climated break out periodically, so the law of risk occurrence should be mastered and relative precautionary measures should be taken in advance.

Suggested Citation

  • Peng Wan & Junwu Wang & Ye Liu & Qizhi Lu & Chunbao Yuan, 2022. "On Risk Probability of Prefabricated Building Hoisting Construction Based on Multiple Correlations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-18, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:8:p:4430-:d:789474
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/8/4430/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/8/4430/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Terje Aven, 2018. "An Emerging New Risk Analysis Science: Foundations and Implications," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(5), pages 876-888, May.
    2. Jinjia Zhang & Kaili Xu & Greg You & Beibei Wang & Lei Zhao, 2019. "Causation Analysis of Risk Coupling of Gas Explosion Accident in Chinese Underground Coal Mines," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(7), pages 1634-1646, July.
    3. Zuo, Jian & Pullen, Stephen & Rameezdeen, Raufdeen & Bennetts, Helen & Wang, Yuan & Mao, Guozhu & Zhou, Zhihua & Du, Huibin & Duan, Huabo, 2017. "Green building evaluation from a life-cycle perspective in Australia: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 358-368.
    4. Hernandez-Fajardo, Isaac & Dueñas-Osorio, Leonardo, 2013. "Probabilistic study of cascading failures in complex interdependent lifeline systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 260-272.
    5. Yelda Ayrim & Kumru Didem Atalay & Gülin Feryal Can, 2018. "A New Stochastic MCDM Approach Based on COPRAS," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(03), pages 857-882, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Suo, Weilan & Wang, Lin & Li, Jianping, 2021. "Probabilistic risk assessment for interdependent critical infrastructures: A scenario-driven dynamic stochastic model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    2. Linyan Chen & Xin Gao & Shitao Gong & Zhou Li, 2020. "Regionalization of Green Building Development in China: A Comprehensive Evaluation Model Based on the Catastrophe Progression Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-22, July.
    3. Ota, Shuhei & Kimura, Mitsuhiro, 2017. "A statistical dependent failure detection method for n-component parallel systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 376-382.
    4. Monsalve, Mauricio & de la Llera, Juan Carlos, 2019. "Data-driven estimation of interdependencies and restoration of infrastructure systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 167-180.
    5. Heracleous, Constantinos & Kolios, Panayiotis & Panayiotou, Christos G. & Ellinas, Georgios & Polycarpou, Marios M., 2017. "Hybrid systems modeling for critical infrastructures interdependency analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 89-101.
    6. Azzolin, Alberto & Dueñas-Osorio, Leonardo & Cadini, Francesco & Zio, Enrico, 2018. "Electrical and topological drivers of the cascading failure dynamics in power transmission networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 196-206.
    7. Kim, Rakhyun & Tae, Sungho & Roh, Seungjun, 2017. "Development of low carbon durability design for green apartment buildings in South Korea," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 263-272.
    8. Wu, Baichao & Tang, Aiping & Wu, Jie, 2016. "Modeling cascading failures in interdependent infrastructures under terrorist attacks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 1-8.
    9. Ru Ji & Shilin Qu, 2019. "Investigation and Evaluation of Energy Consumption Performance for Hospital Buildings in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-14, March.
    10. Xue Xiao & Martin Skitmore & Heng Li & Bo Xia, 2019. "Mapping Knowledge in the Economic Areas of Green Building Using Scientometric Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-22, August.
    11. Wang, Zhaohua & Liu, Qiang & Zhang, Bin, 2022. "What kinds of building energy-saving retrofit projects should be preferred? Efficiency evaluation with three-stage data envelopment analysis (DEA)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    12. Mühlhofer, Evelyn & Koks, Elco E. & Kropf, Chahan M. & Sansavini, Giovanni & Bresch, David N., 2023. "A generalized natural hazard risk modelling framework for infrastructure failure cascades," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    13. Alejandro Lara & Felipe Bucci & Cristobal Palma & Juan Munizaga & Victor Montre-Águila, 2021. "Development, urban planning and political decisions. A triad that built territories at risk," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 109(2), pages 1935-1957, November.
    14. Wang, Jianwei & Jiang, Chen & Qian, Jianfei, 2014. "Robustness of interdependent networks with different link patterns against cascading failures," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 393(C), pages 535-541.
    15. Liu, Peng & Zhang, Yawen & He, Zhen, 2019. "The effect of population age on the acceptable safety of self-driving vehicles," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 341-347.
    16. Zarghami, Seyed Ashkan & Gunawan, Indra & Schultmann, Frank, 2018. "Integrating entropy theory and cospanning tree technique for redundancy analysis of water distribution networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 102-112.
    17. Lai, Xiaodong & Liu, Jixian & Shi, Qian & Georgiev, Georgi & Wu, Guangdong, 2017. "Driving forces for low carbon technology innovation in the building industry: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 299-315.
    18. Abrahamsen, Eirik Bjorheim & Selvik, Jon Tømmerås & Milazzo, Maria Francesca & Langdalen, Henrik & Dahl, Roy Endre & Bansal, Surbhi & Abrahamsen, Håkon Bjorheim, 2021. "On the use of the ‘Return Of Safety Investments’ (ROSI) measure for decision-making in the chemical processing industry," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    19. Shuang, Qing & Zhang, Mingyuan & Yuan, Yongbo, 2014. "Node vulnerability of water distribution networks under cascading failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 132-141.
    20. Ediz Atmaca & Esra Aktaş & Hafsa Nur Öztürk, 2023. "Evaluated Post-Disaster and Emergency Assembly Areas Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Techniques: A Case Study of Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-26, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:8:p:4430-:d:789474. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.