IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i4p2363-d753114.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transforming the German Food System: How to Make Start-Ups Great!

Author

Listed:
  • Kathrin Ludwig

    (DIL Deutsches Institut für Lebensmitteltechnik e.V.—German Institute of Food Technologies, Prof.-von-Klitzing-Straße 7, 49610 Quakenbrück, Germany
    DIL Innovation Hub, Prof.-von-Klitzing-Straße 7, 49610 Quakenbrück, Germany
    ESB Business School, Reutlingen University, Alteburgstraße 150, 72762 Reutlingen, Germany)

  • Adriano Profeta

    (DIL Deutsches Institut für Lebensmitteltechnik e.V.—German Institute of Food Technologies, Prof.-von-Klitzing-Straße 7, 49610 Quakenbrück, Germany)

  • Alexander Märdian

    (DIL Innovation Hub, Prof.-von-Klitzing-Straße 7, 49610 Quakenbrück, Germany)

  • Clemens Hollah

    (DIL Deutsches Institut für Lebensmitteltechnik e.V.—German Institute of Food Technologies, Prof.-von-Klitzing-Straße 7, 49610 Quakenbrück, Germany)

  • Maud Helene Schmiedeknecht

    (ESB Business School, Reutlingen University, Alteburgstraße 150, 72762 Reutlingen, Germany)

  • Volker Heinz

    (DIL Deutsches Institut für Lebensmitteltechnik e.V.—German Institute of Food Technologies, Prof.-von-Klitzing-Straße 7, 49610 Quakenbrück, Germany)

Abstract

The food system represents a key industry for Europe and Germany in particular. However, it is also the single most significant contributor to climate and environmental change. A food system transformation is necessary to overcome the system’s major and constantly increasing challenges in the upcoming decades. One possible facilitator for this transformation are radical and disruptive innovations that start-ups develop. There are many challenges for start-ups in general and food start-ups in particular. Various support opportunities and resources are crucial to ensure the success of food start-ups. One aim of this study is to identify how the success of start-ups in the food system can be supported and further strengthened by actors in the innovation ecosystem in Germany. There is still room for improvement and collaboration toward a thriving innovation ecosystem. A successful innovation ecosystem is characterised by a well-organised, collaborative, and supportive environment with a vivid exchange between the members in the ecosystem. The interviewees confirmed this, and although the different actors are already cooperating, there is still room for improvement. The most common recommendation for improving cooperation is learning from other countries and bringing the best to Germany.

Suggested Citation

  • Kathrin Ludwig & Adriano Profeta & Alexander Märdian & Clemens Hollah & Maud Helene Schmiedeknecht & Volker Heinz, 2022. "Transforming the German Food System: How to Make Start-Ups Great!," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-35, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2363-:d:753114
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2363/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2363/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Profeta, Adriano & Balling, Richard & Enneking, Ulrich, 2006. "Geschützte Herkunftsangaben: Status Quo und Entwicklung der Nutzung der Verordnung (EG) 510/06," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 55(08), pages 1-6.
    2. Gartner, William B. & Birley, Sue, 2002. "Introduction to the special issue on qualitative methods in entrepreneurship research," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 387-395, September.
    3. Javier Jorge-Vázquez & Mª Peana Chivite-Cebolla & Francisco Salinas-Ramos, 2021. "The Digitalization of the European Agri-Food Cooperative Sector. Determining Factors to Embrace Information and Communication Technologies," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lin Zhu & Brychko Alina, 2023. "Bibliometric Analysis of Research Hotspots and Trends in the Transformation and Development of Agricultural Enterprises," Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, Sciendo, vol. 45(4), pages 438-452, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mark D. Packard & Per L. Bylund, 2025. "Truth, knowledge, and entrepreneurship theory: arguments for a rationalist scientific epistemology," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 65(1), pages 381-405, June.
    2. McKeever, Edward & Jack, Sarah & Anderson, Alistair, 2015. "Embedded entrepreneurship in the creative re-construction of place," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 50-65.
    3. Gartner, William B., 2007. "Entrepreneurial narrative and a science of the imagination," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 613-627, September.
    4. Stefania Troiano & Matteo Carzedda & Francesco Marangon, 2023. "Better richer than environmentally friendly? Describing preferences toward and factors affecting precision agriculture adoption in Italy," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    5. Uma Shankar Yadav & Ravindra Tripathi & Mano Ashish Tripathi & Indrajit Ghosal & Ashish Kumar & Mitu Mandal & Akanksha Singh, 2023. "Digital and innovative entrepreneurship in the Indian handicraft sector after the COVID-19 pandemic: challenges and opportunities," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-40, December.
    6. Bhairab Talukdar, 2024. "Factors and challenges influencing female migrant entrepreneurship: An empirical study in India," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 14(1), pages 1-23, December.
    7. Suddaby, Roy & Bruton, Garry D. & Si, Steven X., 2015. "Entrepreneurship through a qualitative lens: Insights on the construction and/or discovery of entrepreneurial opportunity," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 1-10.
    8. David Deakins & Jo Bensemann, 2019. "Achieving Innovation In A Lean Environment: How Innovative Small Firms Overcome Resource Constraints," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(04), pages 1-36, May.
    9. Mengshuai Zhu & Chen Shen & Yajun Tian & Jianzhai Wu & Yueying Mu, 2022. "Factors Affecting Smallholder Farmers’ Marketing Channel Choice in China with Multivariate Logit Model," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-11, September.
    10. Golshan Javadian & Crystal Dobratz & Alka Gupta & Vishal K. Gupta & Jeffrey A. Martin, 2020. "Qualitative Research in Entrepreneurship Studies: A State-of-Science," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 29(2), pages 223-258, September.
    11. Le Breton-Miller, Isabelle & Miller, Danny, 2023. "Contradiction and disaggregation for family firm research," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 14(1).
    12. Veronica Scuotto & Manlio Del Giudice & Alexeis Garcia-Perez & Beatrice Orlando & Francesco Ciampi, 2020. "A spill over effect of entrepreneurial orientation on technological innovativeness: an outlook of universities and research based spin offs," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(6), pages 1634-1654, December.
    13. Gilbert E. Mushi & Giovanna Di Marzo Serugendo & Pierre-Yves Burgi, 2022. "Digital Technology and Services for Sustainable Agriculture in Tanzania: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    14. Xiaohan Li & Yuwei Zhang & Ali Sorourkhah & S. A. Edalatpanah, 2024. "Introducing Antifragility Analysis Algorithm for Assessing Digitalization Strategies of the Agricultural Economy in the Small Farming Section," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 12191-12215, September.
    15. Joana Colussi & Eric L. Morgan & Gary D. Schnitkey & Antônio D. Padula, 2022. "How Communication Affects the Adoption of Digital Technologies in Soybean Production: A Survey in Brazil," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-24, April.
    16. Martin Hannibal, 2017. "Enacted identities in the university spin-off process—bridging an imaginative gap [L’adoption des identités de rôle dans les processus de spin-off universitaires—combler un écart imaginaire]," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 239-265, September.
    17. Camelia-Daniela Hategan & Ruxandra-Ioana Pitorac & Vasile-Petru Hategan & Carmen Mihaela Imbrescu, 2021. "Opportunities and Challenges of Companies from the Romanian E-Commerce Market for Sustainable Competitiveness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-15, December.
    18. Maribel Guerrero & David Urbano & James Cunningham & Damien Organ, 2014. "Entrepreneurial universities in two European regions: a case study comparison," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 39(3), pages 415-434, June.
    19. Stylianos Ioannidis & Christos Karelakis & Zacharias Papanikolaou & George Theodossiou, 2022. "Exploring Digitalisation Adaptation of Agro-food Firms: Evidence from Greece," International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research (IJBESAR), Democritus University of Thrace (DUTH), Kavala Campus, Greece, vol. 15(1), pages 94-104, July.
    20. Friederike Welter & Frank Lasch, 2008. "Entrepreneurship Research in Europe: Taking Stock and Looking Forward," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 32(2), pages 241-248, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2363-:d:753114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.