IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i4p2363-d753114.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transforming the German Food System: How to Make Start-Ups Great!

Author

Listed:
  • Kathrin Ludwig

    (DIL Deutsches Institut für Lebensmitteltechnik e.V.—German Institute of Food Technologies, Prof.-von-Klitzing-Straße 7, 49610 Quakenbrück, Germany
    DIL Innovation Hub, Prof.-von-Klitzing-Straße 7, 49610 Quakenbrück, Germany
    ESB Business School, Reutlingen University, Alteburgstraße 150, 72762 Reutlingen, Germany)

  • Adriano Profeta

    (DIL Deutsches Institut für Lebensmitteltechnik e.V.—German Institute of Food Technologies, Prof.-von-Klitzing-Straße 7, 49610 Quakenbrück, Germany)

  • Alexander Märdian

    (DIL Innovation Hub, Prof.-von-Klitzing-Straße 7, 49610 Quakenbrück, Germany)

  • Clemens Hollah

    (DIL Deutsches Institut für Lebensmitteltechnik e.V.—German Institute of Food Technologies, Prof.-von-Klitzing-Straße 7, 49610 Quakenbrück, Germany)

  • Maud Helene Schmiedeknecht

    (ESB Business School, Reutlingen University, Alteburgstraße 150, 72762 Reutlingen, Germany)

  • Volker Heinz

    (DIL Deutsches Institut für Lebensmitteltechnik e.V.—German Institute of Food Technologies, Prof.-von-Klitzing-Straße 7, 49610 Quakenbrück, Germany)

Abstract

The food system represents a key industry for Europe and Germany in particular. However, it is also the single most significant contributor to climate and environmental change. A food system transformation is necessary to overcome the system’s major and constantly increasing challenges in the upcoming decades. One possible facilitator for this transformation are radical and disruptive innovations that start-ups develop. There are many challenges for start-ups in general and food start-ups in particular. Various support opportunities and resources are crucial to ensure the success of food start-ups. One aim of this study is to identify how the success of start-ups in the food system can be supported and further strengthened by actors in the innovation ecosystem in Germany. There is still room for improvement and collaboration toward a thriving innovation ecosystem. A successful innovation ecosystem is characterised by a well-organised, collaborative, and supportive environment with a vivid exchange between the members in the ecosystem. The interviewees confirmed this, and although the different actors are already cooperating, there is still room for improvement. The most common recommendation for improving cooperation is learning from other countries and bringing the best to Germany.

Suggested Citation

  • Kathrin Ludwig & Adriano Profeta & Alexander Märdian & Clemens Hollah & Maud Helene Schmiedeknecht & Volker Heinz, 2022. "Transforming the German Food System: How to Make Start-Ups Great!," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-35, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2363-:d:753114
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2363/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2363/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Profeta, Adriano & Balling, Richard & Enneking, Ulrich, 2006. "Geschützte Herkunftsangaben: Status Quo und Entwicklung der Nutzung der Verordnung (EG) 510/06," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 55(08), pages 1-6.
    2. Gartner, William B. & Birley, Sue, 2002. "Introduction to the special issue on qualitative methods in entrepreneurship research," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 387-395, September.
    3. Javier Jorge-Vázquez & Mª Peana Chivite-Cebolla & Francisco Salinas-Ramos, 2021. "The Digitalization of the European Agri-Food Cooperative Sector. Determining Factors to Embrace Information and Communication Technologies," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lin Zhu & Brychko Alina, 2023. "Bibliometric Analysis of Research Hotspots and Trends in the Transformation and Development of Agricultural Enterprises," Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, Sciendo, vol. 45(4), pages 438-452, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tan, Justin & Yang, Jun & Veliyath, Rajaram, 2009. "Particularistic and system trust among small and medium enterprises: A comparative study in China's transition economy," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 544-557, November.
    2. Leufkens, Daniel & Schröck, Rebecca, 2013. "Regulierungspolitische Effekte geschützter geografischer Herkunftsangaben der EU in einer dynamischen und qualitätspolitischen Perspektive," 53rd Annual Conference, Berlin, Germany, September 25-27, 2013 156119, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    3. Maria García-García & María Victoria Carrillo-Durán & Jose Maia, 2021. "The Maturity of Corporate Websites as a Digital Communication Channel in Portuguese SMEs’ Process of Adopting E-Commerce," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-18, October.
    4. Simon C. Parker & William B. Gartner, 2004. "Introduction," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 28(5), pages 413-418, September.
    5. McKeever, Edward & Jack, Sarah & Anderson, Alistair, 2015. "Embedded entrepreneurship in the creative re-construction of place," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 50-65.
    6. Gartner, William B., 2007. "Entrepreneurial narrative and a science of the imagination," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 613-627, September.
    7. Stefania Troiano & Matteo Carzedda & Francesco Marangon, 2023. "Better richer than environmentally friendly? Describing preferences toward and factors affecting precision agriculture adoption in Italy," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    8. Luo, Xueming & Zhou, Lianxi & Liu, Sandra S., 2005. "Entrepreneurial firms in the context of China's transition economy: an integrative framework and empirical examination," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(3), pages 277-284, March.
    9. Ravasi, Davide & Turati, Carlo, 2005. "Exploring entrepreneurial learning: a comparative study of technology development projects," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 137-164, January.
    10. Ethné Swartz & Frances M. Amatucci & Susan Coleman, 2016. "Still A Man'S World? Second Generation Gender Bias In External Equity Term Sheet Negotiations," Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship (JDE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(03), pages 1-20, September.
    11. Smith, Claudia G. & Smith, J. Brock, 2021. "Founders' uses of digital networks for resource acquisition: Extending network theory online," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 466-482.
    12. Christian Lechner & Abeer Pervaiz, 2020. "From invention to industry from a social movement perspective: the emergence of the 3D printing industry," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-28, December.
    13. Kevin Hindle, 2004. "Choosing Qualitative Methods for Entrepreneurial Cognition Research: A Canonical Development Approach," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 28(6), pages 575-607, November.
    14. Profeta, Adriano & Balling, Richard, 2007. "Evaluierung der Übergangsregelung des Herkunftsschutzes bei Agrarprodukten und Lebensmitteln in Europa gemäß Verordnung (EG) Nr. 510/06 und Verbesserungsvorschläge für die anstehende Modifikation," Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, vol. 56(4).
    15. Sven M. Laudien & Robin Pesch, 2019. "Understanding the influence of digitalization on service firm business model design: a qualitative-empirical analysis," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 575-587, June.
    16. Schuster, Charlotte Leonie, 2013. "Entrepreneurship - Methodische Herausforderungen einer jungen Forschungsdisziplin [Entrepreneurship - Methodological challenges of a young research discipline]," MPRA Paper 45472, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Forbes, Daniel P. & Kirsch, David A., 2011. "The study of emerging industries: Recognizing and responding to some central problems," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 26(5), pages 589-602, September.
    18. Suddaby, Roy & Bruton, Garry D. & Si, Steven X., 2015. "Entrepreneurship through a qualitative lens: Insights on the construction and/or discovery of entrepreneurial opportunity," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 1-10.
    19. Sergio Luis Náñez Alonso & Javier Jorge-Vazquez & Miguel Ángel Echarte Fernández & Konrad Kolegowicz & Wojciech Szymla, 2022. "Financial Exclusion in Rural and Urban Contexts in Poland: A Threat to Achieving SDG Eight?," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-21, April.
    20. David Deakins & Jo Bensemann, 2019. "Achieving Innovation In A Lean Environment: How Innovative Small Firms Overcome Resource Constraints," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(04), pages 1-36, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2363-:d:753114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.