IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i3p1808-d742550.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Soil Sustainability and Resilience Concepts to Support Future Land Management Practice: A Case Study of Mt Grand Station, Hāwea, New Zealand

Author

Listed:
  • Carol Smith

    (Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Lincoln University, Lincoln 7647, Canterbury, New Zealand)

  • Sadeepa Jayathunga

    (Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Lincoln University, Lincoln 7647, Canterbury, New Zealand
    Scion, Rotorua 3010, North Island, New Zealand)

  • Pablo Gregorini

    (Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Lincoln University, Lincoln 7647, Canterbury, New Zealand)

  • Fabiellen C. Pereira

    (Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Lincoln University, Lincoln 7647, Canterbury, New Zealand)

  • Wendy McWilliam

    (Faculty of Environment, Society and Design, Lincoln University, Lincoln 7647, Canterbury, New Zealand)

Abstract

Soil acts as the integrator of processes operating within the biological and hydrological landscapes and responds to external disturbances and processes on varying time scales. The impact of any change results in a corresponding response in the system; which is dependent on the resistance of the soil system to the disturbance. Irreversible permanent change results when the soil system shifts over a threshold tipping point; with the soil system experiencing a regime shift with associated structural and functional collapse. Climate change is the most important external disturbance or stressor on these systems due to changes in precipitation, temperature and moisture regimes. Our research at Mt Grand is focused on approaches to increasing land use resiliency in the face of environmental change. Our purpose is to select and apply soil quality indices which can be used to assess soil resilience to external disturbance events for Mt Grand Station in New Zealand. We will identify biophysical variations and landscape drivers in soil resilience; and use these results to match land management practices with variations in soil resilience. For example, soils with low resilience will only have land management practices that have a low impact on the soil resource. We selected soil attributes that represented indicators of resistance, used to quantify the capacity of a soil to recover its functionality. We mapped this soil resilience framework against a national database of soil and landscape attributes for Mt Grand Station. The output from this research is to posit a conceptual framework of soil quality indices which relates to soil resilience, and thus to create a spatial map of soil resilience for Mt Grand Station.

Suggested Citation

  • Carol Smith & Sadeepa Jayathunga & Pablo Gregorini & Fabiellen C. Pereira & Wendy McWilliam, 2022. "Using Soil Sustainability and Resilience Concepts to Support Future Land Management Practice: A Case Study of Mt Grand Station, Hāwea, New Zealand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-19, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1808-:d:742550
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1808/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1808/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Coyle, Cait & Creamer, Rachel E. & Schulte, Rogier P.O. & O'Sullivan, Lilian & Jordan, Phil, 2016. "A Functional Land Management conceptual framework under soil drainage and land use scenarios," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 39-48.
    2. R. Michael Lehman & Cynthia A. Cambardella & Diane E. Stott & Veronica Acosta-Martinez & Daniel K. Manter & Jeffrey S. Buyer & Jude E. Maul & Jeffrey L. Smith & Harold P. Collins & Jonathan J. Halvors, 2015. "Understanding and Enhancing Soil Biological Health: The Solution for Reversing Soil Degradation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-40, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fabiellen C. Pereira & Stuart Charters & Carol M. S. Smith & Thomas M. R. Maxwell & Pablo Gregorini, 2023. "A Geospatial Modelling Approach to Assess the Capability of High-Country Stations in Delivering Ecosystem Services," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-18, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rui Zhao & Junying Li & Kening Wu & Long Kang, 2021. "Cultivated Land Use Zoning Based on Soil Function Evaluation from the Perspective of Black Soil Protection," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-29, June.
    2. Dean C. Stronge & Bryan A. Stevenson & Garth R. Harmsworth & Robyn L. Kannemeyer, 2020. "A Well-Being Approach to Soil Health—Insights from Aotearoa New Zealand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-12, September.
    3. Jean L. Steiner & David D. Briske & David P. Brown & Caitlin M. Rottler, 2018. "Vulnerability of Southern Plains agriculture to climate change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 146(1), pages 201-218, January.
    4. Babacar Thioye & Marc Legras & Lisa Castel & François Hirissou & Naouel Chaftar & Isabelle Trinsoutrot-Gattin, 2021. "Understanding Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Colonization in Walnut Plantations: The Contribution of Cover Crops and Soil Microbial Communities," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    5. Clagnan, E. & Thornton, S.F. & Rolfe, S.A. & Wells, N.S. & Knoeller, K. & Fenton, O., 2018. "Investigating “net” provenance, N source, transformation and fate within hydrologically isolated grassland plots," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 1-8.
    6. Rui Zhao & Kening Wu, 2021. "Soil Health Evaluation of Farmland Based on Functional Soil Management—A Case Study of Yixing City, Jiangsu Province, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-27, June.
    7. Majid, Maliqa & Khan, Junaid N. & Ahmad Shah, Qazi Muneeb & Masoodi, Khalid Z. & Afroza, Baseerat & Parvaze, Saqib, 2021. "Evaluation of hydroponic systems for the cultivation of Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L., var. Longifolia) and comparison with protected soil-based cultivation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    8. Yingying Xing & Xiaoli Niu & Ning Wang & Wenting Jiang & Yaguang Gao & Xiukang Wang, 2020. "The Correlation between Soil Nutrient and Potato Quality in Loess Plateau of China Based on PLSR," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, February.
    9. repec:mth:jas888:v:6:y:2018:i:3:p:1-33 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Lisa Lobry de Bruyn & Susan Andrews, 2016. "Are Australian and United States Farmers Using Soil Information for Soil Health Management?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-33, March.
    11. Vanesa Zorrilla-Muñoz & Marc Petz & María Silveria Agulló-Tomás, 2021. "GARCH model to estimate the impact of agricultural greenhouse gas emissions per sociodemographic factors and CAP in Spain," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 4675-4697, March.
    12. Tianyi Cai & Xinhuan Zhang & Fuqiang Xia & Danni Lu, 2022. "Function Evolution of Oasis Cultivated Land and Its Trade-Off and Synergy Relationship in Xinjiang, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, August.
    13. Douglas L. Karlen & Charles W. Rice, 2015. "Soil Degradation: Will Humankind Ever Learn?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-12, September.
    14. Sijing Ye & Changqing Song & Yakov Kuzyakov & Feng Cheng & Xiangbin Kong & Zhe Feng & Peichao Gao, 2022. "Preface: Arable Land Quality: Observation, Estimation, Optimization, and Application," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-5, June.
    15. Yongzhong Tan & Hang Chen & Kuan Lian & Zhenning Yu, 2020. "Comprehensive Evaluation of Cultivated Land Quality at County Scale: A Case Study of Shengzhou, Zhejiang Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-15, February.
    16. Anghinoni, Guilherme & Anghinoni, Fernanda Brunetta Godinho & Tormena, Cássio Antonio & Braccini, Alessandro Lucca & de Carvalho Mendes, Ieda & Zancanaro, Leandro & Lal, Rattan, 2021. "Conservation agriculture strengthen sustainability of Brazilian grain production and food security," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    17. Dirk Vrebos & Francesca Bampa & Rachel E. Creamer & Ciro Gardi & Bhim Bahadur Ghaley & Arwyn Jones & Michiel Rutgers & Taru Sandén & Jan Staes & Patrick Meire, 2017. "The Impact of Policy Instruments on Soil Multifunctionality in the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-18, March.
    18. Chiara Piccini & Roberta Farina & Claudia Di Bene & Silvia Vanino & Rosario Napoli, 2023. "Modeling Soil Health Indicators to Assess the Effectiveness of Sustainable Soil Management on Mediterranean Arable Land," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-17, October.
    19. Caroline Brock & Douglas Jackson-Smith & Steven Culman & Douglas Doohan & Catherine Herms, 2021. "Soil balancing within organic farming: negotiating meanings and boundaries in an alternative agricultural community of practice," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 38(2), pages 449-465, June.
    20. Jarosław Grządziel & Karolina Furtak & Anna Gałązka, 2018. "Community-Level Physiological Profiles of Microorganisms from Different Types of Soil That Are Characteristic to Poland—A Long-Term Microplot Experiment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.
    21. Ye, Sijing & Song, Changqing & Shen, Shi & Gao, Peichao & Cheng, Changxiu & Cheng, Feng & Wan, Changjun & Zhu, Dehai, 2020. "Spatial pattern of arable land-use intensity in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1808-:d:742550. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.