IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i3p1670-d739622.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Satellite Data Correlate with In Situ Rainfall and Smallholder Crop Yields? Implications for Crop Insurance

Author

Listed:
  • Wonga Masiza

    (Department of Geography and Environmental Science, University of Fort Hare, Private Bag X1314, Alice 5700, South Africa
    Agricultural Research Council-Institute for Soil, Climate and Water, Private Bag X79, Pretoria 0001, South Africa)

  • Johannes George Chirima

    (Agricultural Research Council-Institute for Soil, Climate and Water, Private Bag X79, Pretoria 0001, South Africa
    Centre for Geoinformation Science, Department of Geography, Geoinformatics and Meteorology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0001, South Africa)

  • Hamisai Hamandawana

    (Afromontane Research Unit, Risk and Vulnerability Science Centre, University of the Free State, Private Bag X13, Phuthaditjhaba 9866, South Africa)

  • Ahmed Mukalazi Kalumba

    (Department of Geography and Environmental Science, University of Fort Hare, Private Bag X1314, Alice 5700, South Africa)

  • Hezekiel Bheki Magagula

    (Department of Geography and Environmental Science, University of Fort Hare, Private Bag X1314, Alice 5700, South Africa)

Abstract

Adverse weather is one of the most prevalent sources of risk in agriculture. Its impacts are aggravated by the lack of effective risk management mechanisms. That is why resource-poor farmers tend to respond to weather risks by adopting low-capital investment, low-return, and low-risk agricultural practices. This challenge needs to be addressed with innovative risk management strategies. One of the tools that is gaining traction, especially in the developing countries, is weather-index-based insurance (WII). However, WII uptake is still low because of several constraints, one of which is basis risk. This study attempts to address this problem by evaluating the suitability of TAMSAT, CHIRPS, MODIS, and Sentinel-2 data for WII. We evaluated the first three datasets against in situ rainfall measurements at different spatial and temporal scales over the maize-growing season in a smallholder farming area in South Africa. CHIRPS had higher correlations with in situ measured rainfall data than TAMSAT and MODIS NDVI. CHIRPS performed equally well at 10 km and 25 km spatial scales, and better at monthly than daily and 16-day time steps (maximum R = 0.78, mean R = 0.72). Due to the lack of reliable historical yield data, we conducted yield surveys over three consecutive seasons using an objective crop cut method. We then assessed how well rainfall and NDVI related with maize yield. There was a poor relationship between these variables and maize yield (R 2 ≤ 0.14). The study concludes by pointing out that crop yield does not always have a linear relationship with weather and vegetation indices, and that water is not always the main yield-limiting factor in smallholder farming systems. To minimize basis risk, the process of designing WII must include identification of main yield-limiting factors for specific localities. Alternatively, insurers could use crop water requirement methods to design WII.

Suggested Citation

  • Wonga Masiza & Johannes George Chirima & Hamisai Hamandawana & Ahmed Mukalazi Kalumba & Hezekiel Bheki Magagula, 2022. "Do Satellite Data Correlate with In Situ Rainfall and Smallholder Crop Yields? Implications for Crop Insurance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-13, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1670-:d:739622
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1670/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1670/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Komarek, Adam M. & De Pinto, Alessandro & Smith, Vincent H., 2020. "A review of types of risks in agriculture: What we know and what we need to know," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    2. Denis Gautier & David Denis & Bruno Locatelli, 2016. "Impacts of drought and responses of rural populations in West Africa: a systematic review," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(5), pages 666-681, September.
    3. Hansen, James & Hellin, Jon & Rosenstock, Todd & Fisher, Eleanor & Cairns, Jill & Stirling, Clare & Lamanna, Christine & van Etten, Jacob & Rose, Alison & Campbell, Bruce, 2019. "Climate risk management and rural poverty reduction," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 28-46.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huet, E.K. & Adam, M. & Giller, K.E. & Descheemaeker, K., 2020. "Diversity in perception and management of farming risks in southern Mali," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    2. Blazquez-Soriano, Amparo & Ramos-Sandoval, Rosmery, 2022. "Information transfer as a tool to improve the resilience of farmers against the effects of climate change: The case of the Peruvian National Agrarian Innovation System," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    3. Islam, Md. Mofakkarul & Sarker, Md. Asaduzzaman & Al Mamun, Md. Abdullah & Mamun-ur-Rashid, Md. & Roy, Debashis, 2021. "Stepping Up versus Stepping Out: On the outcomes and drivers of two alternative climate change adaptation strategies of smallholders," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    4. Chandra S. R. Nuthalapati & Chaitanya Nuthalapati, 2021. "Has Open Innovation Taken Root in India? Evidence from Startups Working in Food Value Chains," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.
    5. Daniele, Bertolozzi-Caredio & Barbara, Soriano & Isabel, Bardaji & Alberto, Garrido, 2022. "Analysis of perceived robustness, adaptability and transformability of Spanish extensive livestock farms under alternative challenging scenarios," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    6. Dayakar Peddi & B. Suresh Reddy, 2023. "Analysis of Irrigation Enhancement, Crop Diversification and Farm Profits: Evidence from Telangana State," Review of Development and Change, , vol. 28(2), pages 189-206, December.
    7. Lotte Yanore & Jaap Sok & Alfons Oude Lansink, 2024. "Do Dutch farmers invest in expansion despite increased policy uncertainty? A participatory Bayesian network approach," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(1), pages 93-115, January.
    8. Shahzad, Muhammad Faisal & Abdulai, Awudu, 2020. "Adaptation to extreme weather conditions and farm performance in rural Pakistan," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    9. Martey, Edward & Etwire, Prince Maxwell & Abdoulaye, Tahirou, 2020. "Welfare impacts of climate-smart agriculture in Ghana: Does row planting and drought-tolerant maize varieties matter?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    10. Wondimagegn Tesfaye & Garrick Blalock & Nyasha Tirivayi, 2021. "Climate‐Smart Innovations and Rural Poverty in Ethiopia: Exploring Impacts and Pathways," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 103(3), pages 878-899, May.
    11. Aristide Maniriho & Edouard Musabanganji & Philippe Lebailly, 2022. "A Comparative Study between Major Crop (Potato) and Minor Crop (Onion) in Volcanic Highlands of Rwanda," Journal of Agriculture and Crops, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 8(2), pages 68-74, 04-2022.
    12. Diego Suárez & José M. Díaz-Puente & Maddalena Bettoni, 2021. "Risks Identification and Management Related to Rural Innovation Projects through Social Networks Analysis: A Case Study in Spain," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-23, June.
    13. Komarek, Adam M. & De Pinto, Alessandro & Smith, Vincent H., 2020. "A review of types of risks in agriculture: What we know and what we need to know," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    14. Batanai Sammie & Elvis Mupfiga & Liboster Mwadzingeni & Tavengwa Chitata & Raymond Mugandani, 2021. "A gendered lens to self-evaluated and actual climate change knowledge," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 11(1), pages 65-75, March.
    15. Thomas Slijper & Yann de Mey & P Marijn Poortvliet & Miranda P M Meuwissen, 2022. "Quantifying the resilience of European farms using FADN," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 49(1), pages 121-150.
    16. Yufeng Ren & Zhemin Li & Yuting Wang & Tianyu Zhang, 2020. "Development and Prospect of Food Security Cooperation in the BRICS Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, March.
    17. Spiegel, Alisa & Slijper, Thomas & de Mey, Yann & Meuwissen, Miranda P.M. & Poortvliet, P. Marijn & Rommel, Jens & Hansson, Helena & Vigani, Mauro & Soriano, Bárbara & Wauters, Erwin & Appel, Franzisk, 2021. "Resilience capacities as perceived by European farmers," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    18. Malni Kumarathunga & Rodrigo N. Calheiros & Athula Ginige, 2022. "Smart Agricultural Futures Market: Blockchain Technology as a Trust Enabler between Smallholder Farmers and Buyers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-20, March.
    19. Lotte Yanore & Jaap Sok & Alfons Oude Lansink, 2023. "Anticipate, wait or don't invest? The strategic net present value approach to study expansion decisions under policy uncertainty," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(2), pages 535-548, March.
    20. Krzysztof Pakuła & Krystyna Pieniak-Lendzion & Marcin Becher & Beata Kuziemska, 2021. "Selection of the supplier of production means as a risk element in farm logistics," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(4), pages 585-594, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1670-:d:739622. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.