IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i2p1030-d726751.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Eager to Develop Sustainable Business Ideas? Assessment through a New Business Plan (BP4S Model)

Author

Listed:
  • Paulo Lopes Henriques

    (Advance/CSG, ISEG School of Economics and Management, Universidade de Lisboa, 1200-781 Lisbon, Portugal)

  • Pedro Verga Matos

    (Advance/CSG, ISEG School of Economics and Management, Universidade de Lisboa, 1200-781 Lisbon, Portugal)

  • Helena Mateus Jerónimo

    (Advance/CSG, ISEG School of Economics and Management, Universidade de Lisboa, 1200-781 Lisbon, Portugal)

Abstract

This article presents the BP4S (Business Plan for Sustainability), which builds on the literature about business models, as an innovation that considers sustainability as a characteristic of a business. Sustainability becomes the objective of business instead of being an attribute of business. This article also proposes the Global Sustainability Project Index (GSPI) as a metric to measure the effect of a business venture on sustainability to help with the decision-making on the viability of a project in supporting the pillars of sustainability. Additionally, a collection of indicators for the 3Ps of sustainability (planet, people, and profit) is also an asset of this article.

Suggested Citation

  • Paulo Lopes Henriques & Pedro Verga Matos & Helena Mateus Jerónimo, 2022. "Eager to Develop Sustainable Business Ideas? Assessment through a New Business Plan (BP4S Model)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-15, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:1030-:d:726751
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/2/1030/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/2/1030/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Donald F. Kuratko & David B. Audretsch, 2009. "Strategic Entrepreneurship: Exploring Different Perspectives of an Emerging Concept," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 33(1), pages 1-17, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Meng-Jun Hsu & Ming-Chia Hsieh & Emmanuel Kwame Opoku, 2022. "Knowledge Co-Creation during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Dual-Regulated Learning Model in Virtual Hospitality Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Régis Y. Chenavaz & Alexandra Couston & Stéphanie Heichelbech & Isabelle Pignatel & Stanko Dimitrov, 2023. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Entrepreneurial Ventures: A Conceptual Framework and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-30, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marco Cucculelli, 2018. "Firm age and the probability of product innovation. Do CEO tenure and product tenure matter?," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 153-179, January.
    2. Radostina Emilova Yuleva, 2019. "Competitive Advantages And Competitive Strategies Of Small And Medium-Sized Enterprises," Economics and Management, Faculty of Economics, SOUTH-WEST UNIVERSITY "NEOFIT RILSKI", BLAGOEVGRAD, vol. 16(1), pages 71-81.
    3. Silveli Cristo-Andrade & João J. Ferreira, 2020. "Knowledge spillovers and strategic entrepreneurship: what researches and approaches?," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 263-286, March.
    4. repec:thr:techub:10025:y:2021:i:1:p:544-551 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Louise Lindbjerg & Theodor Vladasel, 2021. "Hiring Entrepreneurs for Innovation," Working Papers 1309, Barcelona School of Economics.
    6. Boone, Christophe & Wezel, Filippo Carlo & van Witteloostuijn, Arjen, 2013. "Joining the pack or going solo? A dynamic theory of new firm positioning," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 511-527.
    7. Yan Ling & María Concepción López-Fernández & Ana María Serrano-Bedia & Franz W. Kellermanns, 2020. "Organizational culture and entrepreneurial orientation: examination through a new conceptualization lens," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 709-737, June.
    8. Danny Miller & Isabelle Le Breton–Miller, 2017. "Sources of Entrepreneurial Courage and Imagination: Three Perspectives, Three Contexts," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 41(5), pages 667-675, September.
    9. Arokodare, M. A. & Asikhia, O. U., 2020. "The Moderating Effect of External Environment on the Relationship Between Strategic Entrepreneurship and Performance of Selected Oil and Gas Service Firms in Lagos and Rivers States, Nigeria," Review of European Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(2), pages 1-85, June.
    10. Pekka Stenholm & Zoltán J. Ács & Robert Wuebker, 2015. "Exploring country-level institutional arrangements on the rate and type of entrepreneurial activity," Chapters, in: Global Entrepreneurship, Institutions and Incentives, chapter 20, pages 387-404, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. David Courpasson & Françoise Dany & Ignasi Martí, 2016. "Organizational Entrepreneurship as Active Resistance: A Struggle against Outsourcing," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 40(1), pages 131-160, January.
    12. Paul Hong & Stephen K. Callaway & Soon W. Hong, 2016. "Open network innovation in the age of complexity: case for small and medium enterprises," International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(1), pages 65-86.
    13. Rosa Caiazza & Maksim Belitski & David B. Audretsch, 2020. "From latent to emergent entrepreneurship: the knowledge spillover construction circle," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 694-704, June.
    14. Sam Tavassoli & Lars Bengtsson & Charlie Karlsson, 2017. "Strategic entrepreneurship and knowledge spillovers: spatial and aspatial perspectives," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 233-249, March.
    15. Jan Lampe & Priscilla Sarai Kraft & Andreas Bausch, 2020. "Mapping the Field of Research on Entrepreneurial Organizations (1937–2016): A Bibliometric Analysis and Research Agenda," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 44(4), pages 784-816, July.
    16. Marina Estrada-Cruz & Noelia Rodriguez-Hernández & Antonio J. Verdú-Jover & Jose Maria Gómez-Gras, 2022. "The effect of competitive intensity on the relationship between strategic entrepreneurship and organizational results," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 1-24, March.
    17. Parker Jennifer & Corner Patricia Doyle & Woodfield Paul J. & Singh Smita, 2021. "Developing Endogenous Innovations: Corporate Entrepreneurship and Effectuation," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, January.
    18. Sumaira Jan & Arif Anwar, 2021. "Analyzing Strategic Entrepreneurship Among Women Entrepreneurs of Jammu and Kashmir: Model Building Through Structural Equation Modelling," International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management (IJABIM), IGI Global, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, July.
    19. Maurice J. Lyver & Ta-Jung Lu, 2018. "Sustaining Innovation Performance in SMEs: Exploring the Roles of Strategic Entrepreneurship and IT Capabilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-27, February.
    20. Cardona Montoya, Raúl Armando & Martins, Izaias & Velásquez Ceballos, Hermilson, 2017. "Entrepreneurial orientation, assessment and management of projects and impact in corporate entrepreneurship: intention to action," Cuadernos de Gestión, Universidad del País Vasco - Instituto de Economía Aplicada a la Empresa (IEAE).
    21. Deryck J van Rensburg, 2013. "Is Strategic Entrepreneurship a Pleonasm?," Journal of Management and Strategy, Journal of Management and Strategy, Sciedu Press, vol. 4(1), pages 15-27, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:1030-:d:726751. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.