IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i23p16137-d992105.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimizing Maize Belt Width Enhances Productivity in Wheat/Maize Intercropping Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Guodong Chen

    (College of Agronomy, Tarim University, Alar 843300, China)

  • Yunlong Zhai

    (College of Agronomy, Tarim University, Alar 843300, China)

  • Jianguo Zhou

    (College of Agronomy, Tarim University, Alar 843300, China)

  • Yanfang Li

    (College of Agronomy, Tarim University, Alar 843300, China)

  • Jiao Lin

    (College of Agronomy, Tarim University, Alar 843300, China)

  • Sumei Wan

    (College of Agronomy, Tarim University, Alar 843300, China)

  • Quanzhong Wu

    (College of Agronomy, Tarim University, Alar 843300, China)

Abstract

Wheat/maize intercropping has been widely practiced in northwestern China. It is crucial to optimize the canopy structure and geometric configurations to enhance the performance of the system. This research determined the responses of intercrops to the different canopy structures created by the different wheat/maize intercropping systems. Field experiments were carried out in 2012, 2013, and 2014 at Wuwei, Gansu. Three intercropping patterns—six rows of wheat alternated with two rows of maize (6W2M), six rows of wheat alternated with three rows of maize (6W3M), and six rows of wheat alternated with four rows of maize (6W4M)—were compared with sole wheat and sole maize. The results showed that maize plant heights differed between the inner rows and the border rows, and the difference was greater for the 6W3M system than for the 6W4M system. The three intercropping systems had an average land-use equivalent ratio (LER, calculated based on grain yield) of 1.25, indicating an increase in land-use efficiency by 25% compared to the corresponding sole crops. The shape of maize strips in 6W3M optimized the canopy structure and increased the productivity of wheat and maize. The wheat in 6W3M had significantly more grain yield compared with the sole wheat and the 6W2M due to the maize belt shape, which resulted in the soil evaporation negatively affecting the intercropped wheat grain yield of the 6W3M. Similarly, the maize belt shape facilitated the light penetration and enhanced the reproductive growth by increasing the two cobs per plant rate (TCR) of the maize. The highest TCR of the 6W3M produced a higher maize grain yield than the 6W2M and sole maize in the three growing seasons. The maize belt width in the strip intercropping system had a significant effect on the grain yield of both wheat and maize, which reduced water evaporation, harmonized light distribution, and increased productivity.

Suggested Citation

  • Guodong Chen & Yunlong Zhai & Jianguo Zhou & Yanfang Li & Jiao Lin & Sumei Wan & Quanzhong Wu, 2022. "Optimizing Maize Belt Width Enhances Productivity in Wheat/Maize Intercropping Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-16, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:16137-:d:992105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/16137/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/16137/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ai, Pengrui & Ma, Yingjie & Hai, Ying, 2021. "Influence of jujube/cotton intercropping on soil temperature and crop evapotranspiration in an arid area," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    2. Miao, Qingfeng & Rosa, Ricardo D. & Shi, Haibin & Paredes, Paula & Zhu, Li & Dai, Jiaxin & Gonçalves, José M. & Pereira, Luis S., 2016. "Modeling water use, transpiration and soil evaporation of spring wheat–maize and spring wheat–sunflower relay intercropping using the dual crop coefficient approach," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 211-229.
    3. Qinqin Xu & Kangning Xiong & Yongkuan Chi & Shuzhen Song, 2021. "Effects of Crop and Grass Intercropping on the Soil Environment in the Karst Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-14, May.
    4. Wang, Zikui & Wu, Pute & Zhao, Xining & Gao, Ying & Chen, Xiaoli, 2015. "Water use and crop coefficient of the wheat–maize strip intercropping system for an arid region in northwestern China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 77-85.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hongguang Yang & Wei Sun & Feng Wu & Hongbo Xu & Fengwei Gu & Zhichao Hu, 2023. "Determination of Planting Pattern and Screening of Agricultural Machineries for Maize-Peanut Strip Intercropping: A Case Study in Henan Province of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-16, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cao, Zhaodan & Zhu, Tingju & Cai, Ximing, 2023. "Hydro-agro-economic optimization for irrigated farming in an arid region: The Hetao Irrigation District, Inner Mongolia," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    2. Wu, Zhangsheng & Li, Yue & Wang, Rong & Xu, Xu & Ren, Dongyang & Huang, Quanzhong & Xiong, Yunwu & Huang, Guanhua, 2023. "Evaluation of irrigation water saving and salinity control practices of maize and sunflower in the upper Yellow River basin with an agro-hydrological model based method," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    3. Jovanovic, N. & Pereira, L.S. & Paredes, P. & Pôças, I. & Cantore, V. & Todorovic, M., 2020. "A review of strategies, methods and technologies to reduce non-beneficial consumptive water use on farms considering the FAO56 methods," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    4. Pereira, L.S. & Paredes, P. & Melton, F. & Johnson, L. & Mota, M. & Wang, T., 2021. "Prediction of crop coefficients from fraction of ground cover and height: Practical application to vegetable, field and fruit crops with focus on parameterization," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    5. Liu, Meihan & Paredes, Paula & Shi, Haibin & Ramos, Tiago B. & Dou, Xu & Dai, Liping & Pereira, Luis S., 2022. "Impacts of a shallow saline water table on maize evapotranspiration and groundwater contribution using static water table lysimeters and the dual Kc water balance model SIMDualKc," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    6. Haofang Yan & Song Huang & Jianyun Zhang & Chuan Zhang & Guoqing Wang & Lanlan Li & Shuang Zhao & Mi Li & Baoshan Zhao, 2022. "Comparison of Shuttleworth–Wallace and Dual Crop Coefficient Method for Estimating Evapotranspiration of a Tea Field in Southeast China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, September.
    7. Pereira, L.S. & Paredes, P. & Hunsaker, D.J. & López-Urrea, R. & Mohammadi Shad, Z., 2021. "Standard single and basal crop coefficients for field crops. Updates and advances to the FAO56 crop water requirements method," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    8. Liu, Meihan & Shi, Haibin & Paredes, Paula & Ramos, Tiago B. & Dai, Liping & Feng, Zhuangzhuang & Pereira, Luis S., 2022. "Estimating and partitioning maize evapotranspiration as affected by salinity using weighing lysimeters and the SIMDualKc model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    9. Zhao, Tianxing & Zhu, Yan & Ye, Ming & Yang, Jinzhong & Jia, Biao & Mao, Wei & Wu, Jingwei, 2022. "A new approach for estimating spatial-temporal phreatic evapotranspiration at a regional scale using NDVI and water table depth measurements," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    10. Pengrui Ai & Yingjie Ma, 2020. "Estimation of Evapotranspiration of a Jujube/Cotton Intercropping System in an Arid Area Based on the Dual Crop Coefficient Method," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-14, March.
    11. Shao, Guomin & Han, Wenting & Zhang, Huihui & Zhang, Liyuan & Wang, Yi & Zhang, Yu, 2023. "Prediction of maize crop coefficient from UAV multisensor remote sensing using machine learning methods," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    12. Liu, Haijun & Wang, Xuming & Zhang, Xian & Zhang, Liwei & Li, Yan & Huang, Guanhua, 2017. "Evaluation on the responses of maize (Zea mays L.) growth, yield and water use efficiency to drip irrigation water under mulch condition in the Hetao irrigation District of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 144-157.
    13. Yang, Tao & Ouyang, Xueying & Wang, Bo & Tian, Di & Xu, Cheng & Lin, Zeyang & Ge, Xiaomin & Tang, Luozhong, 2023. "Understanding the effects of tree-crop intercropping systems on crop production in China by combining field experiments with a meta-analysis," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    14. Liu, Zhongyi & Chen, Hang & Huo, Zailin & Wang, Fengxin & Shock, Clinton C., 2016. "Analysis of the contribution of groundwater to evapotranspiration in an arid irrigation district with shallow water table," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 131-141.
    15. Rong, Yao & Dai, Xiaoqin & Wang, Weishu & Wu, Peijin & Huo, Zailin, 2023. "Dependence of evapotranspiration validity on shallow groundwater in arid area-a three years field observation experiment," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    16. Hui Cao & Hongbo Wang & Yong Li & Abdoul Kader Mounkaila Hamani & Nan Zhang & Xingpeng Wang & Yang Gao, 2021. "Evapotranspiration Partition and Dual Crop Coefficients in Apple Orchard with Dwarf Stocks and Dense Planting in Arid Region, Aksu Oasis, Southern Xinjiang," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-16, November.
    17. Chen, Shuai & Mao, Xiaomin & Shang, Songhao, 2022. "Response and contribution of shallow groundwater to soil water/salt budget and crop growth in layered soils," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    18. Fan Fan & Bei Li & Weifeng Zhang & John R. Porter & Fusuo Zhang, 2021. "Evaluation of Sustainability of Irrigated Crops in Arid Regions, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, January.
    19. Zhou, Lifeng & Feng, Hao & Zhao, Ying & Qi, Zhijuan & Zhang, Tibin & He, Jianqiang & Dyck, Miles, 2017. "Drip irrigation lateral spacing and mulching affects the wetting pattern, shoot-root regulation, and yield of maize in a sand-layered soil," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 114-123.
    20. Gong, Xiangwei & Dang, Ke & Liu, Long & Zhao, Guan & Lv, Siming & Tian, Lixin & Jin, Fei & Feng, Yu & Zhao, Yingnan & Feng, Baili, 2021. "Intercropping combined with nitrogen input promotes proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) growth and resource use efficiency to increase grain yield on the Loess plateau of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:16137-:d:992105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.