IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i23p16092-d990936.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Monetized Estimates of the Ecosystem Service Value of Urban Blue and Green Infrastructure and Analysis: A Case Study of Changsha, China

Author

Listed:
  • Xujie Gong

    (Chang Tech International, Inc., Ellicott City, MD 21042, USA)

  • Chein-Chi Chang

    (Chang Tech International, Inc., Ellicott City, MD 21042, USA
    School of Energy and Civil Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150006, China)

Abstract

Urban blue-green infrastructure (BGI) forms the basis of a regional ecosystem. Quantitative calculations can identify the weak points of a typical ecological environment, which is helpful for providing a basis for the spatial planning and ecological environment protection of developing cities. Currently, assessment of BGI ecosystem services focuses on local temperature, climate, and entertainment aesthetics, and the integrity of ecological indicators needs improvement. The assessment is usually conducted within large blue-green areas such as parks and rivers, and street greening is typically ignored. Roof gardens and unmanaged blue-green spaces also have ecosystem service functions. Therefore, our study aimed to extract the basic design distribution of urban blue-green spaces more accurately and monetize the value of its ecosystem services. Changsha, one of the top ten ecologically competitive cities in China, was the research focus. First, four types of BGI, forest, grassland, wetland, and waterbody, were extracted using remote sensing images and ArcGIS10.8. Second, the adjusted value coefficient was used to quantify the service value and geographic spatial distribution of the four BGI ecosystems in monetary terms. The results showed that in 2020, the total economic value of ecosystem services (ESV) generated by BGI in the study area was CNY 36.25 billion. Among ecosystem services, forest land climate regulation and waterbody hydrological regulation accounted for the largest proportion, at CNY 6.543 and 15.132 billion, respectively. The urban center had the weakest climate regulation capacity, and the Xiangjiang River Basin had the strongest hydrological regulation capacity. The urban center had the lowest ESV, thus requiring the attention of urban planners in the future. This study evaluated and optimized the distribution of BGI in Changsha according to the ESV of the existing BGI to help improve the ESV of the city center and create a green, ecological, and healthy city.

Suggested Citation

  • Xujie Gong & Chein-Chi Chang, 2022. "Monetized Estimates of the Ecosystem Service Value of Urban Blue and Green Infrastructure and Analysis: A Case Study of Changsha, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:16092-:d:990936
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/16092/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/16092/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fangzheng Li & Fen Zhang & Xiong Li & Peng Wang & Junhui Liang & Yuting Mei & Wenwen Cheng & Yun Qian, 2017. "Spatiotemporal Patterns of the Use of Urban Green Spaces and External Factors Contributing to Their Use in Central Beijing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Zheng, Haijin & Nie, Xiaofei & Liu, Zhao & Mo, Minghao & Song, Yuejun, 2021. "Identifying optimal ridge practices under different rainfall types on runoff and soil loss from sloping farmland in a humid subtropical region of Southern China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    3. Shittu, Waliu & Adedoyin, Festus Fatai & Shah, Muhammad Ibrahim & Musibau, Hammed Oluwaseyi, 2021. "An investigation of the nexus between natural resources, environmental performance, energy security and environmental degradation: Evidence from Asia," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    4. Christine Meschede, 2020. "The Sustainable Development Goals in Scientific Literature: A Bibliometric Overview at the Meta-Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-14, June.
    5. Daowei Zhang & Anne Stenger, 2015. "Value and valuation of forest ecosystem services," Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(2), pages 129-140, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qian Zhou & Feng Gui & Benxuan Zhao & Jingyi Liu & Huiwen Cai & Kaida Xu & Sheng Zhao, 2024. "Examining the Social Costs of Carbon Emissions and the Ecosystem Service Value in Island Ecosystems: An Analysis of the Zhoushan Archipelago," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-19, January.
    2. Yajing Shao & Xuefeng Yuan & Chaoqun Ma & Ruifang Ma & Zhaoxia Ren, 2020. "Quantifying the Spatial Association between Land Use Change and Ecosystem Services Value: A Case Study in Xi’an, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-20, May.
    3. Bin Huang & Zaijian Yuan & Mingguo Zheng & Yishan Liao & Kim Loi Nguyen & Thi Hong Nguyen & Samran Sombatpanit & Dingqiang Li, 2022. "Soil and Water Conservation Techniques in Tropical and Subtropical Asia: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, April.
    4. Xu, Deyi & Sheraz, Muhammad & Hassan, Arshad & Sinha, Avik & Ullah, Saif, 2022. "Financial development, renewable energy and CO2 emission in G7 countries: New evidence from non-linear and asymmetric analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    5. Yugang He, 2022. "Renewable and Non-Renewable Energy Consumption and Trade Policy: Do They Matter for Environmental Sustainability?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-17, May.
    6. Xiong, Yuyu & Guo, Hongxiang & Nor, Datin Dr Mariani Md & Song, Andong & Dai, Li, 2023. "Mineral resources depletion, environmental degradation, and exploitation of natural resources: COVID-19 aftereffects," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    7. Fangfang Xun & Yecui Hu & Ling Lv & Jinhui Tong, 2017. "Farmers’ Awareness of Ecosystem Services and the Associated Policy Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-13, September.
    8. Lili Zhang & Baoqing Hu & Ze Zhang & Gaodou Liang & Simin Huang, 2023. "Comprehensive Evaluation of Ecological-Economic Value of Guangxi Based on Land Consolidation," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-25, March.
    9. Shehzad, Khurram & Zeraibi, Ayoub & Zaman, Umer, 2022. "Testing the N-shaped environmental Kuznets Curve in Algeria: An imperious role of natural resources and economic globalization," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    10. Zhen Yang & Weijun Gao, 2022. "Evaluating the Coordinated Development between Urban Greening and Economic Growth in Chinese Cities during 2005 to 2019," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-25, August.
    11. Xinmin Zhang & Hualin Xie & Jiaying Shi & Tiangui Lv & Caihua Zhou & Wangda Liu, 2020. "Assessing Changes in Ecosystem Service Values in Response to Land Cover Dynamics in Jiangxi Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-15, April.
    12. Liu, Yang & Wang, Jianda & Dong, Kangyin & Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad, 2023. "How does natural resource abundance affect green total factor productivity in the era of green finance? Global evidence," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    13. Lili Du & Yunbing Hou & Shuheng Zhong & Kai Qu, 2023. "Identification of Priority Areas for Ecological Restoration in Coal Mining Areas with a High Groundwater Table Based on Ecological Security Pattern and Ecological Vulnerability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-22, December.
    14. Shiliang Liu & Yuhong Dong & Hua Liu & Fangfang Wang & Lu Yu, 2023. "Review of Valuation of Forest Ecosystem Services and Realization Approaches in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, May.
    15. Josset, Clement & Shanafelt, David W. & Abildtrup, Jens & Stenger, Anne, 2023. "Probabilistic typology of private forest owners: A tool to target the development of new market for ecosystem services," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    16. Hossain, Md. Emran & Islam, Md. Sayemul & Bandyopadhyay, Arunava & Awan, Ashar & Hossain, Mohammad Razib & Rej, Soumen, 2022. "Mexico at the crossroads of natural resource dependence and COP26 pledge: Does technological innovation help?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    17. Liane Pinho Santos & João F. Proença, 2022. "Developing Return Supply Chain: A Research on the Automotive Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-24, May.
    18. Anne Stenger & Patrice Harou, 2015. "Special issue on forest investments profitability," Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(2), pages 125-128, July.
    19. Sebastian Czernik & Marta Marcinek & Bartosz Michałowski & Michał Piasecki & Justyna Tomaszewska & Jacek Michalak, 2020. "Environmental Footprint of Cementitious Adhesives—Components of ETICS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-13, October.
    20. Yuhan Yu & Mengmeng Yu & Lu Lin & Jiaxin Chen & Dongjie Li & Wenting Zhang & Kai Cao, 2019. "National Green GDP Assessment and Prediction for China Based on a CA-Markov Land Use Simulation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-19, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:16092-:d:990936. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.