IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/natres/v49y2025i3p3140-3163.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic nexus between natural resource rents, economic growth, and environmental quality: A comparative study between China and the US

Author

Listed:
  • Daohua Wang
  • Ziheng Niu
  • Ning Li
  • Yu Zhang
  • Zongsen Zou

Abstract

Economic development and environmental sustainability have recently become global priorities. This study utilizes the nonlinear autoregressive distribution lag model (NARDL) to investigate the asymmetric effects of natural resource rents on economic growth and environmental quality in China and the United States from 1970 to 2020. The findings indicate that natural resource rents exert asymmetric effects on economic growth and environmental quality in both countries; however, the impact patterns differ between the two countries. In the short term, a decrease in natural resource rents significantly increases GDP per capita in the US, while an increase in natural resource rents has no effect. Moreover, natural resource rents do not influence the ecological footprint in the US. By contrast, China's GDP per capita remains unaffected by natural resource rents, while the ecological footprint is significantly influenced by both positive and negative changes in natural resource rents, exhibiting asymmetric impacts. In the long run, an increase in natural resource rents significantly impacts both GDP per capita and the ecological footprint in the US, while a decrease only impacts the ecological footprint. By contrast, both increases and decreases in natural resource rents impact per capita GDP and the ecological footprint in China. These findings highlight the importance of tailoring country‐specific policies to facilitate sustainable economic development and enhance environmental quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Daohua Wang & Ziheng Niu & Ning Li & Yu Zhang & Zongsen Zou, 2025. "Dynamic nexus between natural resource rents, economic growth, and environmental quality: A comparative study between China and the US," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 49(3), pages 3140-3163, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:natres:v:49:y:2025:i:3:p:3140-3163
    DOI: 10.1111/1477-8947.12528
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.12528
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1477-8947.12528?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:natres:v:49:y:2025:i:3:p:3140-3163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1477-8947 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.