IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i23p15535-d980680.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of Extended Set Pair Analysis on Wear Risk Evaluation of Backfill Pipeline

Author

Listed:
  • Zaihai Wu

    (Backfill Engineering Laboratory, Shandong Gold Mining Co., Ltd., Yantai 265419, China)

  • Zhaojun Qi

    (Backfill Engineering Laboratory, Shandong Gold Mining Co., Ltd., Yantai 265419, China)

  • Yunpeng Kou

    (Backfill Engineering Laboratory, Shandong Gold Mining Co., Ltd., Yantai 265419, China)

  • Zheng Li

    (School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Guoyan Zhao

    (School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Weizhang Liang

    (School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

Abstract

Filling slurry can inevitably cause irreversible wear to the pipeline, which represents great costs to mines. This study aims to propose an extended set pair analysis (SPA) for the wear risk evaluation of backfill pipeline. First, to fully describe the wear risk of backfill pipeline, an evaluation index system was established from the aspects of slurry characteristics, pipeline properties, and slurry flow state. Then, the experts grading method was modified with probabilistic linguistic term sets (PLTSs) to obtain subjective weights. Meanwhile, the criteria importance through intercriteria correlation (CRITIC) approach was used to calculate objective weights. By introducing a preference coefficient, they were integrated to determine the comprehensive weights. After that, the classical SPA was extended with membership functions and fuzzy entropy theory, so that the wear risk of backfill pipeline can be evaluated from the perspectives of both the risk level and complexity. Finally, the proposed methodology was applied to assess the wear risk in the Jinchuan nickel mine, Dahongshan copper mine, Hedong gold mine, and Xincheng gold mine. The reliability of evaluation results was further verified through sensitivity and comparative analyses. Results indicate that the proposed methodology is feasible for the wear risk evaluation of backfill pipeline, and can provide guidance on the wear risk management.

Suggested Citation

  • Zaihai Wu & Zhaojun Qi & Yunpeng Kou & Zheng Li & Guoyan Zhao & Weizhang Liang, 2022. "Application of Extended Set Pair Analysis on Wear Risk Evaluation of Backfill Pipeline," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-17, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15535-:d:980680
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/15535/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/15535/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rui Wang & Qiang Zhao & Hui Sun & Xuedong Zhang & Yuyue Wang, 2022. "Risk Assessment Model Based on Set Pair Analysis Applied to Airport Bird Strikes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-14, October.
    2. Enliang Guo & Jiquan Zhang & Xuehui Ren & Qi Zhang & Zhongyi Sun, 2014. "Integrated risk assessment of flood disaster based on improved set pair analysis and the variable fuzzy set theory in central Liaoning Province, China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 74(2), pages 947-965, November.
    3. Qinqiang Guo & Haoxuan Yu & Zhenyu Dan & Shuai Li, 2021. "Mining Method Optimization of Gently Inclined and Soft Broken Complex Ore Body Based on AHP and TOPSIS: Taking Miao-Ling Gold Mine of China as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-14, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aorui Bi & Shuya Huang & Xinguo Sun, 2023. "Risk Assessment of Oil and Gas Pipeline Based on Vague Set-Weighted Set Pair Analysis Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Enliang Guo & Jiquan Zhang & Yongfang Wang & Ha Si & Feng Zhang, 2016. "Dynamic risk assessment of waterlogging disaster for maize based on CERES-Maize model in Midwest of Jilin Province, China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 83(3), pages 1747-1761, September.
    3. Junnan Xiong & Chongchong Ye & Weiming Cheng & Liang Guo & Chenghu Zhou & Xiaolei Zhang, 2019. "The Spatiotemporal Distribution of Flash Floods and Analysis of Partition Driving Forces in Yunnan Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, May.
    4. Cui, Yi & Zhou, Yuliang & Jin, Juliang & Jiang, Shangming & Wu, Chengguo & Ning, Shaowei, 2023. "Spatiotemporal characteristics and obstacle factors identification of agricultural drought disaster risk: A case study across Anhui Province, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    5. Shuai Li & Lifeng Yu & Wanjun Jiang & Haoxuan Yu & Xinmin Wang, 2022. "The Recent Progress China Has Made in Green Mine Construction, Part I: Mining Groundwater Pollution and Sustainable Mining," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-19, May.
    6. Kun Cheng & Qiang Fu & Tianxiao Li & Qiuxiang Jiang & Wei Liu, 2015. "Regional food security risk assessment under the coordinated development of water resources," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 78(1), pages 603-619, August.
    7. Kerim Koc & Zeynep Işık, 2020. "A multi-agent-based model for sustainable governance of urban flood risk mitigation measures," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 104(1), pages 1079-1110, October.
    8. Shutian Zhou & Guofang Zhai, 2023. "A Multi-Hazard Risk Assessment Framework for Urban Disaster Prevention Planning: A Case Study of Xiamen, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-19, October.
    9. Ruiling Sun & Ge Gao & Zaiwu Gong & Jie Wu, 2020. "A review of risk analysis methods for natural disasters," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 100(2), pages 571-593, January.
    10. Qingmu Su, 2020. "Long-term flood risk assessment of watersheds under climate change based on the game cross-efficiency DEA," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 104(3), pages 2213-2237, December.
    11. Yongfang Wang & Jiquan Zhang & Enliang Guo & Zhongyi Sun, 2015. "Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation-Based Disaster Risk Assessment of Desertification in Horqin Sand Land, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-23, February.
    12. Chengguang Lai & Xiaohong Chen & Zhaoli Wang & Haijun Yu & Xiaoyan Bai, 2020. "Flood Risk Assessment and Regionalization from Past and Future Perspectives at Basin Scale," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(7), pages 1399-1417, July.
    13. Ahmed M. A. Shohda & Mahrous A. M. Ali & Gaofeng Ren & Jong-Gwan Kim & Ahmed M. Abdo & Wael R. Abdellah & Abbas M. Hassan, 2022. "Sustainable Assignment of Egyptian Ornamental Stones for Interior and Exterior Building Finishes Using the AHP-TOPSIS Technique," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    14. Bahram Choubin & Farzaneh Sajedi Hosseini & Omid Rahmati & Mansor Mehdizadeh Youshanloei, 2023. "A step toward considering the return period in flood spatial modeling," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 115(1), pages 431-460, January.
    15. Ruiling Sun & Zaiwu Gong & Weiwei Guo & Ashfaq Ahmad Shah & Jie Wu & Haiying Xu, 2022. "Flood disaster risk assessment of and countermeasures toward Yangtze River Delta by considering index interaction," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 112(1), pages 475-500, May.
    16. Junfei Chen & Menghua Deng & Lu Xia & Huimin Wang, 2017. "Risk Assessment of Drought, Based on IDM-VFS in the Nanpan River Basin, Yunnan Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-16, June.
    17. Yenan Wu & Ping-an Zhong & Yu Zhang & Bin Xu & Biao Ma & Kun Yan, 2015. "Integrated flood risk assessment and zonation method: a case study in Huaihe River basin, China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 78(1), pages 635-651, August.
    18. Xianghai Li & Mengjie Li & Kaikai Cui & Tao Lu & Yanli Xie & Delin Liu, 2022. "Evaluation of Comprehensive Emergency Capacity to Urban Flood Disaster: An Example from Zhengzhou City in Henan Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, October.
    19. Mengtian Lu & Siyu Wang & Xiaoying Wang & Weihong Liao & Chao Wang & Xiaohui Lei & Hao Wang, 2022. "An Assessment of Temporal and Spatial Dynamics of Regional Water Resources Security in the DPSIR Framework in Jiangxi Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-21, March.
    20. Xue Jin & U. Rashid Sumaila & Kedong Yin, 2020. "Direct and Indirect Loss Evaluation of Storm Surge Disaster Based on Static and Dynamic Input-Output Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-25, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15535-:d:980680. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.