IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i22p15364-d977159.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the Construction and Measurement of the HQDMI Evaluation Index System—A Case Study of China

Author

Listed:
  • Yongqiang Su

    (School of Management and Economics, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China)

  • Jinfa Shi

    (School of Management and Economics, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China)

  • Manman Zhang

    (School of Management and Economics, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China)

Abstract

Scientific and accurate evaluations of the high-quality development level of the manufacturing industry have important theoretical significance and reference value for the government and for decision-making departments for the formulation of corresponding incentive measures. Firstly, based on rough set theory, this paper proposes an attribute reduction method, which can help to delete redundant indexes and reduce the calculation workload. Secondly, a more scientific combination weighting method is proposed, and the calculation method of the total index in an evaluation index system is given. Finally, the HQDMI evaluation index system is constructed based on the connotations of the high-quality development of the manufacturing industry. Taking China as an example, the total index and sub-index of high-quality development of 30 provinces in China are calculated, the high-quality development level of the manufacturing industry in 30 provinces is clustered based on SPSS24.0, and the visualization of the clustering results is achieved by ArcGIS software. The results show that the high-quality development level of China’s manufacturing industry has regional distribution characteristics. Regions with high development levels are mainly distributed in eastern coastal areas, followed by the central development level, and those of the northeast and west are low. This study provides a theoretical application mode for the evaluation of the high-quality development level of the manufacturing industry, and it has theoretical guidance significance for promoting the high-quality development of the manufacturing industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Yongqiang Su & Jinfa Shi & Manman Zhang, 2022. "Research on the Construction and Measurement of the HQDMI Evaluation Index System—A Case Study of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-30, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:15364-:d:977159
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/15364/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/15364/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zon-Yau Lee & Mei-Tai Chu & Shiuann-Shuoh Chen & Chih-Hung Tsai, 2018. "Identifying Comprehensive Key Criteria of Sustainable Development for Traditional Manufacturing in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-19, September.
    2. Mirco Peron & Giuseppe Fragapane & Fabio Sgarbossa & Michael Kay, 2020. "Digital Facility Layout Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Sujit Singh & Ezutah Udoncy Olugu & Siti Nurmaya Musa & Abu Bakar Mahat, 2018. "Fuzzy-based sustainability evaluation method for manufacturing SMEs using balanced scorecard framework," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 1-18, January.
    4. Mohamed Abubakr & Adel T. Abbas & Italo Tomaz & Mahmoud S. Soliman & Monis Luqman & Hussien Hegab, 2020. "Sustainable and Smart Manufacturing: An Integrated Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-19, March.
    5. Eduard Gabriel Ceptureanu & Sebastian Ion Ceptureanu & Razvan Bologa & Ramona Bologa, 2018. "Impact of Competitive Capabilities on Sustainable Manufacturing Applications in Romanian SMEs from the Textile Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fen Lyu & Gang Wu, 2023. "A DPSR and SEM Based Framework to Evaluate High-Quality Development in Chinese Manufacturing Industry," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zixin Dou & Yanming Sun & Tao Wang & Huiyin Wan & Shiqi Fan, 2021. "Exploring Regional Advanced Manufacturing and Its Driving Factors: A Case Study of the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-14, May.
    2. Jeoung Yul Lee & Ilkhom Okmirzaevich Irisboev & Yeon-Sik Ryu, 2021. "Literature Review on Digitalization in Facilities Management and Facilities Management Performance Measurement: Contribution of Industry 4.0 in the Global Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-29, December.
    3. Zixin Dou & BeiBei Wu & Yanming Sun & Tao Wang, 2021. "The Competitiveness of Manufacturing and Its Driving Factors: A Case Study of G20 Participating Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, January.
    4. Arindam Das, 2023. "The Relationship between International Trade in Industry 4.0 Products and National-Level Sustainability Performance: An Empirical Investigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-15, January.
    5. Meiling Li & Lijie Zhang & Zhuangzhuang Zhang, 2023. "Impact of Digital Economy on Inter-Regional Trade: An Empirical Analysis in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-22, August.
    6. Jae Hong Park & Phil Goo Kang & Eunseok Kim & Tae Woo Kim & Gahee Kim & Heejeong Seok & Jinwon Seo, 2021. "Introduction of IoT-Based Surrogate Parameters in the Ex-Post Countermeasure of Industrial Sectors in Integrated Permit Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-22, December.
    7. Gustavo Dambiski Gomes de Carvalho & Luis Mauricio Martins de Resende & Joseane Pontes & Hélio Gomes de Carvalho & Leozenir Mendes Betim, 2021. "Innovation and Management in MSMEs: A Literature Review of Highly Cited Papers," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, October.
    8. Giuditta Contini & Margherita Peruzzini, 2022. "Sustainability and Industry 4.0: Definition of a Set of Key Performance Indicators for Manufacturing Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-37, September.
    9. Jie Xue & Zhenyan Li & Xian Wang & Yanli Ji, 2022. "Dynamic Evaluation and Spatial Characteristics of Smart Manufacturing Capability in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-18, August.
    10. Veera Babu Ramakurthi & Vijaya Kumar Manupati & Leonilde Varela & Goran Putnik, 2023. "Leveraging Blockchain to Support Collaborative Distributed Manufacturing Scheduling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-23, February.
    11. Daniel RUSU & Doriana SANDU & Maria FRANGIEH, 2020. "Aspects of Innovation and Leadership in Small and Medium Enterprises," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 21(5), pages 659-673, December.
    12. Azemeraw Tadesse Mengistu & Roberto Panizzolo, 2023. "Analysis of indicators used for measuring industrial sustainability: a systematic review," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 1979-2005, March.
    13. Lorena Espina-Romero & Jesús Guerrero-Alcedo, 2022. "Fields Touched by Digitalization: Analysis of Scientific Activity in Scopus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, November.
    14. Sarfaraz Hashemkhani Zolfani & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Payam Khazaelpour & Fausto Cavallaro, 2018. "The Multi-Aspect Criterion in the PMADM Outline and Its Possible Application to Sustainability Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-15, November.
    15. Amr Salem & Connor Hopkins & Mohamd Imad & Hussien Hegab & Basil Darras & Hossam A. Kishawy, 2020. "Environmental Analysis of Sustainable and Traditional Cooling and Lubrication Strategies during Machining Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-22, October.
    16. Donggi Kim & Keuntae Cho, 2022. "Digital Transformation Characteristics of the Semiconductor Industry Ecosystem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.
    17. Andra-Ileana Neicu & Anamaria-Cătălina Radu & Gheorghe Zaman & Ivona Stoica & Florian Răpan, 2020. "Cloud Computing Usage in SMEs. An Empirical Study Based on SMEs Employees Perceptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-14, June.
    18. Kateryna Boichenko & Mário Nuno Mata & Pedro Neves Mata & Jéssica Nunes Martins, 2021. "Impact of Financial Support on Textile Enterprises’ Development," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-19, March.
    19. Seyed Amirali Hoseini & Alireza Fallahpour & Kuan Yew Wong & Amir Mahdiyar & Morteza Saberi & Serdar Durdyev, 2021. "Sustainable Supplier Selection in Construction Industry through Hybrid Fuzzy-Based Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, January.
    20. László Péter Pusztai & Lajos Nagy & István Budai, 2023. "A Risk Management Framework for Industry 4.0 Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-19, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:15364-:d:977159. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.