IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i21p14305-d960567.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Theory of Exploitation as a Support for Management Accounting in an Enterprise

Author

Listed:
  • Przemysław Drożyner

    (Departament of Technical Science, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Oczapowskiego 11 Street, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland)

  • Stanisław Młynarski

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24 Street, 31-155 Kraków, Poland)

Abstract

In each company operating on the market, various business processes are implemented: production, logistics, warehouse, marketing, HR and payroll and many others. In enterprises with a high organizational culture, these processes are always measured; various indicators related to the effectiveness and efficiency of these processes are measured and analyzed, and on this basis management decisions are made for the entire enterprise. The aim of this work was to verify the assumption that by properly defining the process of “exploitation” of technical objects (understood as the combination of the processes of operation and maintenance), it is possible to obtain information not only about the effectiveness of this process itself, but also about other business processes carried out in companies. For this purpose, the so-called “exploitation states” characteristic of technical objects used in two different types of small enterprises, i.e., mechanical workshops and taxi enterprises, were defined. Then, in two such workshops and three taxi companies, the time spent by the objects in defined states was measured, and the results were analyzed. We found significant differences in these values even for companies of a similar size and nature. After discussing the results with the owners of the companies, it was found that the differences resulted from different visions of the functioning of each company and—which is very important—their context. In the following, it was shown that properly defining and measuring the exploitation states of technical objects can be useful for improving not only “technical” processes but also most of the business processes carried out in enterprises.

Suggested Citation

  • Przemysław Drożyner & Stanisław Młynarski, 2022. "The Theory of Exploitation as a Support for Management Accounting in an Enterprise," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-14, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14305-:d:960567
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14305/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14305/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Małgorzata Jasiulewicz-Kaczmarek & Katarzyna Antosz & Ryszard Wyczółkowski & Dariusz Mazurkiewicz & Bo Sun & Cheng Qian & Yi Ren, 2021. "Application of MICMAC, Fuzzy AHP, and Fuzzy TOPSIS for Evaluation of the Maintenance Factors Affecting Sustainable Manufacturing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-30, March.
    2. Maria Holgado & Marco Macchi & Stephen Evans, 2020. "Exploring the impacts and contributions of maintenance function for sustainable manufacturing," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(23), pages 7292-7310, December.
    3. Ait-El-Cadi, Abdessamad & Gharbi, Ali & Dhouib, Karem & Artiba, Abdelhakim, 2021. "Integrated production, maintenance and quality control policy for unreliable manufacturing systems under dynamic inspection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    4. Gonçalo Cardeal & Kristina Höse & Inês Ribeiro & Uwe Götze, 2020. "Sustainable Business Models–Canvas for Sustainability, Evaluation Method, and Their Application to Additive Manufacturing in Aircraft Maintenance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-22, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Simon Stork & Rolf Morgenstern & Bernd Pölling & Jan-Henning Feil, 2023. "Holistic Business Model Conceptualisation—Capturing Sustainability Contributions Illustrated by Nature-Based Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Santos, Augusto César de Jesus & Cavalcante, Cristiano Alexandre Virgínio & Wu, Shaomin, 2023. "Maintenance policies and models: A bibliometric and literature review of strategies for reuse and remanufacturing," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    3. Bojan Obrenovic & Danijela Godinic & Mato Njavro, 2024. "Sustaining company performance during the war-induced crisis using sourcing capability and substitute input," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(12), pages 30001-30026, December.
    4. Wang, Yu & Xia, Tangbin & Xu, Yuhui & Si, Guojin & Wang, Dong & Pan, Ershun & Xi, Lifeng, 2024. "Quality-centered production and maintenance scheduling for multi-machine manufacturing systems under variable operating conditions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    5. Devika Kannan & Parvaneh Gholipour & Chunguang Bai, 2023. "Smart manufacturing as a strategic tool to mitigate sustainable manufacturing challenges: a case approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 331(1), pages 543-579, December.
    6. Biman Darshana Hettiarachchi & Stefan Seuring & Marcus Brandenburg, 2022. "Industry 4.0-driven operations and supply chains for the circular economy: a bibliometric analysis," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 858-878, December.
    7. Tomasz Dziabas & Mariusz Deja & Aleksandra Wiśniewska, 2022. "A Strategy for Managing the Operation of Technical Infrastructure Based on the Analysis of “Bad Actors”—A Case Study of LOTOS Group S.A," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-21, April.
    8. Hamzeh Soltanali & Mehdi Khojastehpour & José Torres Farinha & José Edmundo de Almeida e Pais, 2021. "An Integrated Fuzzy Fault Tree Model with Bayesian Network-Based Maintenance Optimization of Complex Equipment in Automotive Manufacturing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-21, November.
    9. Aikaterini Anagnostopoulou & Dimitris Sotiropoulos & Konstantinos Tserpes, 2025. "A Robust Sustainability Assessment Methodology for Aircraft Parts: Application to a Fuselage Panel," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-33, April.
    10. Vrignat, Pascal & Kratz, Frédéric & Avila, Manuel, 2022. "Sustainable manufacturing, maintenance policies, prognostics and health management: A literature review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    11. Sinisterra, Wilfrido Quiñones & Lima, Victor Hugo Resende & Cavalcante, Cristiano Alexandre Virginio & Aribisala, Adetoye Ayokunle, 2023. "A delay-time model to integrate the sequence of resumable jobs, inspection policy, and quality for a single-component system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    12. Li, Yaping & Chen, Zhen & Xia, Tangbin & Pan, Ershun & Liu, Sifeng, 2025. "Integrated optimization for X-bar control chart, preventive maintenance and production rate," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    13. Muhammad Hamza Naseem & Jiaqi Yang & Ziquan Xiang, 2021. "Prioritizing the Solutions to Reverse Logistics Barriers for the E-Commerce Industry in Pakistan Based on a Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-20, November.
    14. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:special3:p:521-535 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Isam Y. Al-Filali & Reda M. S. Abdulaal & Ammar A. Melaibari, 2023. "A Novel Green Ocean Strategy for Financial Sustainability (GOSFS) in Higher Education Institutions: King Abdulaziz University as a Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, April.
    16. Md Tasbirul Islam & Usha Iyer-Raniga, 2023. "Circular Business Model Value Dimension Canvas: Tool Redesign for Innovation and Validation through an Australian Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-47, July.
    17. Tambe, Pravin P. & Kulkarni, Makarand S., 2022. "A reliability based integrated model of maintenance planning with quality control and production decision for improving operational performance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    18. Alexandre Fernandes Andrade & Heloisa Candia Hollnagel & Fernando de Almeida Santos, 2025. "Servitization as a Circular Economy Strategy: A Brazilian Tertiary Packaging Industry for Logistics and Transportation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-22, July.
    19. Zhang, Hanxiao & Wang, Zhe & Liu, Xingchen & Gaudoin, Olivier & Xie, Min, 2025. "Joint optimization of condition-based production and maintenance with mutual production-deterioration dependencies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    20. Tomasz Rymarczyk & Grzegorz Kłosowski & Anna Hoła & Jan Sikora & Tomasz Wołowiec & Paweł Tchórzewski & Stanisław Skowron, 2021. "Comparison of Machine Learning Methods in Electrical Tomography for Detecting Moisture in Building Walls," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-22, May.
    21. Jingyi Zhao & Chunhai Gao & Tao Tang, 2022. "A Review of Sustainable Maintenance Strategies for Single Component and Multicomponent Equipment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-22, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14305-:d:960567. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.