IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i18p11723-d918444.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving Computational Thinking and Teamwork by Applying Balanced Scorecard for Sustainable Development

Author

Listed:
  • Lung-Chun Chang

    (Department of Information Management, National Taipei University of Business, Taipei City 100, Taiwan)

  • Wen-Cheng Lin

    (Department of Business Administration, National Taipei University of Business, Taipei City 100, Taiwan)

Abstract

This work aimed to analyze the concept of a balance scorecard (BSC) tool integrated with computational thinking (CT) in university education. An experiential approach to learning about the CT through the study of a BSC performance evaluation tool has been reported. The BSC project offers students hands-on experience with the team-based, cross-functional, and strategic aspects of conceptual thinking. This study integrates the four aspects of the BSC into CT to evaluate students through four perspectives. The experiential approach requires each student to compose a team, find information about their motivation, and develop BSC concepts that apply learning performance in a computational thinking course. The conclusion suggests that the BSC project had a positive impact on the students who participated, indicating their overall knowledge and understanding of functional areas and relationships within the teamwork cooperation were enhanced. Our paper reports an experiential method of learning CT by studying BSC performance evaluation tools. The application example can enhance students’ logical thinking, what is indispensable and essential in maintaining competitiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Lung-Chun Chang & Wen-Cheng Lin, 2022. "Improving Computational Thinking and Teamwork by Applying Balanced Scorecard for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-16, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:18:p:11723-:d:918444
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/18/11723/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/18/11723/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Funda Gazi & Tarık Atan & Mahmut Kılıç, 2022. "The Assessment of Internal Indicators on The Balanced Scorecard Measures of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Chiara Mio & Antonio Costantini & Silvia Panfilo, 2022. "Performance measurement tools for sustainable business: A systematic literature review on the sustainability balanced scorecard use," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(2), pages 367-384, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chiuhsiang Joe Lin & Remba Yanuar Efranto, 2023. "Do Age and Gender Change the Perception of Workplace Social Sustainability?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-15, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anike Sult & Janice Wobst & Rainer Lueg, 2024. "The role of training in implementing corporate sustainability: A systematic literature review," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 1-30, January.
    2. Miguel Ángel Moliner‐Tena & Diego Monferrer‐Tirado & Marta Estrada‐Guillén & Lidia Vidal‐Meliá, 2023. "Sustainable service ecosystems from the transformative value perspective: A study in tourism destinations," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 342-357, January.
    3. Robert M. Yawson & Amy K. B. Paros, 2023. "Systems Perspective of the Use of the Balanced Scorecard for Organization Development and Change," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    4. Cosa, Marcello & Urban, Boris, 2023. "A systematic review of performance measurement systems and their relevance to social enterprises," OSF Preprints 6ft2p, Center for Open Science.
    5. Anca Antoaneta Vărzaru, 2022. "An Empirical Framework for Assessing the Balanced Scorecard Impact on Sustainable Development in Healthcare Performance Measurement," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-17, November.
    6. Jung Woo Han & Seng Kiat Kok & Robert McClelland, 2023. "The impact of green training on employee turnover intention and customer satisfaction: An integrated perspective," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(6), pages 3006-3019, November.
    7. Lorenzo Leto & Diletta Vito, 2023. "Il contributo dei sistemi di RM e PM alla sostenibilit? integrata: il caso B&C Speakers," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2023(3), pages 113-139.
    8. José Baltazar Salgueirinho Osório de Andrade Guerra & Jonas Schneider & Mauricio Andrade De Lima & Maria Gabriela M. Peixoto & Samuel Borges Barbosa & Samara da Silva Neiva & Robert Birch & Marco Anto, 2023. "Balanced scorecard and eco‐innovation in the industrial sector: A strategic map for environmental innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4266-4281, November.
    9. Raheel Yasin & Aydan Huseynova & Muhammad Atif, 2023. "Green human resource management, a gateway to employer branding: Mediating role of corporate environmental sustainability and corporate social sustainability," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 369-383, January.
    10. Kaveh Asiaei & Neale G. O'Connor & Majid Moghaddam & Nick Bontis & Jasvinder Sidhu, 2023. "Corporate social responsibility and performance measurement systems in Iran: A levers of control perspective," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 574-588, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:18:p:11723-:d:918444. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.