IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i18p11164-d908259.html

Pathways to Greener Pastures: Research Opportunities to Integrate Life Cycle Assessment and Sustainable Business Process Management Based on a Systematic Tertiary Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Andreas Fritsch

    (Institute of Applied Informatics and Formal Description Methods, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76133 Karlsruhe, Germany)

  • Johanna von Hammerstein

    (Institute of Applied Informatics and Formal Description Methods, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76133 Karlsruhe, Germany)

  • Clemens Schreiber

    (Institute of Applied Informatics and Formal Description Methods, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76133 Karlsruhe, Germany)

  • Stefanie Betz

    (Faculty of Computer Science, Furtwangen University, 78120 Furtwangen, Germany)

  • Andreas Oberweis

    (Institute of Applied Informatics and Formal Description Methods, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76133 Karlsruhe, Germany)

Abstract

Sustainable Business Process Management (BPM) is a research field that aims to improve the sustainability performance of organizations’ operations. With its focus on business processes, it has the potential to bring sustainability considerations from external reporting to the core of organizations. We present a systematic tertiary literature study to provide a catalog of existing literature reviews and primary work and to give a consolidated overview of the state and research needs of the field. We find that Sustainable BPM research has focused on modeling approaches and most of the work so far is largely conceptual, with a limited sustainability perspective. Based on these findings, we propose an integration of BPM and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), an established and rigorous method for sustainability analysis. We present research opportunities to show how both disciplines can synergize and leverage methods and techniques for business process automation and innovation to effectively improve the sustainability performance of organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Andreas Fritsch & Johanna von Hammerstein & Clemens Schreiber & Stefanie Betz & Andreas Oberweis, 2022. "Pathways to Greener Pastures: Research Opportunities to Integrate Life Cycle Assessment and Sustainable Business Process Management Based on a Systematic Tertiary Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-20, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:18:p:11164-:d:908259
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/18/11164/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/18/11164/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Rosemann & Jan Brocke, 2010. "The Six Core Elements of Business Process Management," International Handbooks on Information Systems, in: Jan vom Brocke & Michael Rosemann (ed.), Handbook on Business Process Management 1, pages 107-122, Springer.
    2. Eva Heiskanen, 2000. "Managers' interpretations of LCA: enlightenment and responsibility or confusion and denial?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(4), pages 239-254, July.
    3. Dries Couckuyt & Amy Van Looy, 2019. "Green BPM as a Business-Oriented Discipline: A Systematic Mapping Study and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-22, August.
    4. Michael Rosemann & Jan Brocke, 2015. "The Six Core Elements of Business Process Management," International Handbooks on Information Systems, in: Jan vom Brocke & Michael Rosemann (ed.), Handbook on Business Process Management 1, edition 2, pages 105-122, Springer.
    5. Paul Harmon, 2015. "The Scope and Evolution of Business Process Management," International Handbooks on Information Systems, in: Jan vom Brocke & Michael Rosemann (ed.), Handbook on Business Process Management 1, edition 2, pages 37-80, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Finn Klessascheck & Ingo Weber & Luise Pufahl, 2025. "SOPA: a framework for sustainability-oriented process analysis and re-design in business process management," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 489-537, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mahendrawathi ER & Natasha Ratna Puspita Mulyono & Ivan Althirafi Rentio & Ika Nurkasanah, 2024. "How do digital startups manage their activities? Insights and opportunities for business process management," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 557-598, September.
    2. Ralf Plattfaut, 2022. "On the Importance of Project Management Capabilities for Sustainable Business Process Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-12, June.
    3. Maha Syed Ibrahim & Aamer Hanif & Faheem Qaisar Jamal & Ali Ahsan, 2019. "Towards successful business process improvement – An extension of change acceleration process model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-20, November.
    4. Tomasz Helbin & Amy Van Looy, 2021. "Is Business Process Management (BPM) Ready for Ambidexterity? Conceptualization, Implementation Guidelines and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-25, February.
    5. Jurczuk Arkadiusz, 2021. "Barriers to implementation of business process governance mechanisms," Engineering Management in Production and Services, Sciendo, vol. 13(4), pages 22-38, December.
    6. Agnieszka Bitkowska, 2020. "The relationship between Business Process Management and Knowledge Management - selected aspects from a study of companies in Poland," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 16(1), pages 169-193.
    7. Myriam Schaschek & Fabian Gwinner & Nicolas Neis & Christoph Tomitza & Christian Zeiß & Axel Winkelmann, 2024. "Managing next generation BP-x initiatives," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 457-500, September.
    8. Laura Marcus & Sebastian Johannes Schmid & Franziska Friedrich & Maximilian Röglinger & Philipp Grindemann, 2026. "Navigating the Landscape of Organizational Process Mining Setups," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 68(1), pages 137-158, February.
    9. Wai Wong & Noor Hazlina Ahmad & Aizzat Mohd. Nasurdin & Marini Mohamad, 2014. "The impact of external environmental on business process management and organizational performance," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 8(4), pages 559-586, December.
    10. Thomas Grisold & Christian Janiesch & Maximilian Röglinger & Moe Thandar Wynn, 2024. "Managing Dynamics in and Around Business Processes," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 66(5), pages 533-540, October.
    11. Paola Lara Machado & Montijn Ven & Banu Aysolmaz & Oktay Turetken & Jan Brocke, 2024. "Navigating Business Model Redesign: The Compass Method for Identifying Changes to the Operating Model," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 66(5), pages 607-638, October.
    12. Ranđelović Aleksandra Stoiljković & Milojević Radenko & Radosavljević Marija, 2018. "Identification and Analysis of Key Business Process Management Factors," Economic Themes, Sciendo, vol. 56(1), pages 57-78, April.
    13. Martin Lehnert & Alexander Linhart & Maximilian Röglinger, 2016. "Value-based process project portfolio management: integrated planning of BPM capability development and process improvement," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 9(2), pages 377-419, August.
    14. Bastian Stahl & Björn Häckel & Daniel Leuthe & Christian Ritter, 2023. "Data or Business First?—Manufacturers’ Transformation Toward Data-driven Business Models," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 75(3), pages 303-343, September.
    15. Tobias Bender, 2024. "Towards a process selection method for embedded analytics," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 501-525, September.
    16. Tahir Ahmad & Amy Van Looy, 2020. "Business Process Management and Digital Innovations: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-30, August.
    17. Thomas Grisold & Christian Janiesch & Maximilian Röglinger & Moe Thandar Wynn, 2022. "Call for Papers, Issue 5/2024," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 64(6), pages 841-843, December.
    18. T. Bartosz Kalinowski, 2020. "Business Process Maturity Models Research: A Systematic Literature Review," International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 7(1), pages 29-35, November.
    19. Michael Rosemann & Jan vom Brocke & Amy Looy & Flavia Santoro, 2024. "Business process management in the age of AI – three essential drifts," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 415-429, September.
    20. Dries Couckuyt & Amy Van Looy, 2019. "Green BPM as a Business-Oriented Discipline: A Systematic Mapping Study and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-22, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:18:p:11164-:d:908259. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.