IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i16p9899-d885165.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Models and Methods of Formation of the Foresight-Controlling Mechanism

Author

Listed:
  • Anatoliy Alabugin

    (Department of Higher School of Economics and Management, South Ural State University, 454080 Chelyabinsk, Russia)

  • Sergei Aliukov

    (Department of Higher School of Economics and Management, South Ural State University, 454080 Chelyabinsk, Russia)

  • Tatyana Khudyakova

    (Department of Higher School of Economics and Management, South Ural State University, 454080 Chelyabinsk, Russia)

Abstract

The necessity of mechanisms for long-term forecasting and regulation of high-tech enterprise development strategies has been determined. This paper discusses how managers and designers can create models and methods for sustainability management mechanisms. The elements of novelty of this study and contribution to the existing theory of managing objects of socio-economic systems are: the development of the principle of a single mechanism of foresight-controlling, which made it possible to increase the efficiency and sustainability of the organizational behavior of objects; the development of theoretical and methodological models for the formation of a foresight-controlling management mechanism; the improvement of the management mechanism based on the combined application of mechanical and organic models of organizational behavior of socio-economic systems; the development of methods for regulating the management mechanism according to stability criteria in accordance with the characteristics of the enterprise’s innovation cycle; finally, the modernization of mathematical models and methods for studying the processes of functioning of the control mechanism. The following results of the implementation of the methods at the enterprise-object of research were obtained: the assessment and adjustment of planned and target indicators of the quality of management were carried out on the basis of an examination of the parameters of the quality of regulation; recommendations were developed for adjusting the planned and target indicators of the quality of the formation of development strategies, taking into account the factors of the knowledge economy. The results’ validations were implemented in projects and plans for the innovative development of the facility based on the transformation factors of the 5–6th modes of the economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Anatoliy Alabugin & Sergei Aliukov & Tatyana Khudyakova, 2022. "Models and Methods of Formation of the Foresight-Controlling Mechanism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-24, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:16:p:9899-:d:885165
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/16/9899/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/16/9899/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elias Carayannis & Evangelos Grigoroudis, 2016. "Quadruple Innovation Helix and Smart Specialization: Knowledge Production and National Competitiveness," Foresight-Russia Форсайт, CyberLeninka;Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики», vol. 10(1 (eng)), pages 31-42.
    2. Ron Johnston, 2011. "Future-Oriented Technology Analysis: The Cassandra Challenge," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 5(2), pages 58-64.
    3. Hendrik Reefke & Mattia Trocchi, 2013. "Balanced scorecard for sustainable supply chains: design and development guidelines," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 62(8), pages 805-826, October.
    4. Elias Carayannis & Evangelos Grigoroudis, 2016. "Quadruple Innovation Helix and Smart Specialization: Knowledge Production and National Competitiveness," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 10(1), pages 31-42.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anatoliy Alabugin & Konstantin Osintsev & Sergei Aliukov & Zlata Almetova & Yaroslav Bolkov, 2023. "Mathematical Foundations for Modeling a Zero-Carbon Electric Power System in Terms of Sustainability," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-24, May.
    2. Anatoliy Alabugin & Sergei Aliukov & Tatyana Khudyakova, 2022. "Review of Models for and Socioeconomic Approaches to the Formation of Foresight Control Mechanisms: A Genesis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, September.
    3. Sergei Aliukov & Anatoliy Alabugin & Konstantin Osintsev, 2022. "Review of Methods, Applications and Publications on the Approximation of Piecewise Linear and Generalized Functions," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(16), pages 1-43, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bartoloni, Sara & Calò, Ernesto & Marinelli, Luca & Pascucci, Federica & Dezi, Luca & Carayannis, Elias & Revel, Gian Marco & Gregori, Gian Luca, 2022. "Towards designing society 5.0 solutions: The new Quintuple Helix - Design Thinking approach to technology," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    2. Eva Panetti & Adele Parmentola & Marco Ferretti & Elisabeth Beck Reynolds, 2020. "Exploring the relational dimension in a smart innovation ecosystem: a comprehensive framework to define the network structure and the network portfolio," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(6), pages 1775-1796, December.
    3. Yong Kyu Lew & Jeong‐Yang Park, 2021. "The evolution of N‐helix of the regional innovation system: Implications for sustainability," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(2), pages 453-464, March.
    4. Taneli Heikka & Elias G. Carayannis, 2019. "Three Stages of Innovation in Participatory Journalism—Co-initiating, Co-sensing, and Co-creating News in the Chicago School Cuts Case," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 10(2), pages 437-464, June.
    5. Tatyana Tolstykh & Leyla Gamidullaeva & Nadezhda Shmeleva, 2021. "Universities as Knowledge Integrators and Cross-Industry Ecosystems: Self-Organizational Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440209, February.
    6. Daminda Sumanapala & Isabelle D. Wolf, 2022. "Introducing Geotourism to Diversify the Visitor Experience in Protected Areas and Reduce Impacts on Overused Attractions," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-15, November.
    7. Živilé Gedminaité-Raudoné & Dalia Vidickiené & Rita Vilké, 2019. "Unused potential for Smart Specialization development through collaboration: Lithuanian case," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 65(10), pages 463-469.
    8. Francesco Polese & Carmen Gallucci & Luca Carrubbo & Rosalia Santulli, 2021. "Predictive Maintenance as a Driver for Corporate Sustainability: Evidence from a Public-Private Co-Financed R&D Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, May.
    9. Sanja Franc & Deniza Karadžija, 2019. "Quintuple helix approach: The case of the European Union," Notitia - journal for economic, business and social issues, Notitia Ltd., vol. 1(5), pages 91-100, December.
    10. Olena Kolomytseva & Anna Pavlovska, 2020. "The Role Of Universities In The National Innovation System," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 6(1).
    11. Mona Roman & Henry Varga & Vladimir Cvijanovic & Alasdair Reid, 2020. "Quadruple Helix Models for Sustainable Regional Innovation: Engaging and Facilitating Civil Society Participation," Economies, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-15, June.
    12. Morshed Alam & Harshita Aini Haroon & Mohd Faizal bin Yusof & Md. Aminul Islam, 2023. "Framework for Undergraduate Entrepreneurship Education in Australia: Preliminary Exploration," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, May.
    13. Alberto Bettanti & Antonella Lanati & Alessandro Missoni, 2022. "Biopharmaceutical innovation ecosystems: a stakeholder model and the case of Lombardy," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(6), pages 1948-1973, December.
    14. Kirill V. Simonov & Natalia A. Girfanova, 2023. "Managing a high-tech startup: A case of machine vision for the poultry industry," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 14(2), pages 47-61, May.
    15. Joanna Morawska-Jancelewicz, 2022. "The Role of Universities in Social Innovation Within Quadruple/Quintuple Helix Model: Practical Implications from Polish Experience," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(3), pages 2230-2271, September.
    16. Roman, Mona & Fellnhofer, Katharina, 2022. "Facilitating the participation of civil society in regional planning: Implementing quadruple helix model in Finnish regions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    17. Olga V. Zabelina & Maria V. Sergeeva, 2022. "Inclusive economic growth through employment and income: Experience of the Russian Federation," Journal of Applied Economic Research, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 21(1), pages 21-48.
    18. Zoltán Birkner & Ádám Mészáros & István Szabó, 2021. "Lessons Learnt: Changes in the Methodology of the Entrepreneurial Discovery Process in Defining the Priorities of Hungarian Smart Specialisation Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-18, November.
    19. Alfonso Unceta & Xabier Barandiaran & Asier Lakidain, 2021. "Digitalisation of Creative Industries Fostered by Collaborative Governance: Public Innovation Labs in Gipuzkoa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-20, February.
    20. S. I. Kravchenko, 2022. "Identification Of The National Innovation System In A Globalized Environment," Strategic decisions and risk management, Real Economy Publishing House, vol. 12(4).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:16:p:9899-:d:885165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.