IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i13p8110-d854681.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implication of Mutual Assistance Evacuation Model to Reduce the Volcanic Risk for Vulnerable Society: Insight from Mount Merapi, Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Faizul Chasanah

    (Graduate School of Sciences and Technology for Innovation, Yamaguchi University, Ube City 755-8611, Japan
    Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Planning, Islamic University of Indonesia, Sleman, Yogyakarta 55584, Indonesia)

  • Hiroyuki Sakakibara

    (Graduate School of Sciences and Technology for Innovation, Yamaguchi University, Ube City 755-8611, Japan)

Abstract

The successful evacuation of vulnerable people during emergencies is a significant challenge. In the case of a Mount Merapi eruption, limited private vehicles in the community and a lack of evacuation transport and government volunteers led some people to walk to the meeting area. Consequently, low walking speeds by vulnerable persons may increase the risk and delay. Therefore, the mutual assistance strategy is proposed to support vulnerable people by evacuating them with young people. This grouping was simulated using an AnyLogic software with the agent-based model concept. Pedestrians and vehicles played the roles of significant agents in this experiment. Evacuation departure rate, actual walking speed, group size, route, and coordination were crucial agent parameters. Human behavior and agent distribution were investigated using stakeholders and local community interviews. We measured the walking speed directly to find the independent and group speed. Afterward, we developed three scenarios and models for the evacuation process. A traffic approach was used in the simulation. The results revealed that this mutual assistance model is effective for the rapid evacuation and risk reduction of vulnerable communities where successful evacuation rates have improved. The highest arrival rating was obtained by the Model 3, which was assembled and well-coordinated from home. These findings are a novelty in the volcano context and reflect all categories of vulnerable behavior involving the elderly, disabled, children, and pregnant mothers. The model will benefit disaster management studies and authorities’ policies for sustainable evacuation planning and aging population mitigation.

Suggested Citation

  • Faizul Chasanah & Hiroyuki Sakakibara, 2022. "Implication of Mutual Assistance Evacuation Model to Reduce the Volcanic Risk for Vulnerable Society: Insight from Mount Merapi, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-23, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:8110-:d:854681
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/8110/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/8110/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J Jumadi & Nick Malleson & Steve Carver & Duncan Quincey, 2020. "Estimating Spatio-Temporal Risks from Volcanic Eruptions Using an Agent-Based Model," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 23(2), pages 1-2.
    2. Yaping Ma & Xiaoying Liu & Feizhou Huo & Hui Li, 2022. "Analysis of Cooperation Behaviors and Crowd Dynamics during Pedestrian Evacuation with Group Existence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, April.
    3. Annetta Burger & Talha Oz & William G. Kennedy & Andrew T. Crooks, 2019. "Computational Social Science of Disasters: Opportunities and Challenges," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-31, April.
    4. Liu, Qiujia & Lu, Linjun & Zhang, Yijing & Hu, Miaoqing, 2022. "Modeling the dynamics of pedestrian evacuation in a complex environment," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 585(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xianing Wang & Zhan Zhang & Ying Wang & Jun Yang & Linjun Lu, 2022. "A Study on Safety Evaluation of Pedestrian Flows Based on Partial Impact Dynamics by Real-Time Data in Subway Stations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-19, August.
    2. Jiaying Qin & Sasa Ma & Lei Zhang & Qianling Wang & Guoce Feng, 2022. "Modeling and Simulation for Non-Motorized Vehicle Flow on Road Based on Modified Social Force Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Zhang, Yijing & Lu, Linjun & Liu, Qiujia & Hu, Miaoqing, 2023. "Modeling of low-risk behavior of pedestrian movement based on dynamic data analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    4. Xuehua Han & Liang Wang & Dandan Xu & He Wei & Xinghua Zhang & Xiaodong Zhang, 2022. "Research Progress and Framework Construction of Urban Resilience Computational Simulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-15, September.
    5. Yuan, Shuaiqi & Cai, Jitao & Reniers, Genserik & Yang, Ming & Chen, Chao & Wu, Jiansong, 2022. "Safety barrier performance assessment by integrating computational fluid dynamics and evacuation modeling for toxic gas leakage scenarios," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    6. Camillo Donati & Andrea Guazzini & Giorgio Gronchi & Andrea Smorti, 2019. "About Linda Again: How Narratives and Group Reasoning Can Influence Conjunction Fallacy," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-14, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:8110-:d:854681. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.