IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i13p7864-d850306.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Application of Axiomatic Design to Improve Productivity in the Circular Economy Context—The Salt Production Example

Author

Listed:
  • António Gabriel-Santos

    (R&D Unit for Mechanical and Industrial Engineering—UNIDEMI, NOVA School of Science and Technology, Campus de Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
    Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering—DEMI, NOVA School of Science and Technology, Campus de Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
    Mano—Equipamentos de Movimentação e Automação, S.A., Rua D. Luís de Noronha, 2635-380 Rio de Mouro, Portugal)

  • João Fradinho

    (R&D Unit for Mechanical and Industrial Engineering—UNIDEMI, NOVA School of Science and Technology, Campus de Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
    Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering—DEMI, NOVA School of Science and Technology, Campus de Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal)

  • António Mourão

    (R&D Unit for Mechanical and Industrial Engineering—UNIDEMI, NOVA School of Science and Technology, Campus de Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
    Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering—DEMI, NOVA School of Science and Technology, Campus de Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal)

  • Alberto Martinho

    (R&D Unit for Mechanical and Industrial Engineering—UNIDEMI, NOVA School of Science and Technology, Campus de Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
    Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering—DEMI, NOVA School of Science and Technology, Campus de Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal)

  • Miguel Cavique

    (R&D Unit for Mechanical and Industrial Engineering—UNIDEMI, NOVA School of Science and Technology, Campus de Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
    Naval Academy, Base Naval de Lisboa, Alfeite, 2810-001 Almada, Portugal)

  • Gonçalo Vieira

    (Mano—Equipamentos de Movimentação e Automação, S.A., Rua D. Luís de Noronha, 2635-380 Rio de Mouro, Portugal)

  • António Gonçalves-Coelho

    (R&D Unit for Mechanical and Industrial Engineering—UNIDEMI, NOVA School of Science and Technology, Campus de Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
    Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering—DEMI, NOVA School of Science and Technology, Campus de Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal)

Abstract

Sustainability and a circular economy (CE) are crucial for the development of society. The CE approach should start by designing new products or processes or retrofitting existing ones to achieve the best efficiency and extend their life cycle. Designs that enable CE require the guidance of a design theory. Axiomatic design (AD) theory allows for the classification of designs and achieving the targets if appropriate requirements are adopted. This paper aimed to show that sustainability and productivity can be made compatible by ensuring functional independence, as defined in AD and using the circular economy concept. The paper presents how a salt washing machine could be improved concerning its performance. The analysis of the existing design showed fewer design parameters than the functional requirements. A viable enhancement was the addition of one design parameter, which made it possible to control the separation and washing independently. The resulting machine retrofitting increased the production rate by 20% to 30%—the productivity and the quality of the final product was also improved. The washing process now used less water and energy. Moreover, the brine feeding system was also redesigned, so that the brine was now reused, the land use was reduced as was the operating time, and the operators now worked in a more friendly environment. The industrial case study presented in this paper is an example of how innovative engineering design that fits the design science research (DSR) with the generation of knowledge. The objective of this design solution was to increase the efficiency of the entire process and consequently increase the productivity and sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • António Gabriel-Santos & João Fradinho & António Mourão & Alberto Martinho & Miguel Cavique & Gonçalo Vieira & António Gonçalves-Coelho, 2022. "An Application of Axiomatic Design to Improve Productivity in the Circular Economy Context—The Salt Production Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-16, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:7864-:d:850306
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/7864/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/7864/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jan vom Brocke & Alan Hevner & Alexander Maedche, 2020. "Introduction to Design Science Research," Progress in IS, in: Jan vom Brocke & Alan Hevner & Alexander Maedche (ed.), Design Science Research. Cases, pages 1-13, Springer.
    2. Herbert A. Simon, 1996. "The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd Edition," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262691914, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tobias Knabke & Sebastian Olbrich, 2018. "Building novel capabilities to enable business intelligence agility: results from a quantitative study," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 493-546, August.
    2. Sunder Shyam, 2011. "Imagined Worlds of Accounting," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 1(1), pages 1-14, January.
    3. McCown, R. L., 2002. "Changing systems for supporting farmers' decisions: problems, paradigms, and prospects," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 74(1), pages 179-220, October.
    4. Basile, Luigi Jesus & Carbonara, Nunzia & Pellegrino, Roberta & Panniello, Umberto, 2023. "Business intelligence in the healthcare industry: The utilization of a data-driven approach to support clinical decision making," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    5. Loris Gaio, 2005. "A diversity-based approach to requirements tracing in new product development," ROCK Working Papers 031, Department of Computer and Management Sciences, University of Trento, Italy, revised 13 Jun 2008.
    6. B. A. Huberman & N. S. Glance, "undated". "Diversity and Collective Action," Working Papers _001, Xerox Research Park.
    7. Zhewei Zhang & Youngjin Yoo & Kalle Lyytinen & Aron Lindberg, 2021. "The Unknowability of Autonomous Tools and the Liminal Experience of Their Use," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 1192-1213, December.
    8. David Stadelmann & Benno Torgler, 2012. "Bounded Rationality and Voting Decisions Exploring a 160-Year Period," Working Papers 2012.70, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    9. Francis Marleau Donais & Irène Abi-Zeid & E. Owen D. Waygood & Roxane Lavoie, 2021. "A Framework for Post-Project Evaluation of Multicriteria Decision Aiding Processes from the Stakeholders’ Perspective: Design and Application," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 30(5), pages 1161-1191, October.
    10. H. Christopher Frey & Sumeet R. Patil, 2002. "Identification and Review of Sensitivity Analysis Methods," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(3), pages 553-578, June.
    11. Marie-Laure Salles-Djelic & Michel Gutsatz, 2000. "Managerial Competencies for Organizational Flexibility: The Luxury Goods Industry between Tradition and Postmodernism," Post-Print hal-01892018, HAL.
    12. Rennard, Jean-Philippe, 2006. "Artificiality in Social Sciences," MPRA Paper 1458, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Luoma, Jukka, 2016. "Model-based organizational decision making: A behavioral lens," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(3), pages 816-826.
    14. Dalila Cisco Collatto & Aline Dresch & Daniel Pacheco Lacerda & Ione Ghislene Bentz, 2018. "Is Action Design Research Indeed Necessary? Analysis and Synergies Between Action Research and Design Science Research," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 239-267, June.
    15. Nadia Fiorino & Emma Galli & Ilde Rizzo & Marco Valente, 2023. "Public procurement and reputation. An agent‐based model," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(4), pages 806-832, November.
    16. Olivier L. de Weck & Marshall B. Jones, 2006. "Isoperformance: Analysis and design of complex systems with desired outcomes," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(1), pages 45-61, March.
    17. Hippel, Eric von., 1992. "Adapting market research to the rapid evolution of needs for new products and services," Working papers 3374-92., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    18. Konstantinos S. Boulas & Georgios D. Dounias & Chrissoleon T. Papadopoulos, 2023. "A hybrid evolutionary algorithm approach for estimating the throughput of short reliable approximately balanced production lines," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 823-852, February.
    19. Erik Karger & Marvin Jagals & Frederik Ahlemann, 2021. "Blockchain for Smart Mobility—Literature Review and Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-32, November.
    20. Richard Fellows & Anita M.M. Liu, 2012. "Managing organizational interfaces in engineering construction projects: addressing fragmentation and boundary issues across multiple interfaces," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(8), pages 653-671, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:7864-:d:850306. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.