IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i13p7579-d844523.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Wheat Production in Drought-Prone Agro-Ecologies in Ethiopia: Diagnostic Assessment of Farmers’ Practices and Sustainable Coping Mechanisms and the Role of Improved Cultivars

Author

Listed:
  • Yared Belete

    (African Centre for Crop Improvement, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X01, Pietermaritzburg 3209, South Africa
    Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Addis Ababa P.O. Box 2003, Ethiopia)

  • Hussein Shimelis

    (African Centre for Crop Improvement, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X01, Pietermaritzburg 3209, South Africa)

  • Mark Laing

    (African Centre for Crop Improvement, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X01, Pietermaritzburg 3209, South Africa)

Abstract

Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) is traditionally cultivated under drought-affected and low-input agro-ecologies in sub-Saharan Africa, including Ethiopia. Wheat productivity in these agro-systems is considerably low (<2.4 t/ha) due to climate change-induced drought and heat stress, a lack of modern production technologies, including climate-smart varieties, and an array of biotic and abiotic factors. The objective of this study was to determine the potential of wheat production in drought-prone agro-ecologies and to assess farmers’ practices and sustainable coping mechanisms and the role of improved cultivars in Ethiopia. A participatory rural appraisal (PRA) study was conducted involving 170 randomly selected wheat farmers in the drier areas of Arsi Zone of the Oromia Regional State. Results showed that wheat and tef ( Eragrostis tef Zucc.) and barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) were the most widely grown cereal crops in the study areas as the primary food source and cash income. Yield losses varying from 63.1 to 73.8% were reported by farmers due to drought stress occurring mainly during grain filling stage. The majority of the respondent farmers (>50%) planted wheat in early July using the broadcasting method. Their land was of medium fertility, and the application of inorganic fertilizer was suboptimal. Due to crop failures by intense drought conditions in the study areas, above 50% of the respondent farmers had not expressed coping strategies against drought stress except resorting to government food aid. However, about 22% of the respondent farmers reported improved agronomic practices, such as the cultivation of early maturing wheat varieties and soil and water conservation methods as sustainable solutions to mitigate against drought. Therefore, current and future wheat breeding in Ethiopia should target drought and heat stress tolerance and adaptive crop traits as ideal coping strategies under low input agriculture systems for sustainable wheat production and productivity.

Suggested Citation

  • Yared Belete & Hussein Shimelis & Mark Laing, 2022. "Wheat Production in Drought-Prone Agro-Ecologies in Ethiopia: Diagnostic Assessment of Farmers’ Practices and Sustainable Coping Mechanisms and the Role of Improved Cultivars," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-10, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:7579-:d:844523
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/7579/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/7579/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Asfaw, Solomon & Shiferaw, Bekele & Simtowe, Franklin & Lipper, Leslie, 2012. "Impact of modern agricultural technologies on smallholder welfare: Evidence from Tanzania and Ethiopia," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 283-295.
    2. Shiferaw, Bekele & Kassie, Menale & Jaleta, Moti & Yirga, Chilot, 2014. "Adoption of improved wheat varieties and impacts on household food security in Ethiopia," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 272-284.
    3. Gebreselassie, Samuel & Haile, Mekbib G. & Kalkuhl, Matthias, "undated". "The Wheat Sector in Ethiopia: Current Status and Key Challenges for Future Value Chain Development," Working Papers 261290, University of Bonn, Center for Development Research (ZEF).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sita Kone & Aminata Balde & Pam Zahonogo & Safietou Sanfo, 2024. "A systematic review of recent estimations of climate change impact on agriculture and adaptation strategies perspectives in Africa," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 1-26, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bairagi, Subir & Bhandari, Humnath & Kumar Das, Subrata & Mohanty, Samarendu, 2021. "Flood-tolerant rice improves climate resilience, profitability, and household consumption in Bangladesh," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    2. Bairagi, Subir K. & Bhandari, Humnath & Das, Subrata & Mohanty, Samarendu, "undated". "Impact of Submergence-Tolerant Rice Varieties on Smallholders’ Income and Expenditure: Farm-Level Evidence from Bangladesh," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274356, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    3. Do Nascimento Miguel, Jérémy, 2024. "Returns to quality in rural agricultural markets: Evidence from wheat markets in Ethiopia," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    4. Gideon Danso-Abbeam & Lloyd J. S. Baiyegunhi & Mark D. Laing & Hussein Shimelis, 2022. "Productivity and Welfare Impacts of Dual-Purpose Sweetpotato Varieties’ Adoption Among Smallholder Farmers in Rwanda," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 34(2), pages 1097-1117, April.
    5. Khonje, Makaiko & Mkandawire, Petros & Manda, Julius & Alene, Arega, 2015. "Analysis of adoption and impacts of improved cassava varieties," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 211842, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. Bairagi, Subir & Mishra, Ashok K. & Durand-Morat, Alvaro, 2020. "Climate risk management strategies and food security: Evidence from Cambodian rice farmers," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    7. Hörner, Denise & Wollni, Meike, 2021. "Integrated soil fertility management and household welfare in Ethiopia," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    8. Mekonnen, Dawit & Abate, Gashaw & Yimam, Seid, 2021. "Irrigation and Agricultural Transformation in Ethiopia," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315339, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Tilahun Woldie Mengistu & Saurabh Gupta & Regina Birner, 2018. "Analysis of maize biomass use in Ethiopia and its implications for food security and the bioeconomy," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 10(6), pages 1631-1648, December.
    10. Emiliano Magrini & Mauro Vigani, 2016. "Technology adoption and the multiple dimensions of food security: the case of maize in Tanzania," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 8(4), pages 707-726, August.
    11. B.W., Muriithi & K., Menale & G., Diiro & M.O., Nyanganga & D., Masiga, 2021. "Micro-Economic Impact of Tsetse and Trypanosomiasis Control Interventions on Farmers’ Livelihoods in Kwale County, Kenya," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315235, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    12. Abebayehu Girma Geffersa & Frank W. Agbola & Amir Mahmood, 2022. "Improved maize adoption and impacts on farm household welfare: Evidence from rural Ethiopia," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 66(4), pages 860-886, October.
    13. Garbero, A. & Marion, P., 2018. "IFAD RESEARCH SERIES 28 - Understanding the dynamics of adoption decisions and their poverty impacts: the case of improved maize seeds in Uganda," IFAD Research Series 280077, International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD).
    14. Moti Jaleta & Menale Kassie & Paswel Marenya & Chilot Yirga & Olaf Erenstein, 2018. "Impact of improved maize adoption on household food security of maize producing smallholder farmers in Ethiopia," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 10(1), pages 81-93, February.
    15. Beatrice W. Muriithi & Kassie Menale & Gracious M. Diiro & Michael N. Okal & Daniel K. Masiga, 2023. "Correction to: Effect of use of tsetse repellant collar technology on the farm performance and household welfare of small‑scale livestock farmers in Kenya," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 15(3), pages 771-771, June.
    16. Wainaina, Priscilla & Tongruksawattana, Songporne & Qaim, Matin, 2016. "Synergies between different types of agricultural technologies: insights from the Kenyan small farm sector," 2016 Fifth International Conference, September 23-26, 2016, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 246380, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
    17. Musa Hasen Ahmed & Hiwot Mekonnen Mesfin, 2017. "The impact of agricultural cooperatives membership on the wellbeing of smallholder farmers: empirical evidence from eastern Ethiopia," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 5(1), pages 1-20, December.
    18. Aseres Mamo Eshetie & Eunice Matafwali & Gershom Endelani Mwalupaso & Jie Li & Aijun Liu, 2022. "Nexus of Cash Crop Production Using Improved Varieties and Household Food Security," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 34(4), pages 1803-1830, August.
    19. Cao, Yangzhe & Swallow, Brent & Qiu, Feng, 2021. "Identifying the effects of a land-use policy on willingness to pay for open space using an endogenous switching regression model," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    20. Varshney, Deepak & Mishra, Ashok K. & Joshi, Pramod K. & Roy, Devesh, 2022. "Social networks, heterogeneity, and adoption of technologies: Evidence from India," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:7579-:d:844523. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.