IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i11p6898-d832131.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Uncovering Barriers for Industrial Symbiosis: Assessing Prospects for Eco-Industrialization through Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Developing Regions

Author

Listed:
  • Nadia Akhtar

    (Department of Environmental Science, International Islamic University, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan)

  • Syed Atif Bokhari

    (Department of Geography, Government Graduate College, Asghar Mall, Rawalpindi 46000, Pakistan)

  • Michael Alan Martin

    (IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute, Life Cycle Management, Sustainable Society, 11428 Stockholm, Sweden
    Department of Sustainable Development, Environmental Science and Engineering, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 11428 Stockholm, Sweden)

  • Zafeer Saqib

    (Department of Environmental Science, International Islamic University, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan)

  • Muhammad Irfan Khan

    (Department of Environmental Science, International Islamic University, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan)

  • Arif Mahmud

    (Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, National University of Medical Sciences, Rawalpindi 46000, Pakistan)

  • Muhammad Zaman-ul-Haq

    (Department of Environmental Science, International Islamic University, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan)

  • Sarah Amir

    (Department of Environmental Science, International Islamic University, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan)

Abstract

Industrialization is indispensable for socio-economic development but poses far-reaching implications for resources and the environment. Consequently, industrial symbiosis-based collaborations are gaining recognition as a viable strategy to manage resource consumption for mitigating environmental distress. However, these types of synergistic collaborations are more prevalent in developed regions and are linked to larger-sized industries. Admittedly, such collaborative partnerships are less focused in developing regions and small- to medium-size enterprises (SMEs). This calls for discovering the potentials for synergistic partnerships among the small and medium scaled industrial entities in developing economies. Therefore, the study was designed to identify, assess and explore the prospects of symbiotic collaborations among SMEs in Pakistan. Moreover, the inputs are equally relevant for developing and expanding such productive associations in developing regions. Data regarding inputs and outputs was collected from sixty-one (61) SMEs through field survey during the year 2019. It was processed and analyzed to uncover existing and potential synergies among SMEs. The significant findings transpired that the majority of collaborative linkages are bilateral and are driven to maximize economic gains. However, informal networks of recyclers and absence of a stringent regulatory regime are the ground realities in developing/transforming economies. These factors symptomatically interfere with the process of formal/informal exchanges between and among firms. Furthermore, it was observed that the lack of awareness and impulsiveness of SMEs, as well as the inconsistent supply of by-products, act as barriers for such partnerships in developing countries. It calls for proactive engagements and facilitations from the state institutions through policy instruments. The study addresses a broad audience including industrialists, investors, policy makers and researchers engaged in IS studies. Moreover, the inputs will provide impetus for stimulating eco-industrial progress in developing regions such as Pakistan.

Suggested Citation

  • Nadia Akhtar & Syed Atif Bokhari & Michael Alan Martin & Zafeer Saqib & Muhammad Irfan Khan & Arif Mahmud & Muhammad Zaman-ul-Haq & Sarah Amir, 2022. "Uncovering Barriers for Industrial Symbiosis: Assessing Prospects for Eco-Industrialization through Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Developing Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-21, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:11:p:6898-:d:832131
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/11/6898/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/11/6898/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Muhammad Zaman-ul-Haq & Zafeer Saqib & Ambrina Kanwal & Salman Naseer & Muhammad Shafiq & Nadia Akhtar & Syed Atif Bokhari & Azeem Irshad & Habib Hamam, 2022. "The Trajectories, Trends, and Opportunities for Assessing Urban Ecosystem Services: A Systematic Review of Geospatial Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-22, January.
    2. Qinghua ZHU & Ernest A. LOWE & Yuan‐an WEI & Donald BARNES, 2007. "Industrial Symbiosis in China: A Case Study of the Guitang Group," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 11(1), pages 31-42, January.
    3. Lucija Ažman Momirski & Barbara Mušič & Boštjan Cotič, 2021. "Urban Strategies Enabling Industrial and Urban Symbiosis: The Case of Slovenia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Júlia Wahrlich & Flávio José Simioni, 2019. "Industrial symbiosis in the forestry sector: A case study in southern Brazil," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 23(6), pages 1470-1482, December.
    5. Mary Griffin & Jeffery Sobal & Thomas Lyson, 2009. "An analysis of a community food waste stream," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 26(1), pages 67-81, March.
    6. Jensen, Paul D., 2016. "The role of geospatial industrial diversity in the facilitation of regional industrial symbiosis," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 92-103.
    7. Marian R. Chertow, 2007. "“Uncovering” Industrial Symbiosis," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 11(1), pages 11-30, January.
    8. Zhiquan Yeo & Donato Masi & Jonathan Sze Choong Low & Yen Ting Ng & Puay Siew Tan & Stuart Barnes, 2019. "Tools for promoting industrial symbiosis: A systematic review," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 23(5), pages 1087-1108, October.
    9. Angela Neves & Radu Godina & Susana G. Azevedo & Carina Pimentel & João C.O. Matias, 2019. "The Potential of Industrial Symbiosis: Case Analysis and Main Drivers and Barriers to Its Implementation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-68, December.
    10. Judy Kincaid & Michael Overcash, 2001. "Industrial Ecosystem Development at the Metropolitan Level," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 5(1), pages 117-126, January.
    11. John Ehrenfeld & Nicholas Gertler, 1997. "Industrial Ecology in Practice: The Evolution of Interdependence at Kalundborg," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 1(1), pages 67-79, January.
    12. Ammad Zafar & Sadaf Mustafa, 2017. "SMEs and its Role in Economic and Socio-Economic Development of Pakistan," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 7(4), pages 195-205, October.
    13. Debby F. Mir, 2008. "Environmental behaviour in Chicago automotive repair micro‐enterprises (MEPs)," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 17(3), pages 194-207, March.
    14. Syed Atif Bokhari & Zafeer Saqib & Sarah Amir & Salman Naseer & Muhammad Shafiq & Amjad Ali & Muhammad Zaman-ul-Haq & Azeem Irshad & Habib Hamam, 2022. "Assessing Land Cover Transformation for Urban Environmental Sustainability through Satellite Sensing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-19, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Said Yousef Dwikat & Darwina Arshad & Mohd Noor Mohd Shariff, 2023. "Effect of Competent Human Capital, Strategic Flexibility and Turbulent Environment on Sustainable Performance of SMEs in Manufacturing Industries in Palestine," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-29, March.
    2. Syed Mithun Ali & Andrea Appolloni & Fausto Cavallaro & Idiano D’Adamo & Assunta Di Vaio & Francesco Ferella & Massimo Gastaldi & Muhammad Ikram & Nallapaneni Manoj Kumar & Michael Alan Martin & Abdul, 2023. "Development Goals towards Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-11, June.
    3. Said Yousef Dwikat & Darwina Arshad & Mohd Noor Mohd Shariff, 2022. "The Influence of Systematic Strategic Planning and Strategic Business Innovation on the Sustainable Performance of Manufacturing SMEs: The Case of Palestine," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-26, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tian Yang & Changhao Liu & Raymond P. Côté & Jinwen Ye & Weifeng Liu, 2022. "Evaluating the Barriers to Industrial Symbiosis Using a Group AHP-TOPSIS Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-30, June.
    2. João Azevedo & Juan Henriques & Marco Estrela & Rui Dias & Doroteya Vladimirova & Karen Miller & Muriel Iten, 2021. "Guidelines for Industrial Symbiosis—a Systematic Approach for Content Definition and Practical Recommendations for Implementation," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.
    3. Emilia Faria & Cristiane Barreto & Armando Caldeira-Pires & Jorge Alfredo Cerqueira Streit & Patricia Guarnieri, 2023. "Brazilian Circular Economy Pilot Project: Integrating Local Stakeholders’ Perception and Social Context in Industrial Symbiosis Analyses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-28, February.
    4. Efrain Boom-Cárcamo & Rita Peñabaena-Niebles, 2022. "Analysis of the Development of Industrial Symbiosis in Emerging and Frontier Market Countries: Barriers and Drivers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-32, April.
    5. Miguel A. Artacho-Ramírez & Bélgica Pacheco-Blanco & Víctor A. Cloquell-Ballester & Mónica Vicent & Irina Celades, 2020. "Quick Wins Workshop and Companies Profiling to Analyze Industrial Symbiosis Potential. Valenciaport’s Cluster as Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-21, September.
    6. Rui Dias & João Azevedo & Inês Ferreira & Marco Estrela & Juan Henriques & Cristina Ascenço & Muriel Iten, 2020. "Technical Viability Analysis of Industrial Synergies—An Applied Framework Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-15, September.
    7. Marian R. Chertow & Koichi S. Kanaoka & Jooyoung Park, 2021. "Tracking the diffusion of industrial symbiosis scholarship using bibliometrics: Comparing across Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(4), pages 913-931, August.
    8. Yuxi Dai & Steven Day & Donato Masi & Ismail Gölgeci, 2022. "A synthesised framework of eco‐industrial park transformation and stakeholder interaction," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3122-3151, November.
    9. Lucija Ažman Momirski & Barbara Mušič & Boštjan Cotič, 2021. "Urban Strategies Enabling Industrial and Urban Symbiosis: The Case of Slovenia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, April.
    10. Juan Henriques & Paulo Ferrão & Rui Castro & João Azevedo, 2021. "Industrial Symbiosis: A Sectoral Analysis on Enablers and Barriers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, February.
    11. Xin Nie & Jianxian Wu & Han Wang & Weijuan Li & Chengdao Huang & Lihua Li, 2022. "Contributing to carbon peak: Estimating the causal impact of eco‐industrial parks on low‐carbon development in China," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(4), pages 1578-1593, August.
    12. Chembessi Chedrak & Gohoungodji Paulin & Juste Rajaonson, 2023. "“A fine wine, better with age”: Circular economy historical roots and influential publications: A bibliometric analysis using Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy (RPYS)," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(6), pages 1593-1612, December.
    13. Taskhiri, Mohammad Sadegh & Tan, Raymond R. & Chiu, Anthony S.F., 2011. "Emergy-based fuzzy optimization approach for water reuse in an eco-industrial park," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 55(7), pages 730-737.
    14. Dong, Liang & Liang, Hanwei & Zhang, Liguo & Liu, Zhaowen & Gao, Zhiqiu & Hu, Mingming, 2017. "Highlighting regional eco-industrial development: Life cycle benefits of an urban industrial symbiosis and implications in China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 361(C), pages 164-176.
    15. J. Rincón-Moreno & M. Ormazábal & C. Jaca, 2022. "Stakeholder Perspectives in Transitioning to a Local Circular Economy: a Case Study in Spain," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.
    16. Luca Fraccascia & Ilaria Giannoccaro & Vito Albino, 2017. "Efficacy of Landfill Tax and Subsidy Policies for the Emergence of Industrial Symbiosis Networks: An Agent-Based Simulation Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-18, March.
    17. Juan Diego Henriques & João Azevedo & Rui Dias & Marco Estrela & Cristina Ascenço & Doroteya Vladimirova & Karen Miller, 2022. "Implementing Industrial Symbiosis Incentives: an Applied Assessment Framework for Risk Mitigation," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.
    18. Yang Liu & Peng Cheng & Li Hu, 2022. "How do justice and top management beliefs matter in industrial symbiosis collaboration: An exploratory study from China," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(3), pages 891-906, June.
    19. João Azevedo & Inês Ferreira & Rui Dias & Cristina Ascenço & Bruno Magalhães & Juan Henriques & Muriel Iten & Fernando Cunha, 2021. "Industrial Symbiosis Implementation Potential—An Applied Assessment Tool for Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-16, January.
    20. Zhe Liu & Weslynne S. Ashton & Michelle Adams & Qing Wang & Raymond P. Cote & Tony R. Walker & Lu Sun & Peter Lowitt, 2023. "Diversity in financing and implementation pathways for industrial symbiosis across the globe," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 960-978, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:11:p:6898-:d:832131. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.