IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2021i1p94-d708902.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Willingness to Pay for Irrigation Services in the Cold Winter Deserts of Uzbekistan

Author

Listed:
  • Girma T. Kassie

    (Social, Economics, and Policy Research Team, International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), Rabat B.P. 6299-10112, Morocco)

  • Hasan Boboev

    (Restoration Initiative on Dryland Ecosystems, International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), Tashkent 100084, Uzbekistan)

  • Ram Sharma

    (Restoration Initiative on Dryland Ecosystems, International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), Tashkent 100084, Uzbekistan)

  • Akmal Akramkhanov

    (Resilient Agrosilvopastoral Systems Team, International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), Tashkent 100084, Uzbekistan)

Abstract

Irrigation facilities in the cold winter deserts (CWDs) of Uzbekistan are very traditional and poorly managed, resulting in low water use efficiency and low productivity. Improving the irrigation facilities in these deserts is a key priority for the country. This study intended to contribute towards the development of the irrigation systems through identification and quantification of the relative implicit values smallholder farmers confer to the key characteristics of irrigation facilities. We elicited preferences with discrete choice experiments, estimated willingness to pay for these attributes using random parameters logit models, and analyzed heuristics in the choice process using a series of latent class models. Our results show that farmers have clear preferences for higher watering frequency and no interest in sharing irrigation water with downstream users. We also observed that there are distinct groups of farmers with comparable but different levels of preference. The development of irrigation facilities in the water-scarce parts of Uzbekistan would benefit from careful consideration of the preferences of the target communities and targeting of the schemes based on the broad heterogeneities within the communities. This will aid in the maintenance of irrigation systems and, as a result, increase agricultural production and productivity.

Suggested Citation

  • Girma T. Kassie & Hasan Boboev & Ram Sharma & Akmal Akramkhanov, 2021. "Willingness to Pay for Irrigation Services in the Cold Winter Deserts of Uzbekistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2021:i:1:p:94-:d:708902
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/1/94/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/1/94/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Durba Biswas & L. Venkatachalam, 2015. "Farmers' Willingness to Pay for Improved Irrigation Water — A Case Study of Malaprabha Irrigation Project in Karnataka, India," Water Economics and Policy (WEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 1(01), pages 1-24.
    2. Simon Meunier & Dale T. Manning & Loic Queval & Judith A. Cherni & Philippe Dessante & Daniel Zimmerle, 2019. "Determinants of the marginal willingness to pay for improved domestic water and irrigation in partially electrified Rwandan villages," Post-Print hal-02179229, HAL.
    3. Fisher, Brendan & Kulindwa, Kassim & Mwanyoka, Iddi & Turner, R. Kerry & Burgess, Neil D., 2010. "Common pool resource management and PES: Lessons and constraints for water PES in Tanzania," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(6), pages 1253-1261, April.
    4. Kidane, Tesfai T. & Wei, Si & Sibhatu, Kibrom T., 2019. "Smallholder farmers’ willingness to pay for irrigation water: Insights from Eritrea," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 30-37.
    5. Memon, Junaid Alam & Thapa, Gopal B., 2016. "Explaining the de facto open access of public property commons: Insights from the Indus Delta mangroves," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 151-159.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martey, Edward & Etwire, Prince M. & Adombilla, Ramson & Abebrese, Samuel O., 2023. "Information constraint and farmers’ willingness to pay for an irrigation scheduling tool," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    2. Bajaj, Akshi & Singh, S.P. & Nayak, Diptimayee, 2023. "Are farmers willing to pay for groundwater irrigation? Insights from informal groundwater markets in Western Uttar Pradesh, India," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    3. Agerie Nega Wassihun & Yitayew Malede Nega & Wuletaw Mekuria Kebede & Elleni Ewonetu Fenta & Asrat Akele Ayalew, 2022. "Smallholder households’ willingness to pay for sustainable agricultural water supply in case of North West Ethiopia," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 79-98, April.
    4. Kosoy, Nicolás & Corbera, Esteve, 2010. "Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(6), pages 1228-1236, April.
    5. Dimitra Lazaridou & Anastasios Michailidis & Konstantinos Mattas, 2019. "Evaluating the Willingness to Pay for Using Recycled Water for Irrigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-8, September.
    6. Qing Zhou & Yali Zhang & Feng Wu, 2022. "Can Water Price Improve Water Productivity? A Water-Economic-Model-Based Study in Heihe River Basin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, May.
    7. Kolinjivadi, Vijay & Gamboa, Gonzalo & Adamowski, Jan & Kosoy, Nicolás, 2015. "Capabilities as justice: Analysing the acceptability of payments for ecosystem services (PES) through ‘social multi-criteria evaluation’," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 99-113.
    8. Muñoz Escobar, Marcela & Hollaender, Robert & Pineda Weffer, Camilo, 2013. "Institutional durability of payments for watershed ecosystem services: Lessons from two case studies from Colombia and Germany," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 6(C), pages 46-53.
    9. Jana, Sebak Kumar & Tamang, Pravesh, 2023. "Prospects of rehabilitation of ancient irrigation systems in India – A case study from coastal saline zone of West Bengal," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    10. Deh-Haghi, Zoherh & Bagheri, Asghar & Fotourehchi, Zahra & Damalas, Christos A., 2020. "Farmers’ acceptance and willingness to pay for using treated wastewater in crop irrigation: A survey in western Iran," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    11. Ireri, Dave Mwagi, 2017. "Determination Of Willingness To Pay For Irrigation Water Institutions Among Smallholder Farming Households In Mbeere South, Kenya," Research Theses 276429, Collaborative Masters Program in Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    12. Pearson, Amber L. & Rzotkiewicz, Amanda & Mwita, Emiliana & Lopez, Maria Claudia & Zwickle, Adam & Richardson, Robert B., 2017. "Participatory mapping of environmental resources: A comparison of a Tanzanian pastoral community over time," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 259-265.
    13. Cranford, Matthew & Mourato, Susana, 2011. "Community conservation and a two-stage approach to payments for ecosystem services," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 89-98.
    14. Richards, Ryan C. & Rerolle, Julia & Aronson, James & Pereira, Paulo Henrique & Gonçalves, Helena & Brancalion, Pedro H.S., 2015. "Governing a pioneer program on payment for watershed services: Stakeholder involvement, legal frameworks and early lessons from the Atlantic forest of Brazil," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 16(C), pages 23-32.
    15. Hao Wang & Sander Meijerink & Erwin van der Krabben, 2020. "Institutional Design and Performance of Markets for Watershed Ecosystem Services: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-26, August.
    16. Kolinjivadi, Vijay & Adamowski, Jan & Kosoy, Nicolás, 2014. "Recasting payments for ecosystem services (PES) in water resource management: A novel institutional approach," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 10(C), pages 144-154.
    17. Ojea, Elena & Martin-Ortega, Julia, 2015. "Understanding the economic value of water ecosystem services from tropical forests: A systematic review for South and Central America," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 97-106.
    18. Schomers, Sarah & Matzdorf, Bettina, 2013. "Payments for ecosystem services: A review and comparison of developing and industrialized countries," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 6(C), pages 16-30.
    19. Alemu Mekonnen & Zenebe Gebreegziabher & Abebe D. Beyene & Fitsum Hagos, 2019. "Valuation of Access to Irrigation Water in Rural Ethiopia: Application of Choice Experiment and Contingent Valuation Methods," Water Economics and Policy (WEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 6(01), pages 1-26, September.
    20. Biswas, Durba, 2015. "Anchoring Effect in Context of a Familiar Good: A Case Study of Irrigation Water Supply in Rural India," Bangladesh Development Studies, Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies (BIDS), vol. 38(4), pages 91-98, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2021:i:1:p:94-:d:708902. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.