IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i9p5308-d551438.html

Towards More Balanced Territorial Relations—The Role (and Limitations) of Spatial Planning as a Governance Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Karlheinz Knickel

    (HELSUS—Helsinki Institute of Sustainability Science, Department of Economics and Management, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Helsinki, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland)

  • Alexandra Almeida

    (Comissão de Coordenação e Desenvolvimento Regional de Lisboa e Vale do Tejo (CCDR-LVT), 1269-053 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Lisa Bauchinger

    (Federal Institute for Agricultural Economics, Rural and Mountain Research, A-1030 Vienna, Austria)

  • Maria Pia Casini

    (Territorial Planning Office, Province of Lucca, 55100 Lucca, Italy)

  • Bernd Gassler

    (Regional Management of Metropolitan Area of Styria, A-8010 Graz, Austria)

  • Kerstin Hausegger-Nestelberger

    (Regional Management of Metropolitan Area of Styria, A-8010 Graz, Austria)

  • Jesse Heley

    (Research Group ‘New Political Geographies’, Department of Geography and Earth Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth SY23 3DB, UK)

  • Reinhard Henke

    (Regionalverband FrankfurtRheinMain, D-60329 Frankfurt am Main, Germany)

  • Marina Knickel

    (Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment (DAFE), Pisa University, I-56124 Pisa, Italy)

  • Henk Oostindie

    (Rural Sociology Group (RSO), Section Space, Place and Society (SPS), Wageningen University, NL-6700 HB Wageningen, The Netherlands)

  • Ulla Ovaska

    (Rural Studies, Land Use and Natural Resource Governance Group, Natural Resources Institute Finland (LUKE), FI-00790 Helsinki, Finland)

  • Carlos Pina

    (Comissão de Coordenação e Desenvolvimento Regional de Lisboa e Vale do Tejo (CCDR-LVT), 1269-053 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Massimo Rovai

    (Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment (DAFE), Pisa University, I-56124 Pisa, Italy)

  • Hans Vulto

    (Municipality of Ede, NL-6877 Ede, The Netherlands)

  • Johannes S. C. Wiskerke

    (Rural Sociology Group (RSO), Section Space, Place and Society (SPS), Wageningen University, NL-6700 HB Wageningen, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Decision-makers, planners and administrators involved in different policy domains at different governance levels face the important challenge of fostering more balanced, sustainable and territorially integrated development. Well-designed, multi-level, multi-sector and multi-actor governance arrangements can play a key role in this process through orchestrating the interplay between different spheres, activities, actors and interests. In this paper, we examine the role of spatial planning in improving the relations between rural, peri-urban and urban areas. We analyse the strengths and limitations of spatial planning and explore the connections with territorial development. The methodology used for this analysis combines regional case studies in seven European locations—Ede, Frankfurt/Rhein-Main, Styria/Graz, Helsinki, Lisbon, Lucca and Mid Wales, with rapid appraisals, the analysis of published data, expert judgement and triangulation. We ask under which conditions spatial planning can induce more balanced, sustainable territorial relations, and look at the contribution planning can make to achieving sustainable development goals. The problem of ineffective (or toothless) plan implementation provides the entry point into the analysis and discussion. We illustrate why mutually beneficial relations between urban, peri-urban and rural communities (and territories) cannot simply be planned. Instead, these relationships need to be supported by strategies, policy instruments and governance arrangements that foster synergies between different actors and activities. The planning process itself needs to become more transparent and participatory. We conclude that the questions addressed in this article in an exploratory fashion merit further research especially as a more sustainable and territorially integrated development is becoming increasingly important in European policy making.

Suggested Citation

  • Karlheinz Knickel & Alexandra Almeida & Lisa Bauchinger & Maria Pia Casini & Bernd Gassler & Kerstin Hausegger-Nestelberger & Jesse Heley & Reinhard Henke & Marina Knickel & Henk Oostindie & Ulla Ovas, 2021. "Towards More Balanced Territorial Relations—The Role (and Limitations) of Spatial Planning as a Governance Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-18, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:9:p:5308-:d:551438
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/5308/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/5308/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patsy Healey, 2004. "The Treatment of Space and Place in the New Strategic Spatial Planning in Europe," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 45-67, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Massimo Rovai & Tommaso Trinchetti & Francesco Monacci & Maria Andreoli, 2023. "Mapping Ecosystem Services Bundles for Spatial Planning with the AHP Technique: A Case Study in Tuscany (Italy)," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-21, May.
    2. Chen, Haonan & Wang, Hao, 2025. "Breaking the natural resource curse: Can digital government promote natural resource efficiency?-Evidence from the National Pilot Information for the People policy," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 2488-2507.
    3. Jiao Zhang & Qian Wang & Yiping Xia & Katsunori Furuya, 2022. "Knowledge Map of Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development: A Visual Analysis Using CiteSpace," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-24, February.
    4. Yehyun An & Minjee Kim, 2022. "The Current State of Territorial Development of ASEAN Countries and Strategic Types for Balanced Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-28, October.
    5. Muhammad Salem & Arghadeep Bose & Bashar Bashir & Debanjan Basak & Subham Roy & Indrajit R. Chowdhury & Abdullah Alsalman & Naoki Tsurusaki, 2021. "Urban Expansion Simulation Based on Various Driving Factors Using a Logistic Regression Model: Delhi as a Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-17, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Han, Wenjing & Zhang, Xiaoling & Zheng, Xian, 2020. "Land use regulation and urban land value: Evidence from China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    2. Melika Levelt & Leonie Janssen-Jansen, 2013. "The Amsterdam Metropolitan Area Challenge: Opportunities for Inclusive Coproduction in City-Region Governance," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 31(3), pages 540-555, June.
    3. Van den Hoek, Duncan & Spit, Tejo & Hartmann, Thomas, 2020. "Certain flexibilities in land-use plans Towards a method for assessing flexibility," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    4. repec:plo:pone00:0152932 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Federico Savini, 2016. "Self-Organization and Urban Development: Disaggregating the City-Region, Deconstructing Urbanity in Amsterdam," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(6), pages 1152-1169, November.
    6. Edwin Buitelaar & Maaike Galle & Niels Sorel, 2014. "The public planning of private planning: an analysis of controlled spontaneity in the Netherlands," Chapters, in: David Emanuel Andersson & Stefano Moroni (ed.), Cities and Private Planning, chapter 12, pages 248-268, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. Allan Cochrane, 2012. "Making up a Region: The Rise and Fall of the ‘South East of England’ as a Political Territory," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 30(1), pages 95-108, February.
    8. Petra H Roodbol-Mekkes & Adri van den Brink, 2015. "Rescaling Spatial Planning: Spatial Planning Reforms in Denmark, England, and the Netherlands," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 33(1), pages 184-198, February.
    9. Louis Albrechts, 2010. "More of the Same is Not Enough! How Could Strategic Spatial Planning Be Instrumental in Dealing with the Challenges Ahead?," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 37(6), pages 1115-1127, December.
    10. Andreas Novy & Daniela Coimbra Swiatek & Frank Moulaert, 2012. "Social Cohesion: A Conceptual and Political Elucidation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(9), pages 1873-1889, July.
    11. Toni Ahlqvist, 2014. "Building Innovation Excellence of World Class: The Cluster as an Instrument of Spatial Governance in the European Union," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(5), pages 1712-1731, September.
    12. Deepak Gopinath, 2015. "Shifting of the ontological-epistemological balance in contemporary research agendas: a critique," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(5), pages 1873-1882, September.
    13. Neutens, Tijs & Delafontaine, Matthias & Schwanen, Tim & Weghe, Nico Van de, 2012. "The relationship between opening hours and accessibility of public service delivery," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 128-140.
    14. Michael J Keane & John Lennon, 2006. "Delineating Daily Activity Spaces in Rural Areas," ERSA conference papers ersa06p106, European Regional Science Association.
    15. Tsou, Ko-Wan & Cheng, Hao-Teng & Tseng, Fu-Yi, 2015. "Exploring the relationship between multilevel highway networks and local development patterns—a case study of Taiwan," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 160-170.
    16. John B Parr, 2015. "Neglected Aspects of Regional Policy: A Retrospective View," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 33(2), pages 376-392, April.
    17. Stoeglehner, G. & Abart-Heriszt, L., 2022. "Integrated spatial and energy planning in Styria – A role model for local and regional energy transition and climate protection policies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    18. José Maria Codosero Rodas & José Manuel Naranjo Gómez & Rui Alexandre Castanho & José Cabezas, 2018. "Land Valuation Sustainable Model of Urban Planning Development: A Case Study in Badajoz, Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, May.
    19. Cheng, An-Ting, 2024. "Evaluating spatial policies without indicators: A study on Taiwan as a developmental state in transition," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    20. Kristian Olesen, 2012. "Soft Spaces as Vehicles for Neoliberal Transformations of Strategic Spatial Planning?," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 30(5), pages 910-923, October.
    21. Graham Pearce & Sarah Ayres, 2006. "New Patterns of Governance in the English Region: Assessing their Implications for Spatial Planning," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 24(6), pages 909-927, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:9:p:5308-:d:551438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.