IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i7p3864-d527672.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and Assessment of Watershed Management Indicators Using the Budyko Framework Parameter

Author

Listed:
  • Kyeung Kim

    (Department of Rural Systems Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea)

  • Hakkwan Kim

    (Graduate School of International Agricultural Technology & Institutes of Green Bio Science and Technology, Seoul National University, Pyeongchang 25354, Korea)

  • Hyunji Lee

    (Department of Rural Systems Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea)

  • Sang-Min Jun

    (Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea)

  • Soonho Hwang

    (Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea)

  • Jung-Hun Song

    (Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering & Tropical Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Homestead, FL 33031, USA)

  • Moon-Seong Kang

    (Department of Rural Systems Engineering, Research Institute for Agriculture and Life Sciences, Institutes of Green Bio Science and Technology, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea)

Abstract

This study aims to introduce the Budyko curve’s parameter (w) as a watershed quality indicator and establish criteria. Basin-specific (w) was calculated in 183 watersheds based on land use in 2013. Weather data and runoff data were used, and runoff data were calculated using Hydrological Simulation Program-Fortran (HSPF). An estimation model was developed to estimate the w of the unmeasured watershed, and the R 2 of the developed model was 0.917, showing that the modeled value was reliable. A cluster analysis between basin-specific w and impervious area ratio in 2013 was performed to classify watershed quality. w was classified into four grades according to the dendrogram and impervious cover model. Watershed quality in 1975 and 2013 was evaluated using the developed indicators and criteria. The quality grades of 30 watersheds deteriorated, and the deteriorated watershed increased built-up and decreased forest and grass. To evaluate the indicators’ applicability, the low impact development (LID) method was applied to HSPF to confirm the indicator and criteria changes. It showed that the watershed to which LID was applied has improved indicator and reduced grade. The indicator developed in this study is expected to be useful for watershed quality assessment and analysis of improvement effects according to watershed management.

Suggested Citation

  • Kyeung Kim & Hakkwan Kim & Hyunji Lee & Sang-Min Jun & Soonho Hwang & Jung-Hun Song & Moon-Seong Kang, 2021. "Development and Assessment of Watershed Management Indicators Using the Budyko Framework Parameter," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-15, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:7:p:3864-:d:527672
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/7/3864/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/7/3864/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Henrique Chaves & Suzana Alipaz, 2007. "An Integrated Indicator Based on Basin Hydrology, Environment, Life, and Policy: The Watershed Sustainability Index," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 21(5), pages 883-895, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Badir S. Alsaeed & Dexter V. L. Hunt & Soroosh Sharifi, 2024. "A Sustainable Water Resources Management Assessment Framework (SWRM-AF) for Arid and Semi-Arid Regions—Part 1: Developing the Conceptual Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-43, March.
    2. Hamid Kardan Moghaddam & Mohammad Ebrahim Banihabib & Saman Javadi & Timothy O. Randhir, 2021. "A framework for the assessment of qualitative and quantitative sustainable development of groundwater system," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(6), pages 1096-1110, November.
    3. Mohamed Salem Nashwan & Shamsuddin Shahid & Eun-Sung Chung & Kamal Ahmed & Young Hoon Song, 2018. "Development of Climate-Based Index for Hydrologic Hazard Susceptibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-20, June.
    4. José Antonio, Palomero-González & Vicent, Almenar-Llongo & Ramón, Fuentes-Pascual, 2022. "A composite indicator index as a proxy for measuring the quality of water supply as perceived by users for urban water services," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    5. Qian Zhang & Juqin Shen, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity and Driving Factors of Water Resource and Environment Carrying Capacity under High-Quality Economic Development in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-21, September.
    6. Emma Norman & Gemma Dunn & Karen Bakker & Diana Allen & Rafael Cavalcanti de Albuquerque, 2013. "Water Security Assessment: Integrating Governance and Freshwater Indicators," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 27(2), pages 535-551, January.
    7. Xiu-ju Zhang & Ning Qiu & Wen-Rong Zhao & Huan An & Julius Tommy, 2015. "Water environment early warning index system in Tongzhou District," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 75(3), pages 2699-2714, February.
    8. Badir S. Alsaeed & Dexter V. L. Hunt & Soroosh Sharifi, 2024. "A Sustainable Water Resources Management Assessment Framework (SWRM-AF) for Arid and Semi-Arid Regions—Part 2: Refining the Conceptual Framework Using the Delphi Technique," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-26, May.
    9. Eros Borsato & Marco Martello & Francesco Marinello & Lucia Bortolini, 2019. "Environmental and Economic Sustainability Assessment for Two Different Sprinkler and A Drip Irrigation Systems: A Case Study on Maize Cropping," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-15, August.
    10. Lucy Guimarães & Alessandra Magrini, 2008. "A Proposal of Indicators for Sustainable Development in the Management of River Basins," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 22(9), pages 1191-1202, September.
    11. M. Lenhardt & G. Markovic & Z. Gacic, 2009. "Decline in the Index of Biotic Integrity of the Fish Assemblage as a Response to Reservoir Aging," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 23(9), pages 1713-1723, July.
    12. Yi Zhang & Wenwen Xue & Yingnan Wen & Xianjia Wang, 2022. "Sustainability Assessment of Water Resources Use in 31 Provinces in China: A Combination Method of Entropy Weight and Cloud Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-19, October.
    13. Badir S. Alsaeed & Dexter V. L. Hunt & Soroosh Sharifi, 2022. "Sustainable Water Resources Management Assessment Frameworks (SWRM-AF) for Arid and Semi-Arid Regions: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-31, November.
    14. S. E. Dickson & C. J. Schuster-Wallace & J. J. Newton, 2016. "Water Security Assessment Indicators: The Rural Context," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(5), pages 1567-1604, March.
    15. Xi Yang & Xingwei Chen, 2021. "Using a combined evaluation method to assess water resources sustainable utilization in Fujian Province, China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 8047-8061, May.
    16. Wei Shen & Zhicheng Zheng & Yaochen Qin & Yang Li, 2020. "Spatiotemporal Characteristics and Driving Force of Ecosystem Health in an Important Ecological Function Region in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-19, July.
    17. de Castro-Pardo, Mónica & Cabello, José Manuel & Martín, José María & Ruiz, Francisco, 2023. "A multi reference point based index to assess and monitor European water policies from a sustainability approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    18. Namrata Sahu & Pragati Golchha & Arup Das & Tarak Nath Mazumder & Partha Sarathi Ghosal, 2025. "Hierarchical framework for assessment of water sensitivity in land use planning: case of Raipur urban agglomeration, India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(7), pages 17283-17305, July.
    19. Mika Marttunen & Jyri Mustajoki & Suvi Sojamo & Lauri Ahopelto & Marko Keskinen, 2019. "A Framework for Assessing Water Security and the Water–Energy–Food Nexus—The Case of Finland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-24, May.
    20. Agustí Pérez-Foguet & Ricard Giné Garriga, 2011. "Analyzing Water Poverty in Basins," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 25(14), pages 3595-3612, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:7:p:3864-:d:527672. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.