IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i6p3450-d520916.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Role of Spatial Analysis in Avoiding Climate Change Maladaptation: A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Chia-Fa Chi

    (Department of Marine Environment and Engineering, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung 80424, Taiwan)

  • Shiau-Yun Lu

    (Department of Marine Environment and Engineering, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung 80424, Taiwan)

  • Willow Hallgren

    (Environmental Futures Research Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Southport, QLD 4215, Australia
    Griffith Climate Change Response Program, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Southport, QLD 4215, Australia)

  • Daniel Ware

    (Griffith Climate Change Response Program, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Southport, QLD 4215, Australia
    Griffith Centre for Coastal Management, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Southport, QLD 4215, Australia)

  • Rodger Tomlinson

    (Griffith Centre for Coastal Management, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Southport, QLD 4215, Australia)

Abstract

With the rapid development of climate change adaptation over recent decades, a considerable amount of evidence has been collected on maladaptation associated with climate change adaptation initiatives, particularly in terms of risk transfer and risk substitution. Increasing our understanding of maladaptation is important for avoiding negative outcomes of adaptation project implementation. However, maladaptation has received limited research attention. Previous research has focused on frameworks that can assist in defining and avoiding maladaptive risk and be applied to adaptation initiative planning processes. Adaptation may cause more significant influences on spatial land change than the direct effect of climate change does. Identifying the adaptation consequences that are likely to result in maladaptation is crucial. A combination of spatial land analysis and climate change analysis can be used for the aforementioned identification. However, empirical case studies on methods that can assess and evaluate the risk of maladaptation by integrating spatial and temporal aspects in a land spatial modeling tool have not been conducted. The present study aimed to fill this research gap by exploring the existing knowledge on maladaptation to climate change. We examined the interaction among spatial analysis, evaluated maladaptation frameworks, and project design to extend our conceptual understanding on maladaptation to climate change. We adopted a systematic review method that involved considering several questions including the following: (a) What are the definitions and categories of maladaptation? (b) What methods and theoretical frameworks exist for the assessment and evaluation of maladaptive risk? (c) How have climate-related research communities considered issues of maladaptation? (d) What are the experimental studies on land use change that can be referred to for minimizing maladaptive risks in future adaptation planning? In conclusion, further research on maladaptation should integrate spatial land analysis methods to facilitate the identification and avoidance of maladaptive risk in the initial stage of adaptation planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Chia-Fa Chi & Shiau-Yun Lu & Willow Hallgren & Daniel Ware & Rodger Tomlinson, 2021. "Role of Spatial Analysis in Avoiding Climate Change Maladaptation: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-22, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:6:p:3450-:d:520916
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/6/3450/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/6/3450/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Antoci, Angelo & Gori, Luca & Sodini, Mauro & Ticci, Elisa, 2019. "Maladaptation and global indeterminacy," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(6), pages 643-659, December.
    2. Natalie Kopytko, 2016. "Change and transition: the climate of Ukraine's agri-food sector," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 68-87, January.
    3. Claudia Bouroncle & Pablo Imbach & Beatriz Rodríguez-Sánchez & Claudia Medellín & Armando Martinez-Valle & Peter Läderach, 2017. "Mapping climate change adaptive capacity and vulnerability of smallholder agricultural livelihoods in Central America: ranking and descriptive approaches to support adaptation strategies," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 141(1), pages 123-137, March.
    4. Antoci, Angelo & Gori, Luca & Sodini, Mauro & Ticci, Elisa, 2019. "Maladaptation and global indeterminacy – Erratum," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(6), pages 660-660, December.
    5. Fenton, Adrian & Paavola, Jouni & Tallontire, Anne, 2017. "The Role of Microfinance in Household Livelihood Adaptation in Satkhira District, Southwest Bangladesh," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 192-202.
    6. Courtney Work & Vannrith Rong & Danik Song & Arnim Scheidel, 2019. "Maladaptation and development as usual? Investigating climate change mitigation and adaptation projects in Cambodia," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(S1), pages 47-62, July.
    7. Katrina Brown & Larissa A. Naylor & Tara Quinn, 2017. "Making Space for Proactive Adaptation of Rapidly Changing Coasts: A Windows of Opportunity Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-17, August.
    8. Juhola, Sirkku & Glaas, Erik & Linnér, Björn-Ola & Neset, Tina-Simone, 2016. "Redefining maladaptation," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(P1), pages 135-140.
    9. Tapan K Dhar & Luna Khirfan, 2017. "Climate change adaptation in the urban planning and design research: missing links and research agenda," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(4), pages 602-627, April.
    10. Anna Lukasiewicz & Jamie Pittock & C. Max Finlayson, 2016. "Are we adapting to climate change? A catchment-based adaptation assessment tool for freshwater ecosystems," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 138(3), pages 641-654, October.
    11. Berry Gersonius & Richard Ashley & Assela Pathirana & Chris Zevenbergen, 2013. "Climate change uncertainty: building flexibility into water and flood risk infrastructure," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 116(2), pages 411-423, January.
    12. Tessa Eikelboom & Ron Janssen, 2017. "Collaborative use of geodesign tools to support decision-making on adaptation to climate change," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 247-266, February.
    13. Yaser Abunnasr & Elisabeth M. Hamin & Elizabeth Brabec, 2015. "Windows of opportunity: addressing climate uncertainty through adaptation plan implementation," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(1), pages 135-155, January.
    14. Biola K. Badmos & Sampson K. Agodzo & Grace B. Villamor & Samuel N. Odai, 2015. "An Approach for Simulating Soil Loss from an Agro-Ecosystem Using Multi-Agent Simulation: A Case Study for Semi-Arid Ghana," Land, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-20, July.
    15. Tina-Simone Neset & Therese Asplund & Janina Käyhkö & Sirkku Juhola, 2019. "Making sense of maladaptation: Nordic agriculture stakeholders’ perspectives," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 153(1), pages 107-121, March.
    16. Sierra C. Woodruff, 2016. "Planning for an unknowable future: uncertainty in climate change adaptation planning," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 139(3), pages 445-459, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amit Tubi & Joe Williams, 2021. "Beyond binary outcomes in climate adaptation: The illustrative case of desalination," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(2), March.
    2. Buccella, Domenico & Fanti, Luciano & Gori, Luca, 2021. "To abate, or not to abate? A strategic approach on green production in Cournot and Bertrand duopolies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    3. Eriksen, Siri & Schipper, E. Lisa F. & Scoville-Simonds, Morgan & Vincent, Katharine & Adam, Hans Nicolai & Brooks, Nick & Harding, Brian & Khatri, Dil & Lenaerts, Lutgart & Liverman, Diana & Mills-No, 2021. "Adaptation interventions and their effect on vulnerability in developing countries: Help, hindrance or irrelevance?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    4. Sierra C. Woodruff, 2016. "Planning for an unknowable future: uncertainty in climate change adaptation planning," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 139(3), pages 445-459, December.
    5. Antoci, Angelo & Borghesi, Simone & Galeotti, Marcello & Sodini, Mauro, 2021. "Living in an uncertain world: Environment substitution, local and global indeterminacy," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    6. Pramod K. Singh & Konstantinos Papageorgiou & Harpalsinh Chudasama & Elpiniki I. Papageorgiou, 2019. "Evaluating the Effectiveness of Climate Change Adaptations in the World’s Largest Mangrove Ecosystem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-17, November.
    7. Gori, Luca & Sodini, Mauro, 2020. "Endogenous labour supply, endogenous lifetime and economic development," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 238-259.
    8. Victoria Wibeck & Tina‐Simone Neset, 2020. "Focus groups and serious gaming in climate change communication research—A methodological review," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(5), September.
    9. Andrea Caravaggio & Mauro Sodini, 2020. "Local Environmental Quality and Heterogeneity in an OLG Agent-Based Model with Network Externalities," Discussion Papers 2020/257, Dipartimento di Economia e Management (DEM), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
    10. Antoci, Angelo & Borghesi, Simone & Galeotti, Marcello & Russu, Paolo, 2022. "Maladaptation to environmental degradation and the interplay between negative and positive externalities," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    11. Ibrahim, Muhammad Asim & Johansson, Marie, 2022. "Combating climate change – What, where and how to implement adaptive measures in the agriculture sector of Öland, Sweden, keeping in view the constraints of carrying capacities and risk of maladaptati," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    12. Andrea Caravaggio & Mauro Sodini, 2022. "Local environmental quality and heterogeneity in an OLG agent-based model with spatial externalities," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 17(1), pages 287-317, January.
    13. Sadie McEvoy & Frans H. M. van de Ven & Reinder Brolsma & Jill H. Slinger, 2019. "Evaluating a Planning Support System’s Use and Effects in Urban Adaptation: An Exploratory Case Study from Berlin, Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-27, December.
    14. Samuel Asumadu Sarkodie & Maruf Yakubu Ahmed & Phebe Asantewaa Owusu, 2022. "Global adaptation readiness and income mitigate sectoral climate change vulnerabilities," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-17, December.
    15. Agnieszka Kurdyś-Kujawska & Agnieszka Sompolska-Rzechuła & Joanna Pawłowska-Tyszko & Michał Soliwoda, 2021. "Crop Insurance, Land Productivity and the Environment: A Way forward to a Better Understanding," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, November.
    16. Haixing Liu & Yuntao Wang & Chi Zhang & Albert S. Chen & Guangtao Fu, 2018. "Assessing real options in urban surface water flood risk management under climate change," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 94(1), pages 1-18, October.
    17. Kim, Amy M. & Li, Huanan, 2020. "Incorporating the impacts of climate change in transportation infrastructure decision models," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 271-287.
    18. Giovanni Matteo & Pierfrancesco Nardi & Stefano Grego & Caterina Guidi, 2018. "Bibliometric analysis of Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment research," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 38(4), pages 508-516, December.
    19. Virna Estefania Moran-Rodas & Verena Preusse & Christine Wachendorf, 2022. "Agricultural Management Practices and Decision-Making in View of Soil Organic Matter in the Urbanizing Region of Bangalore," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-27, May.
    20. Ulfia A. Lenfers & Julius Weyl & Thomas Clemen, 2018. "Firewood Collection in South Africa: Adaptive Behavior in Social-Ecological Models," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-17, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:6:p:3450-:d:520916. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.