IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i3p1215-d486246.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Indoor Camping in Fortified Heritage Buildings: A New Way of Sustainable Tourism Valorization

Author

Listed:
  • Roberta Kontošić Pamić

    (Department of Entrepreneurship, Faculty of Economics and Tourism, Juraj Dobrila University of Pula, 52100 Pula, Croatia)

  • Iva Slivar

    (Department of Tourism, Faculty of Economics and Tourism, Juraj Dobrila University of Pula, 52100 Pula, Croatia)

  • Tamara Floričić

    (Department of Tourism, Faculty of Economics and Tourism, Juraj Dobrila University of Pula, 52100 Pula, Croatia)

Abstract

Indoor camping is an innovative, sustainable model of accommodation, the least intrusive one in solid facilities. Its temporary tourism function demands almost no additional construction work, meaning no permanent modification of space is needed for tourism purposes. Fortifications and defence buildings are recognised as valuable cultural attractions and present an anthropogenic resource with potential for touristic valorisation, both as sightseeing facilities as well as accommodation facilities. This paper explores the connection between the requirements of heritage protection of fortifications and the requirements of the application of indoor camping in these fortifications. The purpose of this paper is to help conserve fortifications by providing funding for their maintenance with the application of this innovative accommodation model respecting the principles of sustainability and health and safety standards in post-Covid tourism. The goal is to provide a general framework that could reconcile tourism businesses on one side and conservators on the other. The main scientific contribution is summarised in the framework of adequate implementation of indoor camping in fortified buildings according to conservators’ requirements. The interview technique was used to assess this. The authors found that indoor camping can be a suitable accommodation model in fortified buildings. The key limitation of the model is based on the fact that an individual approach is necessary for every heritage building, as well as fortification, since they are unique. Therefore, each application of an indoor camping model should receive a proper conservators’ permit before the entrepreneurship venture. Furthermore, the opinions of key stakeholders were also investigated.

Suggested Citation

  • Roberta Kontošić Pamić & Iva Slivar & Tamara Floričić, 2021. "Indoor Camping in Fortified Heritage Buildings: A New Way of Sustainable Tourism Valorization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:3:p:1215-:d:486246
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/3/1215/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/3/1215/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Małgorzata Fedorczak-Cisak & Alicja Kowalska-Koczwara & Filip Pachla & Elżbieta Radziszewska-Zielina & Bartłomiej Szewczyk & Grzegorz Śladowski & Tadeusz Tatara, 2020. "Fuzzy Model for Selecting a Form of Use Alternative for a Historic Building to be Subjected to Adaptive Reuse," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-24, June.
    2. Parga Dans, Eva & Alonso González, Pablo, 2019. "Sustainable tourism and social value at World Heritage Sites: Towards a conservation plan for Altamira, Spain," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 68-80.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniela Sorea & Codrina Csesznek & Gabriela Georgeta Rățulea, 2022. "The Culture-Centered Development Potential of Communities in Făgăraș Land (Romania)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-32, June.
    2. Palazzo, Maria & Vollero, Agostino & Vitale, Pierluigi & Siano, Alfonso, 2021. "Urban and rural destinations on Instagram: Exploring the influencers’ role in #sustainabletourism," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    3. He, Jun & Huang, Zilong & Mishra, Arunodaya Raj & Alrasheedi, Melfi, 2021. "Developing a new framework for conceptualizing the emerging sustainable community-based tourism using an extended interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy SWARA-MULTIMOORA," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    4. Alper Bozkurt & Ferhat Şeker, 2023. "Harmonizing Heritage and Artificial Neural Networks: The Role of Sustainable Tourism in UNESCO World Heritage Sites," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-17, August.
    5. Eva Parga Dans & Pablo Alonso González, 2021. "The Unethical Enterprise of the Past: Lessons from the Collapse of Archaeological Heritage Management in Spain," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 172(3), pages 447-461, September.
    6. Elżbieta Radziszewska-Zielina & Dagmara Adamkiewicz & Bartłomiej Szewczyk & Olga Kania, 2022. "Decision-Making Support for Housing Projects in Post-Industrial Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-26, March.
    7. Eleonora Santos, 2023. "From Neglect to Progress: Assessing Social Sustainability and Decent Work in the Tourism Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-25, June.
    8. Chengcai Tang & Ziwei Wan & Pin Ng & Xiangyi Dai & Qiuxiang Sheng & Da Chen, 2019. "Temporal and Spatial Evolution of Carbon Emissions and Their Influencing Factors for Tourist Attractions at Heritage Tourist Destinations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-19, October.
    9. Sifeng Nian & Fajian Liu & Min Chen & Guoqing Cheng, 2022. "Satisfaction of Tourism Communities in World Heritage Sites Based on Residents’ Perceptions—Study Area of Mount Sanqingshan National Park, PRC," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23, December.
    10. Jiachen Li & Mengru Xie & Mengfei Yu & Young-joo Ahn, 2024. "Understanding Tourists’ Social Networking Site (SNS) Intention with Regards to World Heritage Sites: The Role of Motivation and Overall Image," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-15, April.
    11. Mercedes Raquel Garcia Revilla & Olga Martinez Moure & Dorin Paul Bac, 2020. "Tourist Quality Of Spain Beaches Under The Perspective Of Sustainability," Oradea Journal of Business and Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 5(1), pages 29-39, March.
    12. Ana Pastor Pérez & David Barreiro Martínez & Eva Parga-Dans & Pablo Alonso González, 2021. "Democratising Heritage Values: A Methodological Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-26, November.
    13. Bożena Orlik-Kożdoń & Elżbieta Radziszewska-Zielina & Małgorzata Fedorczak-Cisak & Tomasz Steidl & Andrzej Białkiewicz & Maria Żychowska & Andriy Muzychak, 2020. "Historic Building Thermal Diagnostics Algorithm Presented for the Example of a Townhouse in Lviv," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-28, October.
    14. Xiaoxu Liang & Cristina Coscia & Elena Dellapiana & John Martin & Yu Zhang, 2022. "Complex Social Value-Based Approach for Decision-Making and Valorization Process in Chinese World Cultural Heritage Site: The Case of Kulangsu (China)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-30, April.
    15. Hellen Lillian Atieno Dawo & Thomas B. Long & Gjalt de Jong, 2023. "Sustainable entrepreneurship and legitimacy building in protected areas: Overcoming distinctive barriers through activism," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 72-95, January.
    16. Chia-Li Lin, 2022. "Evaluating the urban sustainable development strategies and common suited paths considering various stakeholders," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(12), pages 14033-14073, December.
    17. Qingliu Ren & Baoshi He & Xiaodong Chen & Jiali Han & Fang Han, 2021. "The Mechanism and Mediating Effect of the “Perception–Emotion–Behaviour” Chain of Tourists at World Natural Heritage Sites—A Case Study from Bayanbulak, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-19, November.
    18. Amélia Brandão & Carmo Cupertino de Miranda, 2022. "Does Sustainable Consumption Behaviour Influence Luxury Services Purchase Intention?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-28, June.
    19. Diallo, Mbaye Fall & Diop-Sall, Fatou & Leroux, Erick & Vachon, Marc-Antoine, 2022. "How do tourism sustainability and nature affinity affect social engagement propensity? The central roles of nature conservation attitude and personal tourist experience," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    20. Przemysław Markiewicz-Zahorski & Joanna Rucińska & Małgorzata Fedorczak-Cisak & Michał Zielina, 2021. "Building Energy Performance Analysis after Changing Its Form of Use from an Office to a Residential Building," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-24, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:3:p:1215-:d:486246. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.