IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i24p13965-d705046.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is Corporate Social Entrepreneurship a (So Far) Missed Opportunity for Higher Education Institutions? Evidence from Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Iris Rickhoff-Fischer

    (Domhan Vision, 27798 Hude, Germany)

  • Christoph Schank

    (Faculty of Educational and Societal Sciences, University of Vechta, 49377 Vechta, Germany)

  • Arne Ortland

    (Domhan Vision, 27798 Hude, Germany)

Abstract

(1) Background: Corporate social entrepreneurship (CSE) is a young phenomenon courting recognition that is attracting increasing attention in academia and corporate practice. Nevertheless, it has rarely found its way into the curricula of higher education institutions (HEI), which raises the question of the concept’s potential for further development in the realm of academic teaching; (2) Our study is based on a mostly qualitative research design consisting of expert interviews, focus groups, and a low-standardized survey; (3) Results: Corporate social entrepreneurship is seen as having strong potential to enrich education at institutions of higher learning, to establish new forms of teaching, and to bridge the gap between higher education and society; (4) Conclusions: Although our results indicate industry need and student demand for competent corporate social entrepreneurs, German HEIs have not yet integrated CSE-specific education into their curricula. However, the required competences are covered by CSE-related fields of study, which hampers the holistic education of CSE learners. A CSE curriculum needs to cover core CSE concepts as well as key competences, and the engagement of quadruple helix stakeholders requires an adjustable and transversal approach of curriculum development.

Suggested Citation

  • Iris Rickhoff-Fischer & Christoph Schank & Arne Ortland, 2021. "Is Corporate Social Entrepreneurship a (So Far) Missed Opportunity for Higher Education Institutions? Evidence from Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:24:p:13965-:d:705046
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/24/13965/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/24/13965/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lukman Raimi & Innocent Akhuemonkhan & Olakunle Dare Ogunjirin, 2015. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Entrepreneurship (CSRE): antidotes to poverty, insecurity and underdevelopment in Nigeria," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(1), pages 56-81, March.
    2. Laura Michelini & Daniela Fiorentino, 2012. "New business models for creating shared value," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 8(4), pages 561-577, September.
    3. Laura Michelini, 2012. "Social Innovation and New Business Models," SpringerBriefs in Business, Springer, edition 127, number 978-3-642-32150-4, October.
    4. Reza Zaefarian & Misagh Tasavori & Pervez N. Ghauri, 2015. "A Corporate Social Entrepreneurship Approach to Market-Based Poverty Reduction," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(2), pages 320-334, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brunella Arru, 2015. "Indagine sulla comunicazione della responsabilit? sociale delle societ? quotate italiane," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(4), pages 15-46.
    2. Marcineková, Tatiana & Borbélyová, Diana & Tirpáková, Anna, 2020. "Optimization of children’s transition from preschool and family environment to the first grade of primary school in Slovakia by implementation of an adaptation programme," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    3. Karen Hidden & Jonathan Tresman Marks, 2020. "Misaligned Needs in the Pursuit of Shared Value: A Multi-Stakeholder Study of the Shift from Corporate Social Responsibility to Corporate Social Entrepreneurship in an Emerging Economy," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 6(2), pages 363-382, July.
    4. Richard W. Butler & Adam R. Szromek, 2019. "Incorporating the Value Proposition for Society with Business Models of Health Tourism Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-19, November.
    5. Vikas Kumar, 2020. "Social Innovation for Agricultural Development: A Study of System of Rice Intensification in Bihar, India," Millennial Asia, , vol. 11(1), pages 99-118, April.
    6. Kuklytė Jūratė & Vveinhardt Jolita, 2017. "Maximization of Created Social Value: Social Business Models and Their Application Tendencies in Lithuania," Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, Sciendo, vol. 77(1), pages 57-79, June.
    7. van Assen, Arjen & Knot-Dickscheit, Jana & Grietens, Hans & Post, Wendy, 2021. "Fidelity and flexibility of care activities in child-centered youth care for children growing up in families experiencing complex and multiple problems," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    8. Shah, Muhammad Umair & Guild, Paul D., 2022. "Stakeholder engagement strategy of technology firms: A review and applied view of stakeholder theory," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    9. Dionisio, Marcelo & de Vargas, Eduardo Raupp, 2020. "Corporate social innovation: A systematic literature review," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(2).
    10. Wenyuan Li & Mohammed Abubakari Sadick & Abdul-Aziz Ibn Musah & Salisu Mustapha, 2018. "The Moderating Effect of Social Innovation in Perspectives of Shared Value Creation in the Educational Sector of Ghana," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-26, November.
    11. Parthasarathy, Balaji & Dey, Supriya & Gupta, Pranjali, 2021. "Overcoming wicked problems and institutional voids for social innovation: University-NGO partnerships in the Global South," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    12. Aleksander Pabian & Katarzyna Bilińska-Reformat, 2021. "The Potential and Need to Implement the New Concept of Social Innovation into the Management Practice of Modern Energy Companies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-12, October.
    13. Alijani, Sharam & Karyotis, Catherine, 2019. "Coping with impact investing antagonistic objectives: A multistakeholder approach," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 10-17.
    14. Guo, Su & Guan, Shanshan & Yan, Xiaoqian, 2021. "Effects of early learning environment on early childhood development in rural areas in China," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    15. Dongmin Lee & Junghoon Moon & Young Chan Choe & Jaeseok Jeong, 2016. "Impacts of Socially Responsible Corporate Activities on Korean Consumers’ Corporate Evaluations in the Agrifood Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-18, December.
    16. Nematollah Shiri & Vahid Jafari‐Sadeghi, 2023. "Corporate social responsibility and green behaviour: Towards sustainable food‐business development," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 605-620, March.
    17. Nadia Preghenella & Cinzia Battistella, 2021. "Exploring business models for sustainability: A bibliographic investigation of the literature and future research directions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2505-2522, July.
    18. Alina MECA & Valentin-Marian ANTOHI & Romeo-Victor IONESCU & Dragos Sebastian CRISTEA & Laurentiu-Nicolae PRICOPE & Monica Laura ZLATI, 2023. "The Development of the Social Economy in Europe in the Context of the Global Economic Crisis," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 2, pages 47-53.
    19. Joaquin Sanchez-Planelles & Marival Segarra-Oña & Angel Peiro-Signes, 2020. "Building a Theoretical Framework for Corporate Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, December.
    20. Mirela Panait & Irina Radulescu & Alina Brezoi, 2020. "Financial Markets – Under the Sign of CSR. Some Evidences Regarding Financial Education," Book chapters-LUMEN Proceedings, in: Adriana Grigorescu & Valentin Radu (ed.), 1st International Conference Global Ethics - Key of Sustainability (GEKoS), edition 1, volume 11, chapter 11, pages 96-106, Editura Lumen.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:24:p:13965-:d:705046. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.