IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i24p13906-d703783.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hubs for Circularity: Geo-Based Industrial Clustering towards Urban Symbiosis in Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Francisco Mendez Alva

    (Energy & Cluster Management-EELAB, Department of Electromechanical, Systems and Metal Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Ghent University, Tech Lane Ghent Science Park Campus A, Technolo-giepark-Zwijnaarde 131, 9052 Ghent, Belgium)

  • Rob De Boever

    (Energy & Cluster Management-EELAB, Department of Electromechanical, Systems and Metal Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Ghent University, Tech Lane Ghent Science Park Campus A, Technolo-giepark-Zwijnaarde 131, 9052 Ghent, Belgium)

  • Greet Van Eetvelde

    (Energy & Cluster Management-EELAB, Department of Electromechanical, Systems and Metal Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Ghent University, Tech Lane Ghent Science Park Campus A, Technolo-giepark-Zwijnaarde 131, 9052 Ghent, Belgium)

Abstract

Since the Green Deal, ambitious climate and resource neutrality goals have been set in Europe. Here, process industries hold a unique position due to their energy and material transformation capabilities. They are encouraged to develop cross-sectorial hubs for achieving not only climate ambition, but also joining a circular economy through urban–industrial symbiosis with both business and community stakeholders. This research proposes a data-based approach to identify potential hub locations by means of cluster analysis. A total of three different algorithms are compared on a set of location and pollution data of European industrial facilities: K-means, hierarchical agglomerative and density-based spatial clustering. The DBSCAN algorithm gave the best indication of potential locations for hubs because of its capacity to tune the main parameters. It evidenced that predominately west European countries have a high potential for identifying hubs for circularity (H4Cs) due to their industrial density. In Eastern Europe, the industrial landscape is more scattered, suggesting that additional incentives might be needed to develop H4Cs. Furthermore, industrial activities such as the production of aluminium, cement, lime, plaster, or electricity are observed to have a relatively lower tendency to cluster compared with the petrochemical sector. Finally, further lines of research to identify and develop industrial H4Cs are suggested.

Suggested Citation

  • Francisco Mendez Alva & Rob De Boever & Greet Van Eetvelde, 2021. "Hubs for Circularity: Geo-Based Industrial Clustering towards Urban Symbiosis in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-25, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:24:p:13906-:d:703783
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/24/13906/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/24/13906/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. D. Rachel Lombardi & Peter Laybourn, 2012. "Redefining Industrial Symbiosis," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 16(1), pages 28-37, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Abraham & Wang, Jason X. & Farooque, Muhammad & Wang, Yulan & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2021. "Multi-dimensional circular supply chain management: A comparative review of the state-of-the-art practices and research," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    2. João Azevedo & Juan Henriques & Marco Estrela & Rui Dias & Doroteya Vladimirova & Karen Miller & Muriel Iten, 2021. "Guidelines for Industrial Symbiosis—a Systematic Approach for Content Definition and Practical Recommendations for Implementation," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.
    3. Frone Simona & Constantinescu Andreea, 2017. "Industrial Symbiosis For Promoting The Green Economy In Romania," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 4, pages 25-34, August.
    4. Fraccascia, Luca & Albino, Vito & Garavelli, Claudio A., 2017. "Technical efficiency measures of industrial symbiosis networks using enterprise input-output analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PA), pages 273-286.
    5. Anna Gatzioura & Miquel Sànchez-Marrè & Karina Gibert, 2019. "A Hybrid Recommender System to Improve Circular Economy in Industrial Symbiotic Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-24, September.
    6. Fortuna, Lorena M. & Diyamandoglu, Vasil, 2015. "NYC WasteMatch – An online facilitated materials exchange as a tool for pollution prevention," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 122-131.
    7. João Pinto & Rui Boavida-Dias & Henrique A. Matos & João Azevedo, 2022. "Analysis of the Food Loss and Waste Valorisation of Animal By-Products from the Retail Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-27, February.
    8. Jensen, Paul D., 2016. "The role of geospatial industrial diversity in the facilitation of regional industrial symbiosis," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 92-103.
    9. Cristina Maranesi & Pietro De Giovanni, 2020. "Modern Circular Economy: Corporate Strategy, Supply Chain, and Industrial Symbiosis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-25, November.
    10. Michael Kühnen & Samanthi Silva & Rüdiger Hahn, 2022. "From negative to positive sustainability performance measurement and assessment? A qualitative inquiry drawing on framing effects theory," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 1985-2001, July.
    11. Tsiligiannis, Aristeides & Tsiliyannis, Christos, 2020. "Oil refinery sludge and renewable fuel blends as energy sources for the cement industry," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 55-70.
    12. Kokoulina, L. & Ermolaeva, L., 2016. "Championing processes and the emergence of industrial symbiosis: Case of Yandex data center in Finland," Working Papers 6446, Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University.
    13. Luca Fraccascia & Vahid Yazdanpanah & Guido Capelleveen & Devrim Murat Yazan, 2021. "Energy-based industrial symbiosis: a literature review for circular energy transition," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 4791-4825, April.
    14. Cristina Ramos Cáceres & Suzanna Törnroth & Mattias Vesterlund & Andreas Johansson & Marcus Sandberg, 2022. "Data-Center Farming: Exploring the Potential of Industrial Symbiosis in a Subarctic Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-23, February.
    15. Daniela C. A. Pigosso & Andreas Schmiegelow & Maj Munch Andersen, 2018. "Measuring the Readiness of SMEs for Eco-Innovation and Industrial Symbiosis: Development of a Screening Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-25, August.
    16. Glen D. Corder & Artem Golev & Julian Fyfe & Sarah King, 2014. "The Status of Industrial Ecology in Australia: Barriers and Enablers," Resources, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-22, March.
    17. Emilia Faria & Cristiane Barreto & Armando Caldeira-Pires & Jorge Alfredo Cerqueira Streit & Patricia Guarnieri, 2023. "Brazilian Circular Economy Pilot Project: Integrating Local Stakeholders’ Perception and Social Context in Industrial Symbiosis Analyses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-28, February.
    18. Haradhan Kumar MOHAJAN, 2020. "Circular Economy can Provide a Sustainable Global Society," Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, Alliance of Central-Eastern European Universities, vol. 9(3), pages 38-62, September.
    19. Jiajia Huan & Ling Han, 2022. "Potential Contribution to Carbon Neutrality Strategy from Industrial Symbiosis: Evidence from a Local Coal-Aluminum-Electricity-Steel Industrial System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, February.
    20. Juan Diego Henriques & João Azevedo & Rui Dias & Marco Estrela & Cristina Ascenço & Doroteya Vladimirova & Karen Miller, 2022. "Implementing Industrial Symbiosis Incentives: an Applied Assessment Framework for Risk Mitigation," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:24:p:13906-:d:703783. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.