IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i22p12459-d676897.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Building Resilience to Natural Hazards at a Local Level in Germany—Research Note on Dealing with Tensions at the Interface of Science and Practice

Author

Listed:
  • Gérard Hutter

    (Research Area Built Environment—Resources and Environmental Risks, Leibniz-Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development (IOER), Weberplatz 1, 01217 Dresden, Germany)

  • Alfred Olfert

    (Research Area Built Environment—Resources and Environmental Risks, Leibniz-Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development (IOER), Weberplatz 1, 01217 Dresden, Germany)

  • Marco Neubert

    (Research Area Built Environment—Resources and Environmental Risks, Leibniz-Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development (IOER), Weberplatz 1, 01217 Dresden, Germany)

  • Regine Ortlepp

    (Research Area Built Environment—Resources and Environmental Risks, Leibniz-Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development (IOER), Weberplatz 1, 01217 Dresden, Germany)

Abstract

Building resilience is a core element of urban resilience that refers to both the (1) intended physical change of the building stock and the related blue, green, and grey infrastructure, as well as (2) the social process of increasing resilience through the goal-driven cooperation of scientists and practitioners. Building resilience at the interface of science and practice is characterized by tensions and a range of approaches to dealing with tensions. To specify this proposition, this research note adopts a strategic spatial planning perspective and introduces the typology of “motors of change” from organizational and management research. We focus on a goal-driven motor of change (“teleology”) and highlight three approaches to dealing with tensions: developing a strategic focus of knowledge integration, setting priorities to enhance resilience as a pro-active ability of disaster risk reduction (DRR), and compromising in the management of trade-offs, such as those between the scales of resilience. For the purpose of illustration, this research note refers to examples of building resilience at a local level in Germany, dealing with heat stress in urban areas, managing the risk of extreme flood events, and analyzing the resilience of innovative infrastructure solutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Gérard Hutter & Alfred Olfert & Marco Neubert & Regine Ortlepp, 2021. "Building Resilience to Natural Hazards at a Local Level in Germany—Research Note on Dealing with Tensions at the Interface of Science and Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-22, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:22:p:12459-:d:676897
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12459/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12459/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ali Farazmand, 2009. "Hurricane Katrina, the Crisis of Leadership, and Chaos Management: Time for Trying the ‘Surprise Management Theory in Action’," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 9(4), pages 399-412, December.
    2. Mikhail V. Chester & Samuel Markolf & Braden Allenby, 2019. "Infrastructure and the environment in the Anthropocene," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 23(5), pages 1006-1015, October.
    3. Gérard Hutter & Thorsten Wiechmann, 2022. "Time, Temporality, and Planning – Comments on the State of Art in Strategic Spatial Planning Research," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 157-164, January.
    4. Thomas Elmqvist & Erik Andersson & Niki Frantzeskaki & Timon McPhearson & Per Olsson & Owen Gaffney & Kazuhiko Takeuchi & Carl Folke, 2019. "Sustainability and resilience for transformation in the urban century," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 2(4), pages 267-273, April.
    5. Catrien J.A.M. Termeer & Art Dewulf & G. Robbert Biesbroek, 2017. "Transformational change: governance interventions for climate change adaptation from a continuous change perspective," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(4), pages 558-576, April.
    6. Anne M. van Valkengoed & Linda Steg, 2019. "Meta-analyses of factors motivating climate change adaptation behaviour," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 9(2), pages 158-163, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sebastian Seebauer & Eva Posch & Thomas Thaler & Claudia Winkler & Hermine Mitter, 2025. "Under which conditions can shocks stimulate transformative recovery: the Strategy Shock Implementation Reaction (SSIR) framework," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 30(5), pages 1-29, June.
    2. Hassan Danaeefard & Ali Farazmand & Akram Dastyari, 2023. "The Iranian Coronavirus Pandemic (COVID-9) Crisismanship: Understanding the Contributions of National Culture, Media, Technology and Economic System," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 1661-1682, December.
    3. Marina Baroni & Giulia Valdrighi & Andrea Guazzini & Mirko Duradoni, 2025. "Eco-Sensitive Minds: Clustering Readiness to Change and Environmental Sensitivity for Sustainable Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-29, June.
    4. Canan Demir Yıldız, 2025. "Raising Climate Heroes: Ecological Game Camp —A Mixed-Methods Study on Experiential Climate Education in Children and Adults," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-26, September.
    5. Hilary Byerly Flint & Paul Cada & Patricia A. Champ & Jamie Gomez & Danny Margoles & James R. Meldrum & Hannah Brenkert-Smith, 2022. "You vs. us: framing adaptation behavior in terms of private or social benefits," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 174(1), pages 1-17, September.
    6. G. Woo & M. V. Gargiulo & F. Napolitano & O. Amoroso & R. Russo & P. Capuano, 2025. "Public Administration Capacity Building through Exploring Downward Counterfactuals," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 43-60, March.
    7. Heidi E Brown & Erika Austhof & Paula M Luz & Daniel B Ferguson, 2023. "Economics, health, or environment: What motivates individual climate action?," PLOS Climate, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(8), pages 1-16, August.
    8. Stela VALCHOVSKA & Mariya PENEVA, 2021. "Policy Supported Robustness and Adaptation: Implications for the Resilience of Grain Farming in Bulgaria," Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Institute of Agricultural Economics, vol. 18(1), pages 31-46.
    9. Christoph Friedrich & Daniel Feser, 2024. "Combining knowledge bases for small wins in peripheral regions. An analysis of the role of innovation intermediaries in sustainability transitions," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 44(2), pages 211-236, June.
    10. Roberta Ingaramo & Luca Pascale, 2020. "An Interpretative Matrix for an Adaptive Design Approach. Italian School Infrastructure: Safety and Social Restoration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-22, October.
    11. Susana Ferreira, 2024. "Extreme Weather Events and Climate Change: Economic Impacts and Adaptation Policies," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 16(1), pages 207-231, October.
    12. Yusuke Toyoda, 2021. "Survey paper: achievements and perspectives of community resilience approaches to societal systems," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 705-756, October.
    13. Alfred Olfert & Gérard Hutter, 2025. "Strategic Communication and Evaluation to Improve the Capacities of Local Administration for Climate Change Adaptation: A Case Study on Dresden, Germany," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 61-79, March.
    14. Ashi Perveen, 2025. "Bridging the Climate Finance Gap: Behavioral and Market Barriers to Efficient Climate Risk Pricing in Emerging Economies," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(6), pages 6392-6426, June.
    15. Xie, Li & Li, Siyi, 2024. "Climate risk and energy-saving technology innovation: Evidence from Chinese prefecture-level cities," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    16. Thomas Thaler & Patrick A. Witte & Thomas Hartmann & Stan C. M. Geertman, 2021. "Smart Urban Governance for Climate Change Adaptation," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(3), pages 223-226.
    17. John C. Boik, 2020. "Science-Driven Societal Transformation, Part I: Worldview," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-28, August.
    18. Gil-Clavel, Sofia & Wagenblast, Thorid & Filatova, Tatiana, 2023. "Farmers’ Incremental and Transformational Climate Change Adaptation in Different Regions: A Natural Language Processing Comparative Literature Review," SocArXiv 3dp5e, Center for Open Science.
    19. Zhang Jingchao & Koji Kotani & Tatsuyoshi Saijo, 2021. "Are societies becoming proself? A topographical difference under fast urbanization in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(9), pages 12976-12993, September.
    20. Veruska Muccione & Thomas Lontzek & Christian Huggel & Philipp Ott & Nadine Salzmann, 2023. "An application of dynamic programming to local adaptation decision-making," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 119(1), pages 523-544, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:22:p:12459-:d:676897. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.