IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i19p10497-d640389.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Mediating Role of Person-Job Fit between Work-Life Balance (WLB) Practices and Academic Turnover Intentions in India’s Higher Educational Institutions

Author

Listed:
  • Abdul Samad Kakar

    (Department of Management Sciences, University of Loralai, Loralai 84800, Pakistan)

  • Roselina Ahmad Saufi

    (Malaysian Graduate School of Entrepreneurship and Business, Universiti Malaysia Kelantan, Kota Bharu 16100, Malaysia)

  • Babin Dhas Devadhasan

    (Department of Management Studies, Loyola Institute of Technology, Chennai 600123, India)

  • Natanya Meyer

    (DHET-NRF SARChI Entrepreneurship Education, Department of Business Management, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2092, South Africa)

  • Seetharampalayam Chettiannan Vetrivel

    (School of Management Studies, Kongu Engineering College, Erode 638060, India)

  • Róbert Magda

    (Institute of Economics, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, 2100 Gödöllő, Hungary
    Vanderbijlpark Campus, North-West University, Vanderbijlpark 1900, South Africa)

Abstract

This study examines the impact of work-life balance (WLB) practices concerning academics’ turnover intention, person-job fit (PJF), and PJF’s relationship with academics’ intention to leave their jobs. The study further investigates person-job fit as an underlying mechanism of the association between WLB practices and turnover intention. The study’s data were collected through a self-administered questionnaire garnered from 550 full-time academics working in higher educational institutions in South India (Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala, Tamil Nadu, and Telangana, as well as the union territories of Lakshadweep and Puducherry). Partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) was employed for the statistical analysis of the data, using Smart PLS 3.2.8 software. The study ascertained that WLB practices have a negative impact on academics’ turnover intention. Additionally, the study discovered that WLB practices have a positive impact on PJF. Similarly, PJF seems to have a significant negative influence on turnover intention. Moreover, PJF partially and negatively mediates the influence of WLB practices on turnover intention. Consequently, this study suggests implementing several WLB practices (e.g., telecommuting, job sharing, flexitime, paid parental leave, etc.) into higher educational institutions, since it may not only improve academics’ perception of their person-job fit but it may also reduce their turnover intention.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdul Samad Kakar & Roselina Ahmad Saufi & Babin Dhas Devadhasan & Natanya Meyer & Seetharampalayam Chettiannan Vetrivel & Róbert Magda, 2021. "The Mediating Role of Person-Job Fit between Work-Life Balance (WLB) Practices and Academic Turnover Intentions in India’s Higher Educational Institutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-13, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:19:p:10497-:d:640389
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/19/10497/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/19/10497/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Birasnav & S. Rangnekar, 2012. "The role of career management between human capital and interim leadership," Journal of Advances in Management Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 9(1), pages 124-138, May.
    2. Jaehee Park, 2018. "Higher education employees’ self-assessment of person–organization fit: the role of work conditions and job satisfaction," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 55-77, January.
    3. Ioan Lazar & Codruta Osoian & Patricia Ratiu, 2010. "The Role of Work-Life Balance Practices in Order to Improve Organizational Performance," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 201-214.
    4. Fengju Xu & Taslima Akther, 2019. "A Partial Least-Squares Structural Equation Modeling Approach to Investigate the Audit Expectation Gap and Its Impact on Investor Confidence: Perspectives from a Developing Country," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-21, October.
    5. Daniela Converso & Ilaria Sottimano & Giorgia Molinengo & Barbara Loera, 2019. "The Unbearable Lightness of the Academic Work: The Positive and Negative Sides of Heavy Work Investment in a Sample of Italian University Professors and Researchers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jianwan Jing & Jinzhe Yan, 2022. "Study on the Effect of Employees’ Perceived Organizational Support, Psychological Ownership, and Turnover Intention: A Case of China’s Employee," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-18, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Parakandi, Mohammed & Behery, Mohamed, 2016. "Sustainable human resources: Examining the status of organizational work–life balance practices in the United Arab Emirates," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 1370-1379.
    2. Ovidiu Popa-Velea & Liliana Veronica Diaconescu & Iuliana Raluca Gheorghe & Oana Olariu & Iolanda Panaitiu & Mariana Cerniţanu & Ludmila Goma & Irina Nicov & Larisa Spinei, 2019. "Factors Associated with Burnout in Medical Academia: An Exploratory Analysis of Romanian and Moldavian Physicians," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-13, July.
    3. Alina Simona Tecau & Cristinel Petrisor Constantin & Radu Constantin Lixandroiu & Ioana Bianca Chitu & Gabriel Bratucu, 2020. "Impact of the COVID-19 Crisis on Heavy Work Investment in Romania," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 22(Special 1), pages 1049-1049, November.
    4. Jiří Bejtkovský, 2016. "The Age Management philosophy and the concept of Work-life balance in the selected Czech banking institutions," European Journal of Business Science and Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Faculty of Business and Economics, vol. 2(1), pages 32-42.
    5. Lina Vyas & Francis Cheung & Hang-Yue Ngo & Kee-Lee Chou, 2022. "Family-Friendly Policies: Extrapolating A Pathway towards Better Work Attitudes and Work Behaviors in Hong Kong," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-18, October.
    6. Pradhan, Gayatri, 2016. "Work life balance among working women: A cross-cultural review," Working Papers 365, Institute for Social and Economic Change, Bangalore.
    7. Zainab Bello, 2020. "Review of Work-Life Balance Theories," GATR Journals gjbssr573, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    8. Lina Shouman & Antoni Vidal-Suñé & Amado Alarcón Alarcón, 2022. "Impact of Work-Life Balance on Firm Innovativeness: The Different Strategies Used by Male and Female Bosses," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-25, September.
    9. Shawana Fazal & Sobia Masood & Farrukh Nazir & Muhammad Iqbal Majoka, 2022. "Individual and Organizational Strategies for Promoting Work–Life Balance for Sustainable Workforce: A Systematic Literature Review from Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-33, September.
    10. Hongbo Yang & Ping Hu, 2023. "Role of job mobility frequency in job satisfaction changes: the mediation mechanism of job-related social capital and person‒job match," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    11. Marko Milojević & Mariusz Urbański & Ivica Terzić & Valeriy Prasolov, 2020. "Impact of Non-Financial Factors on the Effectiveness of Audits in Energy Companies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-17, November.
    12. Kellyann Berube Kowalski & Alex Aruldoss & Bhuvaneswari Gurumurthy & Satyanarayana Parayitam, 2022. "Work-From-Home Productivity and Job Satisfaction: A Double-Layered Moderated Mediation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-29, September.
    13. Ion Popa & Simona Catalina Stefan & Catalina Florentina Albu & stefan Catalin Popa & Cristian Vlad, 2020. "The Impact of National Culture on Employees' Attitudes Toward Heavy Work Investment: Comparative Approach Romania vs. Japan," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 22(Special 1), pages 1014-1014, November.
    14. Parvaneh Bahrami & Saeed Nosratabadi & Khodayar Palouzian & Szilard Hegedus, 2023. "Modeling the Impact of Mentoring on Women's Work-LifeBalance: A Grounded Theory Approach," Papers 2305.16095, arXiv.org.
    15. Rodica Cristina Butnaru & Alexandru Anichiti & Gina Ionela Butnaru & Alina Petronela Haller, 2020. "Heavy Work Investment from the Perspective of Cultural Factors and Outcomes by Types of Investors," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 22(Special 1), pages 1159-1159, November.
    16. Simone Gounder & Patsy Govender, 2018. "The Moderating Effect of Work-Life Balance on Job Satisfaction," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 10(2), pages 63-73.
    17. José-Luis Godos-Díez & Roberto Fernández-Gago & Laura Cabeza-García, 2019. "How Does Reciprocity Affect Undergraduate Student Orientation towards Stakeholders?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-15, October.
    18. Jing Xiu & Zhenduo Zhang & Zhigang Li & Junwei Zheng, 2019. "How Do Coworkers Aid in Coping with Emotional Exhaustion? An Experience Sampling Method Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-14, August.
    19. M. Isabel Sánchez-Hernández & Óscar Rodrigo González-López & María Buenadicha-Mateos & Juan Luis Tato-Jiménez, 2019. "Work-Life Balance in Great Companies and Pending Issues for Engaging New Generations at Work," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-18, December.
    20. Kapo Wong & Alan H. S. Chan & Pei-Lee Teh, 2020. "How Is Work–Life Balance Arrangement Associated with Organisational Performance? A Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-19, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:19:p:10497-:d:640389. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.