IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i13p7439-d587567.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrated Application of Composted Agricultural Wastes, Chemical Fertilizers and Biofertilizers as an Avenue to Promote Growth, Yield and Quality of Maize in an Arid Agro-Ecosystem

Author

Listed:
  • Nasser Al-Suhaibani

    (Plant Production Department, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia)

  • Mostafa Selim

    (Field Crops Research Department, Agricultural Division, National Research Centre, 33 Bohouth Str., Dokki, Giza 12622, Egypt)

  • Ali Alderfasi

    (Plant Production Department, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia)

  • Salah El-Hendawy

    (Plant Production Department, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
    Agronomy Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Suez Canal University, Ismailia 41522, Egypt)

Abstract

Formulating new integrated plant nutrient management (IPNM) strategies in order to sustain crop production and protect the environment has become an important issue in the present agricultural system. Therefore, a field study was carried out in the two seasons 2016 and 2017 to formulate the best IPNM strategies for improving the growth, yield, and quality of maize grown in an arid agro-ecosystem. The IPNM comprised full-dose NPK (T1); composted agricultural wastes based on cow manure (T2), poultry manure (T3), and a mixture of sheep and camel manure (T4) as activators at the rate of 5 t ha −1 for each; half-dose NPK was combined with the mixture of the three types of composted agricultural wastes at the rate of 5 t ha −1 (T5) or 10 t ha −1 (T6), and a mixture of the three types of composted agricultural wastes at the rate of 10 t ha −1 (T7), 15 t ha −1 (T8), or 20 t ha −1 (T9), either with or without biofertilizers. The results showed that, as compared to T1, T6 or T9 significantly increased different growth, yield, and quality parameters of maize by 11.4–27.3%, 0.8–31.8%, and 4.6–17.2%, while T2 significantly decreased these parameters by 2.2–17.8%, 3.5–16.7%, and 4.5–9.4%, respectively. Seed inoculation with biofertilizers significantly increased different parameters of maize by 1.8–12.9%, compared to that of the non-inoculation seed treatment. Principal component analysis showed a strong relationship between different parameters of maize and treatments T5, T6, T8, and T9 with seed inoculation. Further, a significant and linear relationship was observed between different parameters of maize and the amount of N (R 2 = 0.65–0.77), P (R 2 = 0.58–0.71), and K (R 2 = 0.63–0.73). These results indicated that any IPNM strategies that manage the NPK status and dynamics in the soil are a promising avenue for improving the growth and productivity of maize grown in the arid agro-ecosystem.

Suggested Citation

  • Nasser Al-Suhaibani & Mostafa Selim & Ali Alderfasi & Salah El-Hendawy, 2021. "Integrated Application of Composted Agricultural Wastes, Chemical Fertilizers and Biofertilizers as an Avenue to Promote Growth, Yield and Quality of Maize in an Arid Agro-Ecosystem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-26, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:13:p:7439-:d:587567
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/13/7439/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/13/7439/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Noshin Ilyas & Komal Mumtaz & Nosheen Akhtar & Humaira Yasmin & R. Z. Sayyed & Wajiha Khan & Hesham A. El Enshasy & Daniel J. Dailin & Elsayed A. Elsayed & Zeshan Ali, 2020. "Exopolysaccharides Producing Bacteria for the Amelioration of Drought Stress in Wheat," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-19, October.
    2. Muhammad Hasnain & Jiawei Chen & Nazeer Ahmed & Shumaila Memon & Lei Wang & Yimei Wang & Ping Wang, 2020. "The Effects of Fertilizer Type and Application Time on Soil Properties, Plant Traits, Yield and Quality of Tomato," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-14, October.
    3. Oluwaseun Adeyinka Fasusi & Cristina Cruz & Olubukola Oluranti Babalola, 2021. "Agricultural Sustainability: Microbial Biofertilizers in Rhizosphere Management," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, February.
    4. Venkatesh Paramesh & Shiva Dhar & Anchal Dass & Bipin Kumar & Amit Kumar & Diaa O. El-Ansary & Hosam O. Elansary, 2020. "Role of Integrated Nutrient Management and Agronomic Fortification of Zinc on Yield, Nutrient Uptake and Quality of Wheat," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-12, April.
    5. Shaista Nosheen & Iqra Ajmal & Yuanda Song, 2021. "Microbes as Biofertilizers, a Potential Approach for Sustainable Crop Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    6. Mariangela Diacono & Alessandro Persiani & Elena Testani & Francesco Montemurro & Corrado Ciaccia, 2019. "Recycling Agricultural Wastes and By-products in Organic Farming: Biofertilizer Production, Yield Performance and Carbon Footprint Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-17, July.
    7. Bhattacharyya, Kallol & Das, Tanmay & Ray, Krishnendu & Dutta, Sudarshan & Majumdar, Kaushik & Pari, Arnab & Banerjee, Hirak, 2018. "Yield of and nutrient-water use by maize exposed to moisture stress and K fertilizers in an inceptisol of West Bengal, India," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 31-41.
    8. Yunlong Zhang & Tengteng Li & Honghui Wu & Shuikuan Bei & Junling Zhang & Xiaolin Li, 2019. "Effect of Different Fertilization Practices on Soil Microbial Community in a Wheat–Maize Rotation System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-11, July.
    9. Kit Wayne Chew & Shir Reen Chia & Hong-Wei Yen & Saifuddin Nomanbhay & Yeek-Chia Ho & Pau Loke Show, 2019. "Transformation of Biomass Waste into Sustainable Organic Fertilizers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mashail Nasser Alzain & Naglaa Loutfy & Amany Aboelkassem, 2023. "Effects of Different Kinds of Fertilizers on the Vegetative Growth, Antioxidative Defense System and Mineral Properties of Sunflower Plants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-13, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qu, Zhaoming & Chen, Qi & Feng, Haojie & Hao, Miao & Niu, Guoliang & Liu, Yanli & Li, Chengliang, 2022. "Interactive effect of irrigation and blend ratio of controlled release potassium chloride and potassium chloride on greenhouse tomato production in the Yellow River Basin of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    2. Joseph Jjagwe & Allan John Komakech & Jeninah Karungi & Arabel Amann & Joshua Wanyama & Jakob Lederer, 2019. "Assessment of a Cattle Manure Vermicomposting System Using Material Flow Analysis: A Case Study from Uganda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-17, September.
    3. Le Tran Thanh Liem & Yukihiro Tashiro & Pham Van Trong Tinh & Kenji Sakai, 2022. "Reduction in Greenhouse Gas Emission from Seedless Lime Cultivation Using Organic Fertilizer in a Province in Vietnam Mekong Delta Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-14, May.
    4. Elane Tyara de Jesus Siqueira & Rosane Claudia Rodrigues & José Roberto Brito Freitas & André da Silva Alves & Zinaldo Firmino da Silva & Edmilson Igor Bernardo Almeida & Marcos Gervasio Pereira & D, 2020. "Sugarcane Production Based on Mineral and Organic Nitrogen Fertilizers for Ruminant Feeding," Journal of Agricultural Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 8(2), pages 678-689, June.
    5. Aurelio Ortiz & Estibaliz Sansinenea, 2022. "The Role of Beneficial Microorganisms in Soil Quality and Plant Health," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-13, April.
    6. Fatma Bibi & Asifa Hameed & Noor Muhammad & Khurram Shahzad & Iftikhar Ahmad & Tawaf Ali Shah & Abdel-Rhman Z. Gaafar & Mohamed S. Hodhod & Mohammed Bourhia & Hiba-Allah Nafidi, 2023. "Potential of Integrated Nutrient Management to Rehabilitate the Dieback-Affected Mango Cultivar Sammer Bahisht Chaunsa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-14, July.
    7. Radu Lucian Pânzaru & Daniela Firoiu & George H. Ionescu & Andi Ciobanu & Dragoș Mihai Medelete & Ramona Pîrvu, 2023. "Organic Agriculture in the Context of 2030 Agenda Implementation in European Union Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-31, July.
    8. Teresa Rodríguez-Espinosa & Jose Navarro-Pedreño & Ignacio Gómez Lucas & María Belén Almendro Candel & Ana Pérez Gimeno & Manuel Jordán Vidal & Iliana Papamichael & Antonis A. Zorpas, 2022. "Environmental Risk from Organic Residues," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    9. Qu, Zhaoming & Qi, Xingchao & Liu, Yanli & Liu, Kexin & Li, Chengliang, 2020. "Interactive effect of irrigation and polymer-coated potassium chloride on tomato production in a greenhouse," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    10. TsingHai Wang & Cheng-Di Dong & Jui-Yen Lin & Chiu-Wen Chen & Jo-Shu Chang & Hyunook Kim & Chin-Pao Huang & Chang-Mao Hung, 2021. "Recent Advances in Carbon Dioxide Conversion: A Circular Bioeconomy Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-31, June.
    11. Aseel Najeeb Ajaweed & Fikrat M. Hassan & Nadhem H. Hyder, 2022. "Evaluation of Physio-Chemical Characteristics of Bio Fertilizer Produced from Organic Solid Waste Using Composting Bins," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-12, April.
    12. Swarna Shome & Alak Barman & Zakaria M. Solaiman, 2022. "Rhizobium and Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria Influence the Soil Nutrient Availability, Growth, Yield, and Quality of Soybean," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, July.
    13. Anirban Basu & Priyanka Prasad & Subha Narayan Das & Sadaf Kalam & R. Z. Sayyed & M. S. Reddy & Hesham El Enshasy, 2021. "Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) as Green Bioinoculants: Recent Developments, Constraints, and Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-20, January.
    14. Stephen Okiemute Akpasi & Kigho Moses Oghenejoboh & Hassan Oriyomi Shoyiga & Sammy Lewis Kiambi & Thembisile Patience Mahlangu, 2023. "Investigation of the Nutrient Composition of Fluted Pumpkin ( Telfairia occidentalis ) under Herbicide Treatment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-12, February.
    15. Efthymios Rodias & Eirini Aivazidou & Charisios Achillas & Dimitrios Aidonis & Dionysis Bochtis, 2020. "Water-Energy-Nutrients Synergies in the Agrifood Sector: A Circular Economy Framework," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    16. Xiao, Chao & Zou, Haiyang & Fan, Junliang & Zhang, Fucang & Li, Yi & Sun, Shikun & Pulatov, Alim, 2021. "Optimizing irrigation amount and fertilization rate of drip-fertigated spring maize in northwest China based on multi-level fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    17. Murillo Vetroni Barros & Rômulo Henrique Gomes Jesus & Bruno Silva Ribeiro & Cassiano Moro Piekarski, 2023. "Going in Circles: Key Aspects for Circular Economy Contributions to Agro-industrial Cooperatives," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.
    18. Martina Slámová & Alexandra Kruse & Ingrid Belčáková & Johannes Dreer, 2021. "Old but Not Old Fashioned: Agricultural Landscapes as European Heritage and Basis for Sustainable Multifunctional Farming to Earn a Living," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, April.
    19. Li, Xuechun & Chen, Dan & Cao, Xinchun & Luo, Zhaohui & Webber, Michael, 2020. "Assessing the components of, and factors influencing, paddy rice water footprint in China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    20. Shaista Nosheen & Iqra Ajmal & Yuanda Song, 2021. "Microbes as Biofertilizers, a Potential Approach for Sustainable Crop Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:13:p:7439-:d:587567. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.