IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i12p6678-d573672.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

TEEB-Russia: Towards National Ecosystem Accounting

Author

Listed:
  • Elena Bukvareva

    (Biodiversity Conservation Center, 117312 Moscow, Russia)

  • Karsten Grunewald

    (Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development, 01217 Dresden, Germany)

  • Oxana Klimanova

    (Faculty of Geography, Department of World Physical Geography and Geoecology, Moscow State University, 119991 Moscow, Russia)

  • Evgeni Kolbovsky

    (Faculty of Geography, Department of World Physical Geography and Geoecology, Moscow State University, 119991 Moscow, Russia)

  • Andrey Shcherbakov

    (Faculty of Biology, Department of the Higher Plants, Moscow State University, 119234 Moscow, Russia)

  • Tatiana Sviridova

    (Russian Academy of Sciences, A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, 119071 Moscow, Russia)

  • Dmitry Zamolodchikov

    (Russian Academy of Sciences, Center for Forest Ecology and Productivity, 117997 Moscow, Russia
    Faculty of Geography and Geoinformatics, University of High School of Economics, 101000 Moscow, Russia)

Abstract

Russia’s ecosystems and ecosystem services (ES) are critical not only for the country’s economy and well-being of the people but also for maintaining biodiversity and biosphere regulation around the world. Thus, the introduction of ecosystem accounting in Russia is an urgent national and international goal to which the TEEB-Russia project is dedicated. In this publication, we briefly review and discuss the main project results. Based on currently available open statistical and cartographic data, TEEB-Russia project conducted the first national assessment of terrestrial ES in Russia to derive methodological approaches to national ecosystem accounting. A range of indicators were used to assess the ES provided by ecosystems (potential) as well as the level of demand and consumption of ES by Russia’s regions, both for populations and economies. Indicators of ecosystem assets include extent (ecosystem size) and condition (productivity, phytomass, bird and plant species diversity). An analysis of the correlations between indicators of ES and ecosystem assets showed that a system of national ecosystem accounting in Russia should be regionally differentiated to take account of the strong heterogeneity of natural conditions and the socio-economic development at this level. Decision-making in spatial planning and ecosystem management should carefully consider the difference between causal relationships between indicators and correlations that arise from the simultaneous response of indicators to changes in other factors. Differences in relationships between indicators at different spatial scales should also be taken into account.

Suggested Citation

  • Elena Bukvareva & Karsten Grunewald & Oxana Klimanova & Evgeni Kolbovsky & Andrey Shcherbakov & Tatiana Sviridova & Dmitry Zamolodchikov, 2021. "TEEB-Russia: Towards National Ecosystem Accounting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-26, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:12:p:6678-:d:573672
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/12/6678/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/12/6678/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. Emmett Duffy & Casey M. Godwin & Bradley J. Cardinale, 2017. "Biodiversity effects in the wild are common and as strong as key drivers of productivity," Nature, Nature, vol. 549(7671), pages 261-264, September.
    2. Harrison, P.A. & Berry, P.M. & Simpson, G. & Haslett, J.R. & Blicharska, M. & Bucur, M. & Dunford, R. & Egoh, B. & Garcia-Llorente, M. & Geamănă, N. & Geertsema, W. & Lommelen, E. & Meiresonne, L. &, 2014. "Linkages between biodiversity attributes and ecosystem services: A systematic review," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 9(C), pages 191-203.
    3. Florian D. Schneider & Ulrich Brose & Björn C. Rall & Christian Guill, 2016. "Animal diversity and ecosystem functioning in dynamic food webs," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 7(1), pages 1-8, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bogoni, Juliano André & Peres, Carlos A. & Ferraz, Katia M.P.M.B., 2020. "Effects of mammal defaunation on natural ecosystem services and human well being throughout the entire Neotropical realm," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    2. Hackbart, Vivian C.S. & de Lima, Guilherme T.N.P. & dos Santos, Rozely F., 2017. "Theory and practice of water ecosystem services valuation: Where are we going?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 218-227.
    3. Tonin, Stefania, 2018. "Citizens’ perspectives on marine protected areas as a governance strategy to effectively preserve marine ecosystem services and biodiversity," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 34(PB), pages 189-200.
    4. Nonaka, Etsuko & Kuparinen, Anna, 2023. "Limited effects of size-selective harvesting and harvesting-induced life-history changes on the temporal variability of biomass dynamics in complex food webs," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 476(C).
    5. Ayman Issa & Mohammad A. A. Zaid, 2023. "Firm's biodiversity initiatives disclosure and board gender diversity: A multi‐country analysis of corporations operating in Europe," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4991-5007, November.
    6. María Julieta Arias & Pablo Andrés Vaschetto & Mercedes Marchese & Luciana Regaldo & Ana María Gagneten, 2022. "Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Zooplankton Communities as Ecological Indicators in Urban Wetlands of Argentina," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, March.
    7. Ramel, Cindy & Rey, Pierre-Louis & Fernandes, Rui & Vincent, Claire & Cardoso, Ana R. & Broennimann, Olivier & Pellissier, Loïc & Pradervand, Jean-Nicolas & Ursenbacher, Sylvain & Schmidt, Benedikt R, 2020. "Integrating ecosystem services within spatial biodiversity conservation prioritization in the Alps," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    8. Chen, Haojie, 2020. "Complementing conventional environmental impact assessments of tourism with ecosystem service valuation: A case study of the Wulingyuan Scenic Area, China," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    9. Mengmeng Yang & Simin Wei & Brian N. Mwangi & Shizhong Liu & Jianqiang Huang & Yuelin Li, 2022. "Horizontal Distribution Characteristics and Environmental Factors of Shrubland Species Diversity in Hainan Island, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-15, July.
    10. Dehuan Li & Wei Sun & Fan Xia & Yixuan Yang & Yujing Xie, 2021. "Can Habitat Quality Index Measured Using the InVEST Model Explain Variations in Bird Diversity in an Urban Area?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-27, May.
    11. Diego Peruchi Trevisan & Mayara Herrmann Ruggiero & Polyanna da Conceição Bispo & Dayana Almeida & Maryam Imani & Heiko Balzter & Luiz Eduardo Moschini, 2021. "Evaluation of Environmental Naturalness: A Case Study in the Tietê-Jacaré Hydrographic Basin, São Paulo, Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-18, March.
    12. Jan Brus & Jan Deutscher & Aleš Bajer & Petr Kupec & Lucie Olišarová, 2020. "Monetary Assessment of Restored Habitats as a Support Tool for Sustainable Landscape Management in Lowland Cultural Landscapes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, February.
    13. Pires, Aliny P.F. & Amaral, Aryanne G. & Padgurschi, Maíra C.G. & Joly, Carlos A. & Scarano, Fabio R., 2018. "Biodiversity research still falls short of creating links with ecosystem services and human well-being in a global hotspot," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 34(PA), pages 68-73.
    14. Juutinen, Artti & Tolvanen, Anne & Saarimaa, Miia & Ojanen, Paavo & Sarkkola, Sakari & Ahtikoski, Anssi & Haikarainen, Soili & Karhu, Jouni & Haara, Arto & Nieminen, Mika & Penttilä, Timo & Nousiainen, 2020. "Cost-effective land-use options of drained peatlands– integrated biophysical-economic modeling approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    15. Jonathan S. Lefcheck & Graham J. Edgar & Rick D. Stuart-Smith & Amanda E. Bates & Conor Waldock & Simon J. Brandl & Stuart Kininmonth & Scott D. Ling & J. Emmett Duffy & Douglas B. Rasher & Aneil F. A, 2021. "Species richness and identity both determine the biomass of global reef fish communities," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-9, December.
    16. André Fonseca & Vera Zina & Gonçalo Duarte & Francisca C. Aguiar & Patricia María Rodríguez-González & Maria Teresa Ferreira & Maria Rosário Fernandes, 2021. "Riparian Ecological Infrastructures: Potential for Biodiversity-Related Ecosystem Services in Mediterranean Human-Dominated Landscapes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-21, September.
    17. Mervin Ogawa & Joseph Anthony L. Reyes, 2021. "Assessment of Regional Fisheries Management Organizations Efforts toward the Precautionary Approach and Science-Based Stock Management and Compliance Measures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-24, July.
    18. Mayer, Andreas & Kaufmann, Lisa & Kalt, Gerald & Matej, Sarah & Theurl, Michaela C. & Morais, Tiago G. & Leip, Adrian & Erb, Karl-Heinz, 2021. "Applying the Human Appropriation of Net Primary Production framework to map provisioning ecosystem services and their relation to ecosystem functioning across the European Union," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    19. Linney, G.N. & Henrys, P.A. & Blackburn, G.A. & Maskell, L.C. & Harrison, P.A., 2020. "A visualization platform to analyze contextual links between natural capital and ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    20. Kubiszewski, Ida & Concollato, Luke & Costanza, Robert & Stern, David I., 2023. "Changes in authorship, networks, and research topics in ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:12:p:6678-:d:573672. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.