IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2020i1p287-d472522.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of the Level of Personnel Work in the Czech Republic and Slovakia

Author

Listed:
  • Lukáš Smerek

    (Faculty of Economics, Matej Bel University, Tajovského 10, 975 90 Banská Bystrica, Slovakia)

  • Milota Vetráková

    (Faculty of Economics, Matej Bel University, Tajovského 10, 975 90 Banská Bystrica, Slovakia)

  • Šárka Čemerková

    (School of Business Administration in Karvina, Silesian University, Univerzitní Náměstí 1934/3733, 733 40 Karviná, Czech Republic)

  • Vojtěch Malátek

    (School of Business Administration in Karvina, Silesian University, Univerzitní Náměstí 1934/3733, 733 40 Karviná, Czech Republic)

Abstract

After 1989, the countries of Eastern and Central Europe began to undergo significant social and economic changes associated with the process of transformation of the economy into a market economy. Transformation is not only associated with the creation of a business environment, with the formation of new legal and institutional mechanisms, but also with a change in the thinking and behavior of people including employees, managers and owners. The paper aims to identify important processes and trends in developing human resource management in companies in the Czech Republic and the Slovak Republic. We conducted the questionnaire survey in 2018 and 2019 in various areas of business. We obtained the opinions of respondents from 1542 companies. In the research, we assume that in the conditions of a market economy compared to a centrally managed economy, employees are the most important source of development and performance of companies. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the sampling unit. The other methods used to evaluate data in the paper were the Mann-Whitney test and Spearman Correlation coefficient. The research revealed that despite a long common history, differences in the field of personnel work have arisen in the last 20 years of the independent existence of the Czech Republic and the Slovak Republic. The only exception is employee care. It was also found that in the Czech Republic the strategic orientation predominates, on the contrary, companies in the Slovak Republic focused on operational processes. Differences were also found in the way of adaptation and further training of employees. The results of the findings can be used to design processes with the highest positive impact on business performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Lukáš Smerek & Milota Vetráková & Šárka Čemerková & Vojtěch Malátek, 2020. "Comparison of the Level of Personnel Work in the Czech Republic and Slovakia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2020:i:1:p:287-:d:472522
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/1/287/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/1/287/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael J. Morley & Noreen Heraty, 2019. "The Anatomy of an International Research Collaboration: Building Cumulative Comparative Knowledge in Human Resource Management," International Studies of Management & Organization, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(4), pages 341-354, October.
    2. Misbah Habib & Jawad Abbas & Rahat Noman, 2019. "Are human capital, intellectual property rights, and research and development expenditures really important for total factor productivity? An empirical analysis," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 46(6), pages 756-774, February.
    3. Juil Lee & Sangsoon Kim & Jiman Lee & Sungok Moon, 2019. "Enhancing Employee Creativity for A Sustainable Competitive Advantage through Perceived Human Resource Management Practices and Trust in Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, April.
    4. Emil Knezović & Senad Bušatlić & Ognjen Riđić, 2020. "Strategic human resource management in small and medium enterprises," International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 20(2), pages 114-139.
    5. Marian Rizov & Richard Croucher, 2009. "Human resource management and performance in European firms," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 33(2), pages 253-272, March.
    6. Fida Afiouni, 2013. "Human capital management: a new name for HRM?," International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(1), pages 18-34.
    7. Samuel Roscoe & Nachiappan Subramanian & Charbel J.C. Jabbour & Tao Chong, 2019. "Green human resource management and the enablers of green organisational culture: Enhancing a firm's environmental performance for sustainable development," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(5), pages 737-749, July.
    8. Sonnenberg, Mariëlle & van Zijderveld, Vera & Brinks, Martijn, 2014. "The role of talent-perception incongruence in effective talent management," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 272-280.
    9. Abdul Waheed & Xiaoming Miao & Salma Waheed & Naveed Ahmad & Abdul Majeed, 2019. "How New HRM Practices, Organizational Innovation, and Innovative Climate Affect the Innovation Performance in the IT Industry: A Moderated-Mediation Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-21, January.
    10. Silvia Lorincová & Miloš Hitka & Peter Štarchoň & Katarína Stachová, 2018. "Strategic Instrument for Sustainability of Human Resource Management in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Using Management Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-25, October.
    11. Miloš Hitka & Alžbeta Kucharčíková & Peter Štarchoň & Žaneta Balážová & Michal Lukáč & Zdenko Stacho, 2019. "Knowledge and Human Capital as Sustainable Competitive Advantage in Human Resource Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-18, September.
    12. Lu Zhang & Xiaochao Guo & Zhimei Lei & Ming K. Lim, 2019. "Social Network Analysis of Sustainable Human Resource Management from the Employee Training’s Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-20, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Milota Vetráková & Lukáš Smerek & Katarzyna Włodarczyk & Ewa Mazur-Wierzbicka & Sandra Misiak-Kwit, 2021. "The implementation of personnel processes in Poland and Slovakia," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(4), pages 148-163, June.
    2. E.V. Orlova, 2021. "Assessment of the Human Capital of an Enterprise and its Management in the Context of the Digital Transformation of the Economy," Journal of Applied Economic Research, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 20(4), pages 666-700.
    3. Berkery, Elaine & Morley, Michael J. & Tiernan, Siobhán & Peretz, Hilla, 2020. "From start to finish: Flexi-time as a social exchange and its impact on organizational outcomes," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 591-601.
    4. Shu Yu & Shuangshuang Zhang & Takaya Yuizono, 2021. "Exploring the Influences of Innovation Climate and Resource Endowments through Two Types of University–Industry Collaborative Activities on Regional Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-20, July.
    5. Rana Muhammad Shahid Yaqub & Aneeta Rehman & Shakeela Kausar & Zakariya Hassan Qureshi, 2022. "Insights from Theory of Reason Action to Determine the Faculty Turn-Over Intentions in HEI’s of Southern Punjab: Mediating and Moderating Role of Perceived Organizational Justice and Organizational ," iRASD Journal of Management, International Research Alliance for Sustainable Development (iRASD), vol. 4(2), pages 375-389, june.
    6. Mubashir Ahmad Aukhoon & Junaid Iqbal & Zahoor Ahmad Parray, 2024. "Impact of corporate social responsibility on employee green behavior: Role of green human resource management practices and employee green culture," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 3768-3778, September.
    7. Farzana Riva & Solon Magrizos & Mohammad Rabiul Basher Rubel, 2021. "Investigating the link between managers' green knowledge and leadership style, and their firms' environmental performance: The mediation role of green creativity," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 3228-3240, November.
    8. Ehsan Namdar Joyami & Nour Mohammad Yaghoubi & Seyed AliGholi Rowshan, 2024. "Quality Management and Environmental Management: Role of Knowledge Transfer and Organizational Innovation in Knowledge-Based Firms," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 8457-8494, June.
    9. Shao-Long Li & Fang Sun & Mingze Li, 2019. "Sustainable Human Resource Management Nurtures Change-Oriented Employees: Relationship between High-Commitment Work Systems and Employees’ Taking Charge Behaviors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-15, June.
    10. Alamzeb Aamir & Sharif Ullah Jan & Abdul Qadus & Abdelmohsen A. Nassani & Mohamed Haffar, 2021. "Impact of Knowledge Sharing on Sustainable Performance: Mediating Role of Employee’s Ambidexterity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-13, November.
    11. Skuza Agnieszka & Woldu Habte G. & Alborz Shawn, 2022. "Who is talent? Implications of talent definitions for talent management practice," Economics and Business Review, Sciendo, vol. 8(4), pages 136-162, December.
    12. Sergey Evgenievich Barykin & Larisa Nikolaevna Borisoglebskaya & Vyacheslav Vasilyevich Provotorov & Irina Vasilievna Kapustina & Sergey Mikhailovich Sergeev & Elena De La Poza Plaza & Lilya Saychenko, 2021. "Sustainability of Management Decisions in a Digital Logistics Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-17, August.
    13. Liaqat Ali & Naveed Akhtar, 2024. "The Effectiveness of Export, FDI, Human Capital, and R&D on Total Factor Productivity Growth: the Case of Pakistan," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 3085-3099, March.
    14. Muhammad Jawad & Munazza Naz, 2024. "Financial Technological Innovation, Sustainable Operations, and Efficiency: a Study of SMBs in Times of Crisis," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 13160-13181, September.
    15. Dharm Dev Bhatta & Muddassar Sarfraz & Larisa Ivascu & Marius Pislaru, 2023. "The Nexus of Corporate Affinity for Technology and Firm Sustainable Performance in the Era of Digitalization: A Mediated Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-20, June.
    16. Ana Teresa Ferreira-Oliveira & José Keating & Isabel Silva, 2020. "Sustainable HRM as a Pathway to Sustainability—HRMS Relevance on Affective Commitment through Organizational Trust," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-27, November.
    17. Ergün Kara & Melda Akbaba & Emre Yakut & Makbule Hürmet Çetinel & Mehmet Mert Pasli, 2023. "The Mediating Effect of Green Human Resources Management on the Relationship between Organizational Sustainability and Innovative Behavior: An Application in Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-16, January.
    18. Mathushan P & Kengatharan N, 2022. "Human Resource Management Practices And Firm Innovation: Mediating Role Of Human Capital," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(2), pages 25-36, June.
    19. Croucher, Richard & Rizov, Marian, 2015. "MNEs and flexible working practices in Mauritius," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 26(21), pages 2701-2717.
    20. Taiwen Feng & Hongyan Sheng, 2023. "Identifying the equifinal configurations of prompting green supply chain integration and subsequent performance outcome," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5234-5251, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2020:i:1:p:287-:d:472522. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.