IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i8p3397-d348669.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Novel Composite Materials for Lake Restoration: A New Approach Impacting on Ecology and Circular Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Miltiadis Zamparas

    (School of Science and Technology, Hellenic Open University, Parodos Aristotelous 18, 26335 Patras, Greece)

  • Grigorios L. Kyriakopoulos

    (Electric Power Division, Photometry Laboratory, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 15780 Athens, Greece)

  • Marios Drosos

    (Institute of Resource, Ecosystem and Environment of Agriculture (IREEA), Faculty of Biology and Environment, Nanjing Agricultural University, 1 Weigang Road, Nanjing 210095, China)

  • Vasilis C. Kapsalis

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, Industrial Management and Operations Research Sector, National Technical University of Athens, 9 Heroon Polytechniou Street, 15780 Athens, Greece)

  • Ioannis K. Kalavrouziotis

    (School of Science and Technology, Hellenic Open University, Parodos Aristotelous 18, 26335 Patras, Greece)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to promote a new way of application composite materials to restore eutrophic waters. A new sustainable way of application is based on the “teabag” method, in which materials were placed in water-permeable bags and immersed in the water column in order to sorb phosphate—one of the main contributory element for the eutrophication problem. Particularly, the two composites materials of Phoslock™ (lanthanum-modified bentonite, LMB) and Bephos™ (Fe-modified bentonite, f-MB) were tested and bench-scale batch experiments were employed to investigate their sorption efficiency in the forms of slurry and teabag. The adsorption kinetics and the relevant adsorption isotherms were deployed, while the effect of the materials on turbidity and their aging were also investigated. Experimental results showed that Phoslock™ and Bephos™ (as teabag), being applied at initial concentration range: 0.05–5 mg/L, they sustained a maximum adsorption capacity of 7.80 mg/g and 25.1 mg/g, respectively, which are considered sufficient rates for P concentrations reported at natural aquatic ecosystems. At the same time this new method did not cause turbidity in the water column, since the material was not released into the water, thus, preventing potential harmful consequences for the living organisms. Moreover, the “teabag” method prevents the material to cover the lake bottom, avoiding the phenomenon of smothering of benthos. Βy teabag method, the materials can be collected for further applicability as soil improver or crops fertilizer. Finally, it was argued that the possibility to recycle LMB and f-MB materials for agricultural use is of paramount importance, sustaining also positive impacts on sustainable ecology and on the routes of circular economy (CE).

Suggested Citation

  • Miltiadis Zamparas & Grigorios L. Kyriakopoulos & Marios Drosos & Vasilis C. Kapsalis & Ioannis K. Kalavrouziotis, 2020. "Novel Composite Materials for Lake Restoration: A New Approach Impacting on Ecology and Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:8:p:3397-:d:348669
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/8/3397/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/8/3397/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grigorios L. Kyriakopoulos & Vasilis C. Kapsalis & Konstantinos G. Aravossis & Miltiadis Zamparas & Alexandros Mitsikas, 2019. "Evaluating Circular Economy under a Multi-Parametric Approach: A Technological Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-24, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jinjin Gu & Yuan Cao & Min Wu & Min Song & Lin Wang, 2022. "A Novel Method for Watershed Best Management Practices Spatial Optimal Layout under Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-18, October.
    2. Michalis Skordoulis & Grigorios Kyriakopoulos & Stamatiοs Ntanos & Spyros Galatsidas & Garyfallos Arabatzis & Miltiadis Chalikias & Petros Kalantonis, 2022. "The Mediating Role of Firm Strategy in the Relationship between Green Entrepreneurship, Green Innovation, and Competitive Advantage: The Case of Medium and Large-Sized Firms in Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Xiaobin & Chu, Zhaofang & Ren, Lei & Xing, Jianguo, 2023. "Open innovation and sustainable competitive advantage: The role of organizational learning," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PA).
    2. Do, Quynh & Ramudhin, Amar & Colicchia, Claudia & Creazza, Alessandro & Li, Dong, 2021. "A systematic review of research on food loss and waste prevention and management for the circular economy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    3. Zając, P. & Avdiushchenko, A., 2020. "The impact of converting waste into resources on the regional economy, evidence from Poland," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 437(C).
    4. Dalia Streimikiene & Grigorios L. Kyriakopoulos & Vidas Lekavicius & Indre Siksnelyte-Butkiene, 2021. "Energy Poverty and Low Carbon Just Energy Transition: Comparative Study in Lithuania and Greece," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 319-371, November.
    5. Mattia Cottes & Matia Mainardis & Patrizia Simeoni, 2023. "Assessing the Techno-Economic Feasibility of Waste Electric and Electronic Equipment Treatment Plant: A Multi-Decisional Modeling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-16, November.
    6. Deniz Ikiz Kaya & Nadia Pintossi & Gamze Dane, 2021. "An Empirical Analysis of Driving Factors and Policy Enablers of Heritage Adaptive Reuse within the Circular Economy Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-24, February.
    7. Damián Burneo & José M. Cansino & Rocio Yñiguez, 2020. "Environmental and Socioeconomic Impacts of Urban Waste Recycling as Part of Circular Economy. The Case of Cuenca (Ecuador)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-22, April.
    8. Mark Anthony Camilleri, 2021. "Sustainable Production and Consumption of Food. Mise-en-Place Circular Economy Policies and Waste Management Practices in Tourism Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-13, September.
    9. Skare, Marinko & Porada-Rochoń, Małgorzata, 2022. "Technology and social equality in the United States," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    10. Anna Rolewicz-Kalińska & Krystyna Lelicińska-Serafin & Piotr Manczarski, 2020. "The Circular Economy and Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste Recycling Strategies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-20, August.
    11. Mariano González-Sánchez & Juan Luis Martín-Ortega, 2020. "Greenhouse Gas Emissions Growth in Europe: A Comparative Analysis of Determinants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-22, January.
    12. Manal Hamam & Gaetano Chinnici & Giuseppe Di Vita & Gioacchino Pappalardo & Biagio Pecorino & Giulia Maesano & Mario D’Amico, 2021. "Circular Economy Models in Agro-Food Systems: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-18, March.
    13. Vítor Domingues Martinho & Paulo Reis Mourão, 2020. "Circular Economy and Economic Development in the European Union: A Review and Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-25, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:8:p:3397-:d:348669. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.