IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i8p3161-d345413.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reflexive Skills in Teacher Education: A Tweet a Week

Author

Listed:
  • Adolfina Pérez Garcias

    (Department of Applied Pedagogy and Psychology of Education, Faculty of Education, University of Balearic Islands, 07122 Mallorca, Spain)

  • Gemma Tur

    (Department of Applied Pedagogy and Psychology of Education, Faculty of Education, University of Balearic Islands, 07800 Eivissa, Spain)

  • Antònia Darder Mesquida

    (Department of Applied Pedagogy and Psychology of Education, Faculty of Education, University of Balearic Islands, 07122 Mallorca, Spain)

  • Victoria I. Marín

    (Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Education and Social Sciences, University of Oldenburg, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany)

Abstract

Social media has been broadly used in the context of higher education for educational purposes due to students’ familiarity with this type of communication. As one of the most interesting cases, Twitter has often been used in teacher education for many purposes. One of the most unexplored themes is using Twitter for reflexive aims, in which discussions featuring ambiguous and contradictory results about whether the characteristics of such a short format can promote reflexive writing. This study is aimed at contributing to this research gap and explores the possibilities of using Twitter for reflective aims in teacher education, considering the reflective level of students’ tweets and students’ perceptions after engaging on Twitter. For the evaluation of this reflection, a content analysis of tweets texts and emojis has been carried out by coding their content and developing an instrument to assess their reflective level. Additionally, perceptions of students have been collected through an online survey. This study is embedded in a design-based research process that is already in its fourth cycle. Findings show that most tweets are descriptive or analytical, and that tweets are mainly text-based. Furthermore, the data show that low-level reflective tweets may include emojis, which are mainly positive and located at the end of a tweet. The conclusions suggest that Twitter could be more useful when reflections are made during learning rather than on learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Adolfina Pérez Garcias & Gemma Tur & Antònia Darder Mesquida & Victoria I. Marín, 2020. "Reflexive Skills in Teacher Education: A Tweet a Week," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:8:p:3161-:d:345413
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/8/3161/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/8/3161/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Coeckelbergh, Mark, 2018. "Technology and the good society: A polemical essay on social ontology, political principles, and responsibility for technology," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 4-9.
    2. Petra Kralj Novak & Jasmina Smailović & Borut Sluban & Igor Mozetič, 2015. "Sentiment of Emojis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. de Neufville, Robert & Baum, Seth D., 2021. "Collective action on artificial intelligence: A primer and review," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    2. Mao, Caixia & Koide, Ryu & Brem, Alexander & Akenji, Lewis, 2020. "Technology foresight for social good: Social implications of technological innovation by 2050 from a Global Expert Survey," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    3. Sætra, Henrik Skaug, 2019. "When nudge comes to shove: Liberty and nudging in the era of big data," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    4. Anand, Abhinav & Pathak, Jalaj, 2022. "The role of Reddit in the GameStop short squeeze," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    5. Carlos Henríquez Miranda & German Sanchez-Torres & Dixon Salcedo, 2023. "Exploring the Evolution of Sentiment in Spanish Pandemic Tweets: A Data Analysis Based on a Fine-Tuned BERT Architecture," Data, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-18, May.
    6. Oriol J. Bosch & Melanie Revilla, 2021. "Using emojis in mobile web surveys for Millennials? A study in Spain and Mexico," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 39-61, February.
    7. Das, Gopal & Wiener, Hillary J.D. & Kareklas, Ioannis, 2019. "To emoji or not to emoji? Examining the influence of emoji on consumer reactions to advertising," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 147-156.
    8. Ganga S. Urumutta Hewage & Yue Liu & Ze Wang & Huifang Mao, 2021. "Consumer responses toward symmetric versus asymmetric facial expression emojis," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 219-230, June.
    9. Manuel-Jesús Perea-Rodríguez & Juan-Agustín Morón-Marchena & María-Carmen Muñoz-Díaz & David Cobos-Sanchiz, 2021. "Adult Education: A Sustainable Model for the Reduction of Psychosocial and Educational Risks Caused by COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-12, May.
    10. Vesnic-Alujevic, Lucia & Nascimento, Susana & Pólvora, Alexandre, 2020. "Societal and ethical impacts of artificial intelligence: Critical notes on European policy frameworks," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(6).
    11. Ho, Manh-Tung & Mantello, Peter & Ghotbi, Nader & Nguyen, Minh-Hoang & Nguyen, Hong-Kong T. & Vuong, Quan-Hoang, 2022. "Rethinking technological acceptance in the age of emotional AI: Surveying Gen Z (Zoomer) attitudes toward non-conscious data collection," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    12. Klostermann, Jan & Plumeyer, Anja & Böger, Daniel & Decker, Reinhold, 2018. "Extracting brand information from social networks: Integrating image, text, and social tagging data," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 538-556.
    13. Sætra, Henrik Skaug, 2020. "The foundations of a policy for the use of social robots in care," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    14. Sanchis, Raúl G., 2023. "Towards a general equilibrium theory of allocation of time for the digital revolution era," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    15. Ponce, Pedro & Peffer, Therese & Molina, Arturo & Barcena, Sergio, 2020. "Social creation networks for designing low income interfaces in programmable thermostats," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    16. Jennifer Fane & Colin MacDougall & Jessie Jovanovic & Gerry Redmond & Lisa Gibbs, 2020. "Preschool Aged Children’s Accounts of their Own Wellbeing: are Current Wellbeing Indicators Applicable to Young Children?," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 13(6), pages 1893-1920, December.
    17. Jiamin Pei & Le Cheng, 2022. "Deciphering emoji variation in courts: a social semiotic perspective," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-8, December.
    18. Hudson, Marc, 2018. "Ending technocracy with a neologism? Avivocracy as a conceptual tool," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 136-139.
    19. Béatrice BOULU-RESHEF & Catherine BRUNEAU & Maxime NICOLAS & Thomas RENAULT, 2022. "An Experimental Analysis of Investor Sentiment," LEO Working Papers / DR LEO 2940, Orleans Economics Laboratory / Laboratoire d'Economie d'Orleans (LEO), University of Orleans.
    20. Boada, Júlia Pareto & Maestre, Begoña Román & Genís, Carme Torras, 2021. "The ethical issues of social assistive robotics: A critical literature review," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:8:p:3161-:d:345413. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.