IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i6p2239-d331982.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recognition of Landscape Key Areas in a Coal Mine Area of a Semi-Arid Steppe in China: A Case Study of Yimin Open-Pit Coal Mine

Author

Listed:
  • Shougang Wang

    (School of Environment Science and Spatial Informatics, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Jiu Huang

    (School of Environment Science and Spatial Informatics, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
    Engineering Research Center of Mine Ecological Construction, Ministry of Education, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Haochen Yu

    (School of Environment Science and Spatial Informatics, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
    Engineering Research Center of Mine Ecological Construction, Ministry of Education, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Chuning Ji

    (School of Environment Science and Spatial Informatics, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

Abstract

The ecological integrity and biodiversity of steppes were destroyed under the long-term and high-intensity development of open-pit coal mines in China, causing desertification, steppe degradation, landscape function defect, and so on. As a source of species maintenance and dispersal, an ecological source is a key area for preservation in order to restore the ecological security pattern of the larger landscape. The purpose of this study was to establish a landscape key area recognition model to identify the landscape key areas (LKA) surrounding an open pit coalmine located in semi-arid steppe. This study takes the Yimin open pit mining area as a case study. We assessed Landsat 5 Thematic Mapper (TM) and Landsat 8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) remote sensing images taken during the peak season of vegetation growth from July to August in 1999, 2006, 2011, and 2017. From these images, we identified the main landscape types and vegetation coverage grades in order to identify the ecological land. Next, we applied the three indices of Importance of Patch Connectivity, Habitat Quality, and Ecosystem Service Value to calculate the comprehensive results that identify ecological land. Finally, the ecological land quality results of different years are superimposed and averaged, and then Very Important Patch (VIMP), Important Patch (IMP), and General Patch (GEP) areas were used for LKA extraction. Our results showed LKA to cover 177.35 km 2 , accounting for 20.01% of the total study area. The landscape types identified as LKA are primarily grassland (47.37%), wetland (40.27%), and shrubland (11.88%), indicating that landscape type correlates strongly with its value as a landscape key area. The proposed landscape key area recognition model could enrich the foundations for ecological planning and ecological security pattern construction in order to support ecological protection and restoration in semi-arid steppe areas affected by coal mining.

Suggested Citation

  • Shougang Wang & Jiu Huang & Haochen Yu & Chuning Ji, 2020. "Recognition of Landscape Key Areas in a Coal Mine Area of a Semi-Arid Steppe in China: A Case Study of Yimin Open-Pit Coal Mine," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-22, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:6:p:2239-:d:331982
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/6/2239/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/6/2239/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mwitwa, J. & German, L. & Muimba-Kankolongo, A. & Puntodewo, A., 2012. "Governance and sustainability challenges in landscapes shaped by mining: Mining-forestry linkages and impacts in the Copper Belt of Zambia and the DR Congo," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 19-30.
    2. Lin Chu & Tiancheng Sun & Tianwei Wang & Zhaoxia Li & Chongfa Cai, 2018. "Evolution and Prediction of Landscape Pattern and Habitat Quality Based on CA-Markov and InVEST Model in Hubei Section of Three Gorges Reservoir Area (TGRA)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-28, October.
    3. Daowei Zhang & Anne Stenger, 2015. "Value and valuation of forest ecosystem services," Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(2), pages 129-140, July.
    4. Haiming Yan & Jinyan Zhan & Bing Liu & Yongwei Yuan, 2014. "Model Estimation of Water Use Efficiency for Soil Conservation in the Lower Heihe River Basin, Northwest China during 2000–2008," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(9), pages 1-17, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zeke Lian & Huichao Hao & Jing Zhao & Kaizhong Cao & Hesong Wang & Zhechen He, 2022. "Evaluation of Remote Sensing Ecological Index Based on Soil and Water Conservation on the Effectiveness of Management of Abandoned Mine Landscaping Transformation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-15, August.
    2. Haochen Yu & Jiu Huang & Chuning Ji & Zi’ao Li, 2021. "Construction of a Landscape Ecological Network for a Large-Scale Energy and Chemical Industrial Base: A Case Study of Ningdong, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-24, March.
    3. Yifan Shen & Qi Li & Xiangjun Pei & Renjie Wei & Bingmei Yang & Ningfei Lei & Xiaochao Zhang & Daqiu Yin & Shijun Wang & Qizhong Tao, 2023. "Ecological Restoration of Engineering Slopes in China—A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-17, March.
    4. Carlos J. Pardo Abad & José Fernández Álvarez, 2020. "Landscape as Digital Content and a Smart Tourism Resource in the Mining Area of Cartagena-La Unión (Spain)," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-21, April.
    5. Huiqin Lian & Haiyang Yi & Yi Yang & Bin Wu & Rui Wang, 2021. "Impact of Coal Mining on the Moisture Movement in a Vadose Zone in Open-Pit Mine Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qian Zhou & Feng Gui & Benxuan Zhao & Jingyi Liu & Huiwen Cai & Kaida Xu & Sheng Zhao, 2024. "Examining the Social Costs of Carbon Emissions and the Ecosystem Service Value in Island Ecosystems: An Analysis of the Zhoushan Archipelago," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-19, January.
    2. Lin Chu & Tiancheng Sun & Tianwei Wang & Zhaoxia Li & Chongfa Cai, 2020. "Temporal and Spatial Heterogeneity of Soil Erosion and a Quantitative Analysis of its Determinants in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-20, November.
    3. Fangfang Xun & Yecui Hu & Ling Lv & Jinhui Tong, 2017. "Farmers’ Awareness of Ecosystem Services and the Associated Policy Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-13, September.
    4. Lili Zhang & Baoqing Hu & Ze Zhang & Gaodou Liang & Simin Huang, 2023. "Comprehensive Evaluation of Ecological-Economic Value of Guangxi Based on Land Consolidation," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-25, March.
    5. Médard Mpanda Mukenza & Héritier Khoji Muteya & Dieu-Donné N’Tambwe Nghonda & Kouagou Raoul Sambiéni & François Malaisse & Sylvestre Cabala Kaleba & Jan Bogaert & Yannick Useni Sikuzani, 2022. "Uncontrolled Exploitation of Pterocarpus tinctorius Welw. and Associated Landscape Dynamics in the Kasenga Territory: Case of the Rural Area of Kasomeno (DR Congo)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-14, September.
    6. Xinmin Zhang & Hualin Xie & Jiaying Shi & Tiangui Lv & Caihua Zhou & Wangda Liu, 2020. "Assessing Changes in Ecosystem Service Values in Response to Land Cover Dynamics in Jiangxi Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-15, April.
    7. Shuangshuang Liu & Qipeng Liao & Mingzhu Xiao & Dengyue Zhao & Chunbo Huang, 2022. "Spatial and Temporal Variations of Habitat Quality and Its Response of Landscape Dynamic in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-20, March.
    8. Josset, Clement & Shanafelt, David W. & Abildtrup, Jens & Stenger, Anne, 2023. "Probabilistic typology of private forest owners: A tool to target the development of new market for ecosystem services," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    9. Yu Zhang & Pengcheng Wang & Tianwei Wang & Jingwei Li & Zhaoxia Li & Mingjun Teng & Yunbing Gao, 2020. "Using Vegetation Indices to Characterize Vegetation Cover Change in the Urban Areas of Southern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-18, November.
    10. Anne Stenger & Patrice Harou, 2015. "Special issue on forest investments profitability," Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(2), pages 125-128, July.
    11. Héritier Khoji Muteya & Dieu-Donné N’Tambwe Nghonda & François Malaisse & Salomon Waselin & Kouagou Raoul Sambiéni & Sylvestre Cabala Kaleba & François Munyemba Kankumbi & Jean-François Bastin & Jan B, 2022. "Quantification and Simulation of Landscape Anthropization around the Mining Agglomerations of Southeastern Katanga (DR Congo) between 1979 and 2090," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-17, June.
    12. Yuhan Yu & Mengmeng Yu & Lu Lin & Jiaxin Chen & Dongjie Li & Wenting Zhang & Kai Cao, 2019. "National Green GDP Assessment and Prediction for China Based on a CA-Markov Land Use Simulation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-19, January.
    13. Shanshan Xu & Qinghe Zhao & Shengyan Ding & Mingzhou Qin & Lixin Ning & Xiaoyu Ji, 2018. "Improving Soil and Water Conservation of Riparian Vegetation Based on Landscape Leakiness and Optimal Vegetation Pattern," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-16, May.
    14. Wei Guo & Yongjia Teng & Yueguan Yan & Chuanwu Zhao & Wanqiu Zhang & Xianglin Ji, 2022. "Simulation of Land Use and Carbon Storage Evolution in Multi-Scenario: A Case Study in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Urban Agglomeration, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-19, October.
    15. Dinghua Ou & Qi Zhang & Yijie Wu & Jing Qin & Jianguo Xia & Ouping Deng & Xuesong Gao & Jinhu Bian & Shangqi Gong, 2021. "Construction of a Territorial Space Classification System Based on Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity of Land Use and Its Superior Territorial Space Functions and Their Dynamic Coupling: Case Study on Qiong," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-27, August.
    16. Ruibing Meng & Jiale Cai & Hui Xin & Zhongju Meng & Xiaohong Dang & Yanlong Han, 2023. "Spatio-Temporal Changes in Land Use and Habitat Quality of Hobq Desert along the Yellow River Section," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-24, February.
    17. Ting Li & Donghui Shi & Shuguang Jiang & Yu Li & Huilu Yu, 2024. "Analysis of Spatial—Temporal Variation in Ecosystem Service Value in Shandong Province over the Last Two Decades," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-15, January.
    18. Ziyong Su & Zhanqi Wang & Liguo Zhang, 2022. "Spatial-Temporal Characteristics of Ecosystem Service Values of Watershed and Ecological Compensation Scheme Considering Its Realization in Spatial Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-17, July.
    19. Ruijie Zhang & Kanhua Yu & Pingping Luo, 2024. "Spatio-Temporal Relationship between Land Use Carbon Emissions and Ecosystem Service Value in Guanzhong, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, January.
    20. Yi Shang & Dongyan Wang & Shuhan Liu & Hong Li, 2022. "Spatial-Temporal Variation and Mechanisms Causing Spatial Differentiation of Ecosystem Services in Ecologically Fragile Regions Based on Value Evaluation: A Case Study of Western Jilin, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-21, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:6:p:2239-:d:331982. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.