IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i15p9750-d882805.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Remote Sensing Ecological Index Based on Soil and Water Conservation on the Effectiveness of Management of Abandoned Mine Landscaping Transformation

Author

Listed:
  • Zeke Lian

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forest University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Huichao Hao

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forest University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Jing Zhao

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forest University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Kaizhong Cao

    (School of Theater, Film and Television, Communication University of China, Beijing 100024, China)

  • Hesong Wang

    (School of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forest University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Zhechen He

    (School of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forest University, Beijing 100083, China
    College of Forestry, Beijing Forest University, Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

Abandoned mines are typical areas of soil erosion. Landscape transformation of abandoned mines is an important means to balance the dual objectives of regional ecological restoration and industrial heritage protection, but the secondary development and construction process of mining relics require long-term monitoring with objective scientific indicators and effective assessment of their management effectiveness. This paper takes Tongluo Mountain Mining Park in Chongqing as an example and uses a remote sensing ecological index (RSEI) based on Landsat-8 image data to assess the spatial and temporal differences in the dynamic changes in the ecological and environmental quality of tertiary relic reserves with different degrees of development and protection in the park. Results showed that: ① The effect of vegetation cover, which can significantly improve soil and water conservation capacity. ② The RSEI is applicable to the evaluation of the effectiveness of ecological management of mines with a large amount of bare soil areas. ③ The mean value of the RSEI in the region as a whole increased by 0.090, and the mean values of the RSEI in the primary, secondary and tertiary relic reserves increased by 0.121, 0.112 and 0.006, respectively. ④ The increase in the RSEI in the study area is mainly related to the significant decrease in the dryness index (NDBSI) and the increase in the humidity index (WET). The remote sensing ecological index can objectively reflect the difference in the spatial and temporal dynamics of the ecological environment in tertiary relic protection, and this study provides a theoretical reference for the ecological assessment of secondary development-based management under difficult site conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Zeke Lian & Huichao Hao & Jing Zhao & Kaizhong Cao & Hesong Wang & Zhechen He, 2022. "Evaluation of Remote Sensing Ecological Index Based on Soil and Water Conservation on the Effectiveness of Management of Abandoned Mine Landscaping Transformation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-15, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:15:p:9750-:d:882805
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/15/9750/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/15/9750/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jingchao Liu & Jin Wu & Weiying Feng & Xia Li, 2020. "Ecological Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Water Bodies around Typical Copper Mines in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-12, June.
    2. Shougang Wang & Jiu Huang & Haochen Yu & Chuning Ji, 2020. "Recognition of Landscape Key Areas in a Coal Mine Area of a Semi-Arid Steppe in China: A Case Study of Yimin Open-Pit Coal Mine," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-22, March.
    3. Congjian Sun & Xiaoming Li & Wenqiang Zhang & Xingong Li, 2020. "Evolution of Ecological Security in the Tableland Region of the Chinese Loess Plateau Using a Remote-Sensing-Based Index," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Xiuyan Han & Tianyi Cao & Xinlin Yan, 2021. "Comprehensive evaluation of ecological environment quality of mining area based on sustainable development indicators: a case study of Yanzhou Mining in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 7581-7605, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiayu Xia & Duyuzheng Ren & Xuhui Wang & Bo Xu & Xingyao Zhong & Yajiang Fan, 2023. "Ecosystem Quality Assessment and Ecological Restoration in Fragile Zone of Loess Plateau: A Case Study of Suide County, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-32, May.
    2. Meng Luo & Shengwei Zhang & Lei Huang & Zhiqiang Liu & Lin Yang & Ruishen Li & Xi Lin, 2022. "Temporal and Spatial Changes of Ecological Environment Quality Based on RSEI: A Case Study in Ulan Mulun River Basin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-19, October.
    3. Yifan Shen & Qi Li & Xiangjun Pei & Renjie Wei & Bingmei Yang & Ningfei Lei & Xiaochao Zhang & Daqiu Yin & Shijun Wang & Qizhong Tao, 2023. "Ecological Restoration of Engineering Slopes in China—A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-17, March.
    4. Ruth Mevianna Aurora & Katsunori Furuya, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Analysis of Urban Sprawl and Ecological Quality Study Case: Chiba Prefecture, Japan," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-21, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xu Bi & Bianrong Chang & Fen Hou & Zihan Yang & Qi Fu & Bo Li, 2021. "Assessment of Spatio-Temporal Variation and Driving Mechanism of Ecological Environment Quality in the Arid Regions of Central Asia, Xinjiang," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-23, July.
    2. Meng Luo & Shengwei Zhang & Lei Huang & Zhiqiang Liu & Lin Yang & Ruishen Li & Xi Lin, 2022. "Temporal and Spatial Changes of Ecological Environment Quality Based on RSEI: A Case Study in Ulan Mulun River Basin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-19, October.
    3. Fuyu Yang & Jingjing Xu & Xin Zhao & Xuekai Wang & Yi Xiong, 2022. "Assessment of the Grassland Ecological Compensation Policy (GECP) in Qinghai, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-16, September.
    4. Carlos J. Pardo Abad & José Fernández Álvarez, 2020. "Landscape as Digital Content and a Smart Tourism Resource in the Mining Area of Cartagena-La Unión (Spain)," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-21, April.
    5. Haochen Yu & Jiu Huang & Chuning Ji & Zi’ao Li, 2021. "Construction of a Landscape Ecological Network for a Large-Scale Energy and Chemical Industrial Base: A Case Study of Ningdong, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-24, March.
    6. Kaizheng Xiang & Anzhou Zhao & Haixin Liu & Xiangrui Zhang & Anbing Zhang & Xinle Tian & Zihan Jin, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Evolution and Coupling Pattern Analysis of Urbanization and Ecological Environmental Quality of the Chinese Loess Plateau," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-19, June.
    7. Binhua Zhao & Jianchun Han & Peng Li & Hongtao Li & Yangfan Feng & Bingze Hu & Guojun Zhang & Jie Li, 2023. "Evidence for Urbanization Effects on Eco-Environmental Quality: A Case Study of Guyuan City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-17, May.
    8. Huiqin Lian & Haiyang Yi & Yi Yang & Bin Wu & Rui Wang, 2021. "Impact of Coal Mining on the Moisture Movement in a Vadose Zone in Open-Pit Mine Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, April.
    9. Shangxiao Wang & Ming Zhang & Xi Xi, 2022. "Ecological Environment Evaluation Based on Remote Sensing Ecological Index: A Case Study in East China over the Past 20 Years," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-15, November.
    10. Yifan Shen & Qi Li & Xiangjun Pei & Renjie Wei & Bingmei Yang & Ningfei Lei & Xiaochao Zhang & Daqiu Yin & Shijun Wang & Qizhong Tao, 2023. "Ecological Restoration of Engineering Slopes in China—A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-17, March.
    11. Xueman Zuo & Jiazheng Li & Ludan Zhang & Zhilong Wu & Sen Lin & Xisheng Hu, 2023. "Spatio-Temporal Variations in Ecological Quality and Its Response to Topography and Road Network Based on GEE: Taking the Minjiang River Basin as a Case," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-25, September.
    12. Xiaoxia Su & Jing Wu & Pengshuo Li & Renjie Li & Penggen Cheng, 2022. "RSEI-Based Modeling of Ecological Security and Its Spatial Impacts on Soil Quality: A Case Study of Dayu, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-17, April.
    13. Qiang Liu & Feihong Yu & Xingmin Mu, 2022. "Evaluation of the Ecological Environment Quality of the Kuye River Source Basin Using the Remote Sensing Ecological Index," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-21, September.
    14. Yuxia Zhao & Yang Wang & Zifan Zhang & Yi Zhou & Haoqing Huang & Ming Chang, 2023. "The Evolution of Landscape Patterns and Its Ecological Effects of Open-Pit Mining: A Case Study in the Heidaigou Mining Area, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-26, March.
    15. Xun Zhang & Zhaoliang Gao & Yonghong Li & Guanfan Sun & Yunfeng Cen & Yongcai Lou & Yihang Yao & Wenbo Liu, 2023. "Eco-Environment Quality Response to Climate Change and Human Activities on the Loess Plateau, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-23, September.
    16. Ruihao Cui & Jiazheng Han & Zhenqi Hu, 2022. "Assessment of Spatial Temporal Changes of Ecological Environment Quality: A Case Study in Huaibei City, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-19, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:15:p:9750-:d:882805. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.