IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i22p9487-d445175.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Planning of Safety of Cities and Territory from the Point of View of Population Protection in the Czech Republic

Author

Listed:
  • Jiri Pokorny

    (Faculty of Safety Engineering, VSB—Technical University of Ostrava, Lumirova 13/630, 700 30 Ostrava-Vyskovice, Czech Republic)

  • Barbora Machalova

    (Faculty of Safety Engineering, VSB—Technical University of Ostrava, Lumirova 13/630, 700 30 Ostrava-Vyskovice, Czech Republic)

  • Simona Slivkova

    (Faculty of Safety Engineering, VSB—Technical University of Ostrava, Lumirova 13/630, 700 30 Ostrava-Vyskovice, Czech Republic)

  • Lenka Brumarova

    (Faculty of Safety Engineering, VSB—Technical University of Ostrava, Lumirova 13/630, 700 30 Ostrava-Vyskovice, Czech Republic)

  • Vladimir Vlcek

    (Fire Rescue Services of the Moravian-Silesian Region, Vyskovicka 40, 700 30 Ostrava-Zabreh, Czech Republic)

Abstract

Ensuring territorial safety is one of the state’s main tasks, and the public administration plays a primary role in fulfilling it. The safety and sustainability of a territory is ensured by, inter alia, safety planning, including spatial planning. Spatial planning contains safety requirements for population protection. The requirements for ensuring the safety of the population included in the spatial plan vary significantly between countries. The existing population protection requirements contained in the spatial plan have been unsatisfactory for a long time. The main issue is that they are out of date and difficult to apply. The article presents a new proposed method for determining requirements for the protection of the population, which is based on evaluating the risks in the cities and territory. The specific population protection requirements are determined based on the resulting risks and their scaling. The requirements are classified as general when the territory is not faced with external risks or specific when there are such risks. The method is applied to the conditions of the Czech Republic. In terms of national standard specifics, there are requirements in areas of public infrastructure, public utility buildings, and public benefit measures. The method for determining population protection requirements can be considered applicable in a general form by various countries if the national standards specifics or other aspects are taken into account.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiri Pokorny & Barbora Machalova & Simona Slivkova & Lenka Brumarova & Vladimir Vlcek, 2020. "Planning of Safety of Cities and Territory from the Point of View of Population Protection in the Czech Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-17, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:22:p:9487-:d:445175
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/22/9487/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/22/9487/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grazia Brunetta & Rosario Ceravolo & Carlo Alberto Barbieri & Alberto Borghini & Francesca de Carlo & Alfredo Mela & Silvia Beltramo & Andrea Longhi & Giulia De Lucia & Stefano Ferraris & Alessandro P, 2019. "Territorial Resilience: Toward a Proactive Meaning for Spatial Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Kročová, Šárka & Kavan, Štěpán, 2019. "Cooperation in the Czech Republic border area on water management sustainability," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 351-356.
    3. Frank Thomalla & Michael Boyland & Karlee Johnson & Jonathan Ensor & Heidi Tuhkanen & Åsa Gerger Swartling & Guoyi Han & John Forrester & Darin Wahl, 2018. "Transforming Development and Disaster Risk," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-12, May.
    4. Jochen Monstadt & Martin Schmidt, 2019. "Urban resilience in the making? The governance of critical infrastructures in German cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(11), pages 2353-2371, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Simona Slivkova & Lenka Brumarova & Barbora Kluckova & Jiri Pokorny & Katerina Tomanova, 2021. "Safety of Constructions from the Point of View of Population Protection in the Context of Industry 4.0 in the Czech Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Dalibor Smažinka & Štěpán Kavan & Martin Hrinko, 2024. "Evaluation of the current technologies used for the physical security and safety of selected railway tunnel portals as a case study in the Czech Republic," Journal of Transportation Security, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 1-28, December.
    3. Yoon Ha Lee & Min Seok Kim & Ji Soo Lee, 2020. "Firefighting in Vulnerable Areas Based on the Connection between Fire Hydrants and Fire Brigade," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Banica, Alexandru & Corodescu-Rosca, Ema & Kourtit, Karima & Nijkamp, Peter, 2025. "Actionable policy responses to disaster threats – A comparative study on resilience and sustainability in global cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    2. Jiao Zhang & Qian Wang & Yiping Xia & Katsunori Furuya, 2022. "Knowledge Map of Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development: A Visual Analysis Using CiteSpace," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-24, February.
    3. Chong Meng & Siyang Zhou & Wei Li, 2021. "An Optimization Model for Water Management under the Dual Constraints of Water Pollution and Water Scarcity in the Fenhe River Basin, North China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-18, September.
    4. Guglielmina Mutani & Valeria Todeschi & Simone Beltramino, 2020. "Energy Consumption Models at Urban Scale to Measure Energy Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-31, July.
    5. Chun-Fa Cheng & Kuo-Tai Cheng & Kirk Chang & Hsing-Wei Tai, 2024. "Resilience Governance and Acceptance of Climate Change Policy in Taiwan Special Municipalities," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, September.
    6. Erick Elysio Reis Amorim & Monique Menezes & Karoline Vitória Gonçalves Fernandes, 2022. "Urban Living Labs and Critical Infrastructure Resilience: A Global Match?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-20, August.
    7. Fekete, Alexander & Fuchs, Sven & Garschagen, Matthias & Hutter, Gérard & Klepp, Silja & Lüder, Catharina & Neise, Thomas & Sett, Dominic & von Elverfeldt, Kirsten & Wannewitz, Mia, 2022. "Adjustment or transformation? Disaster risk intervention examples from Austria, Indonesia, Kiribati and South Africa," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    8. Zongrun Wang & Yiyun Tan & Xin Lu, 2024. "Twenty Years of Resilient City Research: Reviews and Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-23, December.
    9. Emmanuel Eze & Alexander Siegmund, 2024. "Identifying disaster risk factors and hotspots in Africa from spatiotemporal decadal analyses using INFORM data for risk reduction and sustainable development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 4020-4041, August.
    10. Carmela Mariano & Francesca Rossi, 2023. "RivEr/Generation_LAB-Linking Resilience with Inclusiveness in the Urban-Built Environment of Rome," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-22, March.
    11. Yan Shi & Klaus Seeland, 2019. "Using RISKPLAN for Earthquake Risk Assessment in Sichuan Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, March.
    12. Kourtit, Karima & Nijkamp, Peter & Banica, Alexandru, 2023. "An analysis of natural disasters’ effects – A global comparative study of ‘Blessing in Disguise’," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    13. Danial Mohabat Doost & Grazia Brunetta & Ombretta Caldarice, 2023. "In Search of Equitable Resilience: Unravelling the Links between Urban Resilience Planning and Social Equity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-15, September.
    14. Krzysztof Goniewicz & Frederick M. Burkle, 2019. "Challenges in Implementing Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction in Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-8, July.
    15. Chiara Minioto & Francesco Martinico & Maria Rosa Trovato & Salvatore Giuffrida, 2023. "Data and Values: Axiological Interpretations of Building Sprawl Landscape Risk in the Rural Territory of Noto (Italy)," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-32, June.
    16. Silu Chen & Liang Peng, 2025. "Road to Resilient Cities: The Power of Education Investment from China’s Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-24, April.
    17. Alexandru Bănică & Karima Kourtit & Peter Nijkamp, 2020. "Natural disasters as a development opportunity: a spatial economic resilience interpretation," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 40(2), pages 223-249, October.
    18. Yosi S. Mutiarni & Hitoshi Nakamura & Yasmin Bhattacharya, 2022. "The Resilient Community: Strengthening People-Centered Disaster Risk Reduction in the Merapi Volcano Community, Java, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-28, February.
    19. Qin He & Guochen Zhang & Jizhe Zhou & Xintong Zhao & Ruiqi Dong & Quanhua Hou, 2025. "Study on Spatial Adaptability of Tangjia Village in the Weibei Loess Plateau Gully Region Based on Diverse Social Relationships," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-21, June.
    20. Goran Janaćković & Žarko Vranjanac & Dejan Vasović, 2025. "Enhancing Urban Resilience: Integrating Actions for Resilience (A4R) and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) for Sustainable Urban Development and Proactive Hazard Mitigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-21, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:22:p:9487-:d:445175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.