IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i22p9487-d445175.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Planning of Safety of Cities and Territory from the Point of View of Population Protection in the Czech Republic

Author

Listed:
  • Jiri Pokorny

    (Faculty of Safety Engineering, VSB—Technical University of Ostrava, Lumirova 13/630, 700 30 Ostrava-Vyskovice, Czech Republic)

  • Barbora Machalova

    (Faculty of Safety Engineering, VSB—Technical University of Ostrava, Lumirova 13/630, 700 30 Ostrava-Vyskovice, Czech Republic)

  • Simona Slivkova

    (Faculty of Safety Engineering, VSB—Technical University of Ostrava, Lumirova 13/630, 700 30 Ostrava-Vyskovice, Czech Republic)

  • Lenka Brumarova

    (Faculty of Safety Engineering, VSB—Technical University of Ostrava, Lumirova 13/630, 700 30 Ostrava-Vyskovice, Czech Republic)

  • Vladimir Vlcek

    (Fire Rescue Services of the Moravian-Silesian Region, Vyskovicka 40, 700 30 Ostrava-Zabreh, Czech Republic)

Abstract

Ensuring territorial safety is one of the state’s main tasks, and the public administration plays a primary role in fulfilling it. The safety and sustainability of a territory is ensured by, inter alia, safety planning, including spatial planning. Spatial planning contains safety requirements for population protection. The requirements for ensuring the safety of the population included in the spatial plan vary significantly between countries. The existing population protection requirements contained in the spatial plan have been unsatisfactory for a long time. The main issue is that they are out of date and difficult to apply. The article presents a new proposed method for determining requirements for the protection of the population, which is based on evaluating the risks in the cities and territory. The specific population protection requirements are determined based on the resulting risks and their scaling. The requirements are classified as general when the territory is not faced with external risks or specific when there are such risks. The method is applied to the conditions of the Czech Republic. In terms of national standard specifics, there are requirements in areas of public infrastructure, public utility buildings, and public benefit measures. The method for determining population protection requirements can be considered applicable in a general form by various countries if the national standards specifics or other aspects are taken into account.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiri Pokorny & Barbora Machalova & Simona Slivkova & Lenka Brumarova & Vladimir Vlcek, 2020. "Planning of Safety of Cities and Territory from the Point of View of Population Protection in the Czech Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-17, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:22:p:9487-:d:445175
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/22/9487/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/22/9487/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grazia Brunetta & Rosario Ceravolo & Carlo Alberto Barbieri & Alberto Borghini & Francesca de Carlo & Alfredo Mela & Silvia Beltramo & Andrea Longhi & Giulia De Lucia & Stefano Ferraris & Alessandro P, 2019. "Territorial Resilience: Toward a Proactive Meaning for Spatial Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Kročová, Šárka & Kavan, Štěpán, 2019. "Cooperation in the Czech Republic border area on water management sustainability," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 351-356.
    3. Frank Thomalla & Michael Boyland & Karlee Johnson & Jonathan Ensor & Heidi Tuhkanen & Åsa Gerger Swartling & Guoyi Han & John Forrester & Darin Wahl, 2018. "Transforming Development and Disaster Risk," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-12, May.
    4. Jochen Monstadt & Martin Schmidt, 2019. "Urban resilience in the making? The governance of critical infrastructures in German cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(11), pages 2353-2371, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yoon Ha Lee & Min Seok Kim & Ji Soo Lee, 2020. "Firefighting in Vulnerable Areas Based on the Connection between Fire Hydrants and Fire Brigade," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Simona Slivkova & Lenka Brumarova & Barbora Kluckova & Jiri Pokorny & Katerina Tomanova, 2021. "Safety of Constructions from the Point of View of Population Protection in the Context of Industry 4.0 in the Czech Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-20, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matthias Garschagen & Gusti Ayu Ketut Surtiari & Mostapha Harb, 2018. "Is Jakarta’s New Flood Risk Reduction Strategy Transformational?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-18, August.
    2. Jiao Zhang & Qian Wang & Yiping Xia & Katsunori Furuya, 2022. "Knowledge Map of Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development: A Visual Analysis Using CiteSpace," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-24, February.
    3. Chong Meng & Siyang Zhou & Wei Li, 2021. "An Optimization Model for Water Management under the Dual Constraints of Water Pollution and Water Scarcity in the Fenhe River Basin, North China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-18, September.
    4. Guglielmina Mutani & Valeria Todeschi & Simone Beltramino, 2020. "Energy Consumption Models at Urban Scale to Measure Energy Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-31, July.
    5. Hayley Leck & Mark Pelling & Ibidun Adelekan & David Dodman & Hamadou Issaka & Cassidy Johnson & Mtafu Manda & Blessing Mberu & Ezebunwa Nwokocha & Emmanuel Osuteye & Soumana Boubacar, 2018. "Towards Risk-Sensitive and Transformative Urban Development in Sub Saharan Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-21, July.
    6. Danial Mohabat Doost & Alessandra Buffa & Grazia Brunetta & Stefano Salata & Guglielmina Mutani, 2020. "Mainstreaming Energetic Resilience by Morphological Assessment in Ordinary Land Use Planning. The Case Study of Moncalieri, Turin (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-25, May.
    7. Erick Elysio Reis Amorim & Monique Menezes & Karoline Vitória Gonçalves Fernandes, 2022. "Urban Living Labs and Critical Infrastructure Resilience: A Global Match?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-20, August.
    8. Fekete, Alexander & Fuchs, Sven & Garschagen, Matthias & Hutter, Gérard & Klepp, Silja & Lüder, Catharina & Neise, Thomas & Sett, Dominic & von Elverfeldt, Kirsten & Wannewitz, Mia, 2022. "Adjustment or transformation? Disaster risk intervention examples from Austria, Indonesia, Kiribati and South Africa," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    9. R. Cantelmi & G. Di Gravio & R. Patriarca, 2021. "Reviewing qualitative research approaches in the context of critical infrastructure resilience," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 341-376, September.
    10. Pavithra Ganeshu & Terrence Fernando & Kaushal Keraminiyage, 2023. "Barriers to, and Enablers for, Stakeholder Collaboration in Risk-Sensitive Urban Planning: A Systematised Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-24, March.
    11. Carmela Mariano & Francesca Rossi, 2023. "RivEr/Generation_LAB-Linking Resilience with Inclusiveness in the Urban-Built Environment of Rome," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-22, March.
    12. Yan Shi & Klaus Seeland, 2019. "Using RISKPLAN for Earthquake Risk Assessment in Sichuan Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, March.
    13. Ensor, Jonathan & Tuhkanen, Heidi & Boyland, Michael & Salamanca, Albert & Johnson, Karlee & Thomalla, Frank & Lim Mangada, Ladylyn, 2021. "Redistributing resilience? Deliberate transformation and political capabilities in post-Haiyan Tacloban," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    14. Rogatka, Krzysztof & Starczewski, Tomasz & Kowalski, Mateusz, 2021. "Urban resilience in spatial planning of polish cities - True or false? Transformational perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    15. Kourtit, Karima & Nijkamp, Peter & Banica, Alexandru, 2023. "An analysis of natural disasters’ effects – A global comparative study of ‘Blessing in Disguise’," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    16. Danial Mohabat Doost & Grazia Brunetta & Ombretta Caldarice, 2023. "In Search of Equitable Resilience: Unravelling the Links between Urban Resilience Planning and Social Equity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-15, September.
    17. Krzysztof Goniewicz & Frederick M. Burkle, 2019. "Challenges in Implementing Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction in Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-8, July.
    18. Heidi Tuhkanen & Michael Boyland & Guoyi Han & Anjalee Patel & Karlee Johnson & Arno Rosemarin & Ladylyn Lim Mangada, 2018. "A Typology Framework for Trade-Offs in Development and Disaster Risk Reduction: A Case Study of Typhoon Haiyan Recovery in Tacloban, Philippines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-19, June.
    19. Chiara Minioto & Francesco Martinico & Maria Rosa Trovato & Salvatore Giuffrida, 2023. "Data and Values: Axiological Interpretations of Building Sprawl Landscape Risk in the Rural Territory of Noto (Italy)," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-32, June.
    20. Shomon Shamsuddin, 2023. "Urban in Question: Recovering the Concept of Urban in Urban Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-18, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:22:p:9487-:d:445175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.