IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i17p9927-d628654.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Safety of Constructions from the Point of View of Population Protection in the Context of Industry 4.0 in the Czech Republic

Author

Listed:
  • Simona Slivkova

    (Faculty of Safety Engineering, VSB—Technical University of Ostrava, Lumirova 13/630, 700 30 Ostrava, Czech Republic)

  • Lenka Brumarova

    (Faculty of Safety Engineering, VSB—Technical University of Ostrava, Lumirova 13/630, 700 30 Ostrava, Czech Republic)

  • Barbora Kluckova

    (Faculty of Safety Engineering, VSB—Technical University of Ostrava, Lumirova 13/630, 700 30 Ostrava, Czech Republic)

  • Jiri Pokorny

    (Faculty of Safety Engineering, VSB—Technical University of Ostrava, Lumirova 13/630, 700 30 Ostrava, Czech Republic)

  • Katerina Tomanova

    (Faculty of Safety Engineering, VSB—Technical University of Ostrava, Lumirova 13/630, 700 30 Ostrava, Czech Republic)

Abstract

The current safety situation and the conclusions of a number of strategic and conceptual works require a broader integration of the population protection system into the areas of construction management. The approaches adopted by individual countries to this matter differ greatly. In the Czech Republic, the definition of constructions to which it is necessary to apply population protection requirements has not been dealt with sufficiently. The construction technical requirements from the point of view of population protection are also not sufficiently dealt with. This article presents a new draft procedure for designating the requirements for the relevant constructions of population protection in the Czech Republic. In addition, possible external hazards affecting the constructions or their strategic importance functions were assessed. In conclusion, the general, specific, and strategic requirements for constructions are set. The procedure is applied to the conditions of the Czech Republic, but it is also applicable in other countries. The area of public protection is closely related to Industry 4.0. Ensuring the protection of the population, as well as the safety of workers, employers, and production facilities, is one of the basic preconditions for the development of the industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Simona Slivkova & Lenka Brumarova & Barbora Kluckova & Jiri Pokorny & Katerina Tomanova, 2021. "Safety of Constructions from the Point of View of Population Protection in the Context of Industry 4.0 in the Czech Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-20, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:17:p:9927-:d:628654
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9927/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9927/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Culot, Giovanna & Nassimbeni, Guido & Orzes, Guido & Sartor, Marco, 2020. "Behind the definition of Industry 4.0: Analysis and open questions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    2. Frank Thomalla & Michael Boyland & Karlee Johnson & Jonathan Ensor & Heidi Tuhkanen & Åsa Gerger Swartling & Guoyi Han & John Forrester & Darin Wahl, 2018. "Transforming Development and Disaster Risk," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-12, May.
    3. Renata Turisova & Juraj Sinay & Hana Pacaiova & Zuzana Kotianova & Juraj Glatz, 2020. "Application of the EFQM Model to Assess the Readiness and Sustainability of the Implementation of I4.0 in Slovakian Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-14, July.
    4. Chiara Garau & Valentina Maria Pavan, 2018. "Evaluating Urban Quality: Indicators and Assessment Tools for Smart Sustainable Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, February.
    5. Maria Polorecka & Jozef Kubas & Pavel Danihelka & Katarina Petrlova & Katarina Repkova Stofkova & Katarina Buganova, 2021. "Use of Software on Modeling Hazardous Substance Release as a Support Tool for Crisis Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, January.
    6. Katie Hiscock & Aled Jones, 2017. "Assessing the Extent to Which the UK’s National Risk Register Supports Local Risk Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-15, October.
    7. Jiri Pokorny & Barbora Machalova & Simona Slivkova & Lenka Brumarova & Vladimir Vlcek, 2020. "Planning of Safety of Cities and Territory from the Point of View of Population Protection in the Czech Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-17, November.
    8. Vendula Laciok & Katerina Sikorova & Bruno Fabiano & Ales Bernatik, 2021. "Trends and Opportunities of Tertiary Education in Safety Engineering Moving towards Safety 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-21, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ladislav Karda & Stepan Kavan, 2023. "Emergency Board Management as a Tool for Strengthening Resilience of the Electric Power Industry: A Case Study in the Czech Republic," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-19, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Renata Turisová & Hana Pačaiová & Zuzana Kotianová & Anna Nagyová & Michal Hovanec & Peter Korba, 2021. "Evaluation of eMaintenance Application Based on the New Version of the EFQM Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Agnieszka A. Tubis & Katarzyna Grzybowska, 2022. "In Search of Industry 4.0 and Logistics 4.0 in Small-Medium Enterprises—A State of the Art Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-26, November.
    3. Gilberto Santos & Jose Carlos Sá & Maria João Félix & Luís Barreto & Filipe Carvalho & Manuel Doiro & Kristína Zgodavová & Miladin Stefanović, 2021. "New Needed Quality Management Skills for Quality Managers 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, May.
    4. Alkaraan, Fadi & Elmarzouky, Mahmoud & Hussainey, Khaled & Venkatesh, V.G., 2023. "Sustainable strategic investment decision-making practices in UK companies: The influence of governance mechanisms on synergy between industry 4.0 and circular economy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    5. Matthias Garschagen & Gusti Ayu Ketut Surtiari & Mostapha Harb, 2018. "Is Jakarta’s New Flood Risk Reduction Strategy Transformational?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-18, August.
    6. Erhan Baran & Tulay Korkusuz Polat, 2022. "Classification of Industry 4.0 for Total Quality Management: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-20, March.
    7. Auktor, Georgeta Vidican, 2022. "The opportunities and challenges of Industry 4.0 for industrial development: A case study of Morocco's automotive and garment sectors," IDOS Discussion Papers 2/2022, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    8. Ying Zhou & Weiwei Li & Pingtao Yi & Chengju Gong, 2019. "Evaluation of City Sustainability from the Perspective of Behavioral Guidance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-17, November.
    9. André Luis Azevedo Guedes & Jeferson Carvalho Alvarenga & Maurício Dos Santos Sgarbi Goulart & Martius Vicente Rodriguez y Rodriguez & Carlos Alberto Pereira Soares, 2018. "Smart Cities: The Main Drivers for Increasing the Intelligence of Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-19, August.
    10. Marcin Janusz & Marcin Kowalczyk, 2022. "How Smart Are V4 Cities? Evidence from the Multidimensional Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-19, August.
    11. Sebastiano Carbonara & Marco Faustoferri & Davide Stefano, 2021. "Real Estate Values and Urban Quality: A Multiple Linear Regression Model for Defining an Urban Quality Index," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-17, December.
    12. Karolina Dudzic-Gyurkovich, 2023. "Study of Centrality Measures in the Network of Green Spaces in the City of Krakow," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-30, September.
    13. Rémy Le Boennec & Sterenn Lucas, 2020. "Does a positive density perception increase the probability of living in the ideal housing type? Evidence from the Loire-Atlantique Département in France," Working Papers hal-02441513, HAL.
    14. Mauro Caselli & Edwin Fourrier-Nicolai & Andrea Fracasso & Sergio Scicchitano, 2024. "Digital Technologies and Firms’ Employment and Training," CESifo Working Paper Series 11056, CESifo.
    15. Aleksandra Jadach-Sepioło & Katarzyna Olejniczak-Szuster & Michał Dziadkiewicz, 2021. "Does Environment Matter in Smart Revitalization Strategies? Management towards Sustainable Urban Regeneration Programs in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-16, July.
    16. Peerally, Jahan Ara & Santiago, Fernando & De Fuentes, Claudia & Moghavvemi, Sedigheh, 2022. "Towards a firm-level technological capability framework to endorse and actualize the Fourth Industrial Revolution in developing countries," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(10).
    17. Geandra Alves Queiroz & Paulo Nocera Alves Junior & Isotilia Costa Melo, 2022. "Digitalization as an Enabler to SMEs Implementing Lean-Green? A Systematic Review through the Topic Modelling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-21, October.
    18. Eleonora Di Maria & Valentina De Marchi & Ambra Galeazzo, 2022. "Industry 4.0 technologies and circular economy: The mediating role of supply chain integration," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 619-632, February.
    19. Hayley Leck & Mark Pelling & Ibidun Adelekan & David Dodman & Hamadou Issaka & Cassidy Johnson & Mtafu Manda & Blessing Mberu & Ezebunwa Nwokocha & Emmanuel Osuteye & Soumana Boubacar, 2018. "Towards Risk-Sensitive and Transformative Urban Development in Sub Saharan Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-21, July.
    20. Anna Adamik & Michał Nowicki & Andrius Puksas, 2022. "Energy Oriented Concepts and Other SMART WORLD Trends as Game Changers of Co-Production—Reality or Future?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-38, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:17:p:9927-:d:628654. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.