IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i19p7963-d419794.html

Sustainable Development of the Arctic Indigenous Communities: The Approach to Projects Optimization of Mining Company

Author

Listed:
  • Andrey Novoselov

    (Department of Mathematical Methods in Economics, Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, 36 Stremyanny Lane, 117997 Moscow, Russia)

  • Ivan Potravny

    (Basic department of Project and Program Management Capital Group, Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, 36 Stremyanny Lane, 117997 Moscow, Russia)

  • Irina Novoselova

    (Department of Integrated International Ecological Problems and Wildlife Management, Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO University), 76 Prosp. Vernadsky, 119454 Moscow, Russia)

  • Violetta Gassiy

    (Department of Public administration, Kuban State University, 149 Stavroposkaya, 350040 Krasnodar, Russia)

Abstract

The article discusses the issues of sustainable development of indigenous communities in the Arctic based on the optimization of projects of mining companies. The purpose of the article is to develop tools for decision-making to optimize the mining projects based on economic and mathematical models. The authors suppose that, by comparing and selecting different options for resource extraction, the use of various technologies and the impact of projects, the conditions of the traditional life of indigenous peoples, the preservation of health, it is possible to find a compromise solution for stakeholders. The case-study of Alrosa—a diamond giant mining in Yakutia is researched in the paper. To ensure sustainable development of traditional lands, it is proposed to optimize mining projects, in order to carry out a project maneuver during Arctic development. The project maneuver of the mining company makes it possible to choose the optimal solution from the existing alternatives for the extraction of minerals. The authors propose criteria and procedures for the selection of alternative options for the implementation of extractive projects. The alternative projects selected in this way make it possible to compensate to indigenous communities for the negative impact during industrial development of the Arctic.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrey Novoselov & Ivan Potravny & Irina Novoselova & Violetta Gassiy, 2020. "Sustainable Development of the Arctic Indigenous Communities: The Approach to Projects Optimization of Mining Company," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-18, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:19:p:7963-:d:419794
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/19/7963/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/19/7963/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Włodzimierz Ogryczak, 2000. "Multiple criteria linear programming model for portfolio selection," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 97(1), pages 143-162, December.
    2. V. I. Denisov & V. N. Chernogradskii & I. M. Potravny & P. Yu. Ivanova, 2020. "Directions of the Balanced Socioeconomic Development of the Arctic Zone of Russia (with the Example of Yakutia)," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 404-410, July.
    3. Andrey Novoselov & Irina Novoselova & Ruslan Aliev & Аndrey Avramenko, 2019. "Preventing regional social and environmental conflicts during oil pipeline construction projects," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(1), pages 773-785, September.
    4. B. N. Porfiryev & A. S. Tulupov, 2017. "Environmental hazard assessment and forecast of economic damage from industrial accidents," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 28(6), pages 600-607, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrey Novoselov & Ivan Potravny & Irina Novoselova & Violetta Gassiy, 2022. "Social Investing Modeling for Sustainable Development of the Russian Arctic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Ivan Potravny & Andrey Novoselov & Irina Novoselova & Katherine Yeshia Chávez Ferreyra & Violetta Gassiy, 2022. "Route Selection for Minerals’ Transportation to Ensure Sustainability of the Arctic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Vera P. Samarina & Tatiana P. Skufina & Diana Yu. Savon & Alexey I. Shinkevich, 2021. "Management of Externalities in the Context of Sustainable Development of the Russian Arctic Zone," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-12, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jang Ho Kim & Yongjae Lee & Woo Chang Kim & Frank J. Fabozzi, 2022. "Goal-based investing based on multi-stage robust portfolio optimization," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 313(2), pages 1141-1158, June.
    2. N. K. Oladejo & A. Abolarinwa & S. O. Salawu, 2020. "Linear Programming and Its Application Techniques in Optimizing Portfolio Selection of a Firm," Journal of Applied Mathematics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2020(1).
    3. D. B. Kuvalin & A. K. Moiseev & Yu. V. Zinchenko, 2019. "Russian Enterprises at the End of 2018: Analysis of Global Sustainable Development Goals and Difficulties in Obtaining Bank Loans," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 334-345, May.
    4. Serdar Kuzu & Murat Kirişci & Ali Kablan & Özden Calay, 2025. "Portfolio Selection Analysis with a Fermatean Fuzzy-type AHP," Istanbul Journal of Economics-Istanbul Iktisat Dergisi, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 75(1), pages 44-66, July.
    5. TKACENKO, Alexandra, 2014. "Linear Programming Methods For Solving The Portfolio’S Problems," Journal of Financial and Monetary Economics, Centre of Financial and Monetary Research "Victor Slavescu", vol. 1(1), pages 216-221.
    6. Sehgal, Ruchika & Sharma, Amita & Mansini, Renata, 2023. "Worst-case analysis of Omega-VaR ratio optimization model," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    7. Klamroth, Kathrin & Köbis, Elisabeth & Schöbel, Anita & Tammer, Christiane, 2017. "A unified approach to uncertain optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(2), pages 403-420.
    8. Rafael Rodríguez & Mariano Luque & Mercedes González, 2011. "Portfolio selection in the Spanish stock market by interactive multiobjective programming," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 19(1), pages 213-231, July.
    9. Mut, Murat & Wiecek, Margaret M., 2011. "Generalized equitable preference in multiobjective programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 212(3), pages 535-551, August.
    10. Panos Xidonas & Christis Hassapis & George Mavrotas & Christos Staikouras & Constantin Zopounidis, 2018. "Multiobjective portfolio optimization: bridging mathematical theory with asset management practice," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 267(1), pages 585-606, August.
    11. Hirschberger, Markus & Qi, Yue & Steuer, Ralph E., 2007. "Randomly generating portfolio-selection covariance matrices with specified distributional characteristics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(3), pages 1610-1625, March.
    12. Mansini, Renata & Ogryczak, Wlodzimierz & Speranza, M. Grazia, 2014. "Twenty years of linear programming based portfolio optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(2), pages 518-535.
    13. Goel, Anubha & Sharma, Amita, 2020. "Mixed value-at-risk and its numerical investigation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 541(C).
    14. P Xidonas & G Mavrotas & J Psarras, 2010. "A multiple criteria decision-making approach for the selection of stocks," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(8), pages 1273-1287, August.
    15. Renata Mansini & Włodzimierz Ogryczak & M. Speranza, 2007. "Conditional value at risk and related linear programming models for portfolio optimization," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 152(1), pages 227-256, July.
    16. Raghu Nandan Sengupta & Aditya Gupta & Subhankar Mukherjee & Gregor Weiss, 2024. "Bi-objective reliability based optimization: an application to investment analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 333(1), pages 47-78, February.
    17. Jarosław Hurkała & Tomasz Śliwiński, 2014. "Threshold Accepting Heuristic for Fair Flow Optimization in Wireless Mesh Networks," Journal of Applied Mathematics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2014(1).
    18. Abdelaziz, Fouad Ben & Aouni, Belaid & Fayedh, Rimeh El, 2007. "Multi-objective stochastic programming for portfolio selection," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(3), pages 1811-1823, March.
    19. Gour Sundar Mitra Thakur & Rupak Bhattacharyya & Seema Sarkar, 2022. "Fuzzy Expert System for Stock Portfolio Selection: An Application to Bombay Stock Exchange," Papers 2204.13385, arXiv.org, revised May 2022.
    20. Sonia García-Moreno & Víctor-Raúl López-Ruiz, 2023. "A Review of the Energy Sector as a Key Factor in Industry 4.0: The Case of Spain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-17, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:19:p:7963-:d:419794. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.